• Home
  • Practice Focus
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
    • How I Do It
    • TRIO Best Practices
  • Business of Medicine
    • Health Policy
    • Legal Matters
    • Practice Management
    • Tech Talk
    • AI
  • Literature Reviews
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
  • Career
    • Medical Education
    • Professional Development
    • Resident Focus
  • ENT Perspectives
    • ENT Expressions
    • Everyday Ethics
    • From TRIO
    • The Great Debate
    • Letter From the Editor
    • Rx: Wellness
    • The Voice
    • Viewpoint
  • TRIO Resources
    • Triological Society
    • The Laryngoscope
    • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
    • TRIO Combined Sections Meetings
    • COSM
    • Related Otolaryngology Events
  • Search

PET-CT Adds to Management of Salivary Gland Malignancies

by Sue Pondrom • April 1, 2010

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
Print-Friendly Version

What is the efficacy of combined positron emission tomography-computed tomography (PET-CT) in identifying salivary gland malignancies, and what is its role in the management of these patients?

You Might Also Like

  • HN Cancer Patients with Negative Imaging History Derive Limited Benefit from Subsequent PET-CT
  • Survival for Advanced Head, Neck Cancer Improvements May Be Related to PET
  • PET-CT is Cost-Effective for N2 Disease After Chemoradiotherapy
  • PET-Directed Management of Node-Positive Head and Neck Cancers
Explore This Issue
April 2010

Background: In early studies, PET information improved the sensitivity of CT in detecting primary salivary tumors, cervical metastases and distant metastases, but the small number of patients and the evolution to combined PET-CT scanning suggest a re-evaluation of the role of these scans.

Study Design: Chart review of 55 patients between January 2000 and October 2008

Setting: University of Pittsburgh

Synopsis: A total of 135 PET-CT scans (mean of 2.5 per patient) were reviewed and correlated with clinicopathological information. PET-CT was used primarily in the setting of surveillance for recurrent or distant disease but also for restaging patients with known recurrence and in initial staging and surgical planning. The sensitivity, specificity and positive and negative predictive values for PET-CT were analyzed. Overall, PET-CT demonstrated a sensitivity of 74.4 percent, specificity of 100 percent, positive predictive value of 100 percent and a negative predictive value of 61.5 percent. There was no significant difference in sensitivity between high-grade tumors and low-intermediate-grade tumors. PET-CT altered or confirmed management in 47.3 percent of the patients.

Bottom Line: PET-CT is effective in the evaluation of salivary cancers and is particularly useful in initial staging and for surgical and radiation therapy planning. There appears to be less benefit in long-term surveillance and detecting distant metastasis where CT with contrast alone is likely to be sufficient.

Citation: Razfar A, Heron DE, Branstetter BF IV, et al. Positron emission tomography-computed tomography adds to the management of salivary gland malignancies. Laryngoscope. 2010;120(4):734-738.

—Reviewed by Sue Pondrom

Filed Under: Laryngology, Literature Reviews Tagged With: clinical, PET-CT, salivary cancers, scansIssue: April 2010

You Might Also Like:

  • HN Cancer Patients with Negative Imaging History Derive Limited Benefit from Subsequent PET-CT
  • Survival for Advanced Head, Neck Cancer Improvements May Be Related to PET
  • PET-CT is Cost-Effective for N2 Disease After Chemoradiotherapy
  • PET-Directed Management of Node-Positive Head and Neck Cancers

The Triological SocietyENTtoday is a publication of The Triological Society.

Polls

Have you invented or patented something that betters the field of otolaryngology?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...
  • Polls Archive

Top Articles for Residents

  • Applications Open for Resident Members of ENTtoday Edit Board
  • How To Provide Helpful Feedback To Residents
  • Call for Resident Bowl Questions
  • New Standardized Otolaryngology Curriculum Launching July 1 Should Be Valuable Resource For Physicians Around The World
  • Do Training Programs Give Otolaryngology Residents the Necessary Tools to Do Productive Research?
  • Popular this Week
  • Most Popular
  • Most Recent
    • Otolaryngologists as Entrepreneurs: Transforming Patient Care And Practice

    • The Dramatic Rise in Tongue Tie and Lip Tie Treatment

    • Continued Discussion And Engagement Are Essential To How Otolaryngologists Are Championing DEI Initiatives In Medicine

    • Rating Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Severity: How Do Two Common Instruments Compare?

    • Otolaryngologists Are Still Debating the Effectiveness of Tongue Tie Treatment

    • The Dramatic Rise in Tongue Tie and Lip Tie Treatment

    • Rating Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Severity: How Do Two Common Instruments Compare?

    • Is Middle Ear Pressure Affected by Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Use?

    • Otolaryngologists Are Still Debating the Effectiveness of Tongue Tie Treatment

    • Complications for When Physicians Change a Maiden Name

    • Physician Handwriting: A Potentially Powerful Healing Tool
    • Leaky Pipes—Time to Focus on Our Foundations
    • You Are Among Friends: The Value Of Being In A Group
    • How To: Full Endoscopic Procedures of Total Parotidectomy
    • How To: Does Intralesional Steroid Injection Effectively Mitigate Vocal Fold Scarring in a Rabbit Model?

Follow Us

  • Contact Us
  • About Us
  • Advertise
  • The Triological Society
  • The Laryngoscope
  • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • Cookies

Wiley

Copyright © 2025 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies. ISSN 1559-4939