• Home
  • Practice Focus
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
    • How I Do It
    • TRIO Best Practices
  • Business of Medicine
    • Health Policy
    • Legal Matters
    • Practice Management
    • Tech Talk
    • AI
  • Literature Reviews
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
  • Career
    • Medical Education
    • Professional Development
    • Resident Focus
  • ENT Perspectives
    • ENT Expressions
    • Everyday Ethics
    • From TRIO
    • The Great Debate
    • Letter From the Editor
    • Rx: Wellness
    • The Voice
    • Viewpoint
  • TRIO Resources
    • Triological Society
    • The Laryngoscope
    • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
    • TRIO Combined Sections Meetings
    • COSM
    • Related Otolaryngology Events
  • Search

Pepsin Test Can Better Detect Aspiration Reflux, Chronic Lung Disease

by David Bronstein • December 1, 2013

  • Tweet
  • Email
Print-Friendly Version

You Might Also Like

  • Otolaryngologists Research Role of Pepsin in Reflux, Lung Disease
  • Multi-Time Point Salivary Pepsin Test as a First-Line Diagnosis of Laryngopharyngeal Reflux
  • What Is the Best Test for Pediatric Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease?
  • Alkaline Drinking Water May Benefit Patients with Reflux Disease
Explore This Issue
December 2013

 

Pepsin may be the best biomarker yet developed for assessing whether reflux and aspiration of stomach contents into the upper airways is an important contributing factor in pediatric lung disease, according to a team of researchers from the Medical College of Wisconsin (MCW). Their study, published in JAMA Otolaryngology-Head & Neck Surgery, found that more than two-thirds of children with a variety of pulmonary disorders tested positive for pepsin in bronchoalveolar lavage fluid (BAL) (2013;139:996-1001). All of the control BAL specimens, obtained from patients with no history of lung disease, tested negative for pepsin, according to co-author Joseph Kerschner, MD, dean and professor of otolaryngology at MCW.

The results show that the pepsin test, a proprietary Western blot assay developed by the team, is a highly accurate method for assessing aspiration-associated extraesophageal reflux disease (AERD) and, moreover, that AERD may be a previously under-recognized cause of pulmonary symptoms in patients with chronic lung problems.

Given the relative inaccuracy of a lipid-laden alveolar macrophage (LLM) assay, a test that is considered one of the current mainstays for evaluating aspiration in these patients and that was assessed in the same study, the results may prove to be practice-changing, Dr. Kerschner told ENTtoday. “Granted, more work needs to be done to show causality between a positive pepsin test, the presence of AERD and chronic respiratory symptoms,” he said. “But once we get there—and we are confident we will—we really feel this is a groundbreaking paper that will have a major impact on how clinicians ultimately diagnose and treat patients with chronic lung disease.”

The study, which was first reported at the 2013 Spring Meeting of the American Society of Pediatric Otolaryngology, included 76 patients (mean age, 6.5 years): 34 who underwent bronchoscopy, 31 who underwent tracheostomy and 11 who served as controls. Patients in the bronchoscopy and tracheostomy groups had a variety of chronic respiratory symptoms, including recurrent wheezing, chronic cough, recurrent pneumonia, regurgitation, suspected aspiration, and shortness of breath. None of the control patients had such conditions; in most cases, they had undergone the diagnostic lung testing prior to elective surgery and the bronchial aspirate was collected through their endotracheal tube.

The researchers identified pepsin-positive BAL fluid specimens in 25 patients who underwent bronchoscopy (74 percent) and 22 patients in the tracheostomy group (71 percent). As noted, all control specimens were negative for pepsin. LLM results, in contrast, were much less helpful; the macrophage biomarker was detected in BAL specimens from 31 patients in the bronchoscopy group (91 percent), 16 patients in the tracheostomy group (52 percent) and perhaps most importantly, in seven control patients (64 percent).

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 | Single Page

Filed Under: Features, Laryngology, Pediatric, Practice Focus Tagged With: pepsin, refluxIssue: December 2013

You Might Also Like:

  • Otolaryngologists Research Role of Pepsin in Reflux, Lung Disease
  • Multi-Time Point Salivary Pepsin Test as a First-Line Diagnosis of Laryngopharyngeal Reflux
  • What Is the Best Test for Pediatric Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease?
  • Alkaline Drinking Water May Benefit Patients with Reflux Disease

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

The Triological SocietyENTtoday is a publication of The Triological Society.

Polls

Have you invented or patented something that betters the field of otolaryngology?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...
  • Polls Archive

Top Articles for Residents

  • Applications Open for Resident Members of ENTtoday Edit Board
  • How To Provide Helpful Feedback To Residents
  • Call for Resident Bowl Questions
  • New Standardized Otolaryngology Curriculum Launching July 1 Should Be Valuable Resource For Physicians Around The World
  • Do Training Programs Give Otolaryngology Residents the Necessary Tools to Do Productive Research?
  • Popular this Week
  • Most Popular
  • Most Recent
    • The Dramatic Rise in Tongue Tie and Lip Tie Treatment

    • Otolaryngologists Are Still Debating the Effectiveness of Tongue Tie Treatment

    • The Road Less Traveled—at Least by Otolaryngologists

    • The Best Site for Pediatric TT Placement: OR or Office?

    • Rating Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Severity: How Do Two Common Instruments Compare?

    • The Dramatic Rise in Tongue Tie and Lip Tie Treatment

    • Rating Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Severity: How Do Two Common Instruments Compare?

    • Is Middle Ear Pressure Affected by Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Use?

    • Otolaryngologists Are Still Debating the Effectiveness of Tongue Tie Treatment

    • Complications for When Physicians Change a Maiden Name

    • Leaky Pipes—Time to Focus on Our Foundations
    • You Are Among Friends: The Value Of Being In A Group
    • How To: Full Endoscopic Procedures of Total Parotidectomy
    • How To: Does Intralesional Steroid Injection Effectively Mitigate Vocal Fold Scarring in a Rabbit Model?
    • What Is the Optimal Anticoagulation in HGNS Surgery in Patients with High-Risk Cardiac Comorbidities?

Follow Us

  • Contact Us
  • About Us
  • Advertise
  • The Triological Society
  • The Laryngoscope
  • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • Cookies

Wiley

Copyright © 2025 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies. ISSN 1559-4939