• Home
  • Practice Focus
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
    • How I Do It
    • TRIO Best Practices
  • Business of Medicine
    • Health Policy
    • Legal Matters
    • Practice Management
    • Tech Talk
    • AI
  • Literature Reviews
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
  • Career
    • Medical Education
    • Professional Development
    • Resident Focus
  • ENT Perspectives
    • ENT Expressions
    • Everyday Ethics
    • From TRIO
    • The Great Debate
    • Letter From the Editor
    • Rx: Wellness
    • The Voice
    • Viewpoint
  • TRIO Resources
    • Triological Society
    • The Laryngoscope
    • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
    • TRIO Combined Sections Meetings
    • COSM
    • Related Otolaryngology Events
  • Search

Potential Advantage Using Robotic Thyroidectomy via Posterior Neck Approach with the DaVinci Single Port System

by Charles D. Meyer, MD, Michael P. Wu, MD, Lauren E. Miller, MD, Tara E. Mokhtari, MD, and Jeremy D. Richmon, MD • January 5, 2024

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
Print-Friendly Version

INTRODUCTION

The evolution of thyroidectomy operation approaches has been catalyzed by the introduction of the Da Vinci surgical robotic system, which can offer the surgeon improved visualization and ability for tissue dissection using wristed instrumentation (Head Neck. 2011. doi:10.1002/HED.21454). While the gasless transaxillary robotic thyroidectomy has become popular in Korea (Surgery. 2009. doi:10.1016/J.SURG.2009.09.007), it has had limited adoption in the United States.

You Might Also Like

  • How To: Technique, Pitfalls of the Transaxillary Approach for Robotic Thyroidectomy
  • Minimally Invasive Thyroidectomy Not Inferior to Conventional Surgery
  • Do Nimodipine and Steroids Influence Recovery Time in Post-Thyroidectomy Recurrent Laryngeal Nerve Paralysis?
  • Experience with Robotic Thyroid Surgery in North American Patients
Explore This Issue
December 2023

In response to the challenges of the transaxillary approach, Terris et al. described the robotic facelift (RF) thyroidectomy, which uses a retroauricular facelift incision for insertion of the Da Vinci robotic camera and arms (Laryngoscope. 2011. doi:10.1002/LARY.21832), and has been reported in the Western population using the Da Vinci Si and Xi systems. In 2019, the new Da Vinci single port (Sp) surgical system received clearance from the U.S. Food and Drug Administration for transoral otolaryngology procedures. Compared with the older multiarm Da Vinci Si and Xi systems in which the RF thyroidectomy was initially described, the Sp system offers the potential advantage of increased access and flexibility through a smaller incision and working tunnel (Head Neck. 2020. doi:10.1002/HED.26436). Here we report our initial experience using the Sp system for robotic thyroidectomy via posterior neck approach (RT-PNA).

METHOD

A retrospective chart review was performed for all patients undergoing RT-PNA by the senior author at Massachusetts Eye and Ear from 2022 to 2023.

Patients with thyroid nodules requiring hemithyroidectomy wishing to avoid an anterior neck scar were offered RT-PNA. One exception was a patient with a 5.8-cm thymic cyst who was motivated to avoid an anterior neck scar. Patients requiring total thyroidectomy were offered transoral robotic or traditional open approaches.

Surgical Technique: Setup and Positioning

The patient was intubated with a Nerve Integrity Monitoring (NIM) endotracheal tube and positioning is verified with GlideScope video laryngoscopy. The patient was positioned supine with a thyroid bag or shoulder roll positioned for moderate neck extension. The chin was turned to the contralateral side and braced against a shoulder roll or stack of blue towels. Over-rotation can tighten the neck skin envelope and limit operating space. A 6–8 cm vertical incision was planned 1 cm behind the posterior border of the sternocleidomastoid muscle (SCM). The hairline would be shaved if needed. This positioning allows for a shorter distance to the thyroid bed and a more favorable instrument angle to engage the inferior pole vessels, yet is well concealed when viewed from the front. A more posterior incision can be made within the hairline, but this increases the distance to the operative field and the amount of muscle retraction needed, which can increase postoperative pain.

Access and Approach

Figure 1. Positioning of the Thompson Retractor System prior to docking of the robotic system. The yellow arrow indicates the Deaver retractor attachment and the yellow asterisk indicates the concave lateral retractor attachment..

The patient was prepped, draped, and the incision line was injected with 2% lidocaine with 1:100,000 epinephrine. The skin was pulled anteriorly so the incision line sat on top of the posterior border of the SCM. This maneuver decreases the risk of proceeding below the SCM, which can place the spinal accessory nerve and branchial plexus at risk. The skin was incised sharply and a subdermal plane was elevated over the SCM until the lateral aspect of the platysma was identified, at which point dissection proceeded deep to the platysma. The external jugular vein and great auricular nerve were frequently encountered and were preserved. Subplatysmal dissection proceeded to the midline and until the thyroid cartilage and sternal notch were clearly visible. To retract the SCM posteriorly, the investing fascia was released medially, separating the anterior border of the SCM from the omohyoid and sternohyoid muscles. The Thompson Retractor System was then positioned (Figure 1) such that the skin envelope was elevated in the trajectory of the plane of dissection with the Deaver retractor attachment. The SCM was retracted posteriorly with the concave lateral retractor to reveal the carotid sheath. The NIM stimulating probe was used to stimulate the vagus nerve within the carotid sheath to verify proper functioning of the NIM system.

The Sp robotic system was positioned with the arms directed parallel to the plane of dissection. The camera was docked in the “up” position, with a monopolar cautery instrument superiorly, a Maryland bipolar forceps inferiorly, and a Cadiere forceps or a second Maryland bipolar forceps in the “down” position. For energy-based instrumentation, the ERBE generator was used and the senior author prefers effect settings of 5 and 3 for “Cut” and “Coag,” respectively. The omohyoid and sternohyoid were elevated off the thyroid to allow a broad plane of dissection, and then placed under the Deaver retractor attachment. The superior thyroid vessels were identified and ligated using the Maryland bipolar forceps. This allowed medial rotation of the thyroid and identification of the recurrent laryngeal nerve (RLN) within the tracheal esophageal groove. The NIM nerve stimulator was used to verify proper functioning. Dissection then continued inferiorly to identify and ligate the inferior thyroid vessels. Care was taken to identify and preserve the superior and inferior parathyroid glands with their associated blood supply by maintaining a capsular plane of dissection and minimizing monopolar electrocautery.

To complete the dissection of the RLN to the cricothyroid joint, the second grasping forceps in the “down” position was used to retract the thyroid gland ventromedially. This allows the inferior Maryland forceps to approach the RLN in the traditional inferior-to-superior fashion. Once the RLN was free of the thyroid gland and confirmed to be stimulating, the gland was again retracted dorsally and posteriorly by the inferior forceps, exposing the isthmus. The isthmus was then divided with bipolar or monopolar cautery. The specimen was removed, the wound bed was irrigated, and hemostasis was verified. The RLN and vagus were again stimulated to ensure proper function.

The skin was closed in layers with Monocryl sutures in a deep dermal fashion, with Dermabond skin glue superficially. A surgical drain was not necessary in our experience. The patient was observed in the postoperative recovery area for two to four hours and discharged home with scheduled follow-up in clinic in one to two weeks where repeat video laryngoscopy was performed to assess vocal cord function.

RESULTS

Ten patients underwent RT-PNA for thyroid pathology except for a single patient with a thymic cyst. Three had a prior history of keloids or hypertrophic scar. Mean operating time was 139 minutes, and there were no significant complications. There were no instances of temporary or permanent RLN injury. No patients required completion thyroidectomy.   

Pages: 1 2 3 | Multi-Page

Filed Under: How I Do It, Laryngology, Practice Focus Tagged With: DaVinci Single Port SystemIssue: December 2023

You Might Also Like:

  • How To: Technique, Pitfalls of the Transaxillary Approach for Robotic Thyroidectomy
  • Minimally Invasive Thyroidectomy Not Inferior to Conventional Surgery
  • Do Nimodipine and Steroids Influence Recovery Time in Post-Thyroidectomy Recurrent Laryngeal Nerve Paralysis?
  • Experience with Robotic Thyroid Surgery in North American Patients

The Triological SocietyENTtoday is a publication of The Triological Society.

Polls

Would you choose a concierge physician as your PCP?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...
  • Polls Archive

Top Articles for Residents

  • Applications Open for Resident Members of ENTtoday Edit Board
  • How To Provide Helpful Feedback To Residents
  • Call for Resident Bowl Questions
  • New Standardized Otolaryngology Curriculum Launching July 1 Should Be Valuable Resource For Physicians Around The World
  • Do Training Programs Give Otolaryngology Residents the Necessary Tools to Do Productive Research?
  • Popular this Week
  • Most Popular
  • Most Recent
    • A Journey Through Pay Inequity: A Physician’s Firsthand Account

    • The Dramatic Rise in Tongue Tie and Lip Tie Treatment

    • Otolaryngologists Are Still Debating the Effectiveness of Tongue Tie Treatment

    • Shifting the Treatment Goalpost Toward Medical Management of Recurrent Respiratory Papillomatosis

    • Excitement Around Gene Therapy for Hearing Restoration

    • The Dramatic Rise in Tongue Tie and Lip Tie Treatment

    • Rating Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Severity: How Do Two Common Instruments Compare?

    • Is Middle Ear Pressure Affected by Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Use?

    • Otolaryngologists Are Still Debating the Effectiveness of Tongue Tie Treatment

    • Complications for When Physicians Change a Maiden Name

    • Excitement Around Gene Therapy for Hearing Restoration
    • “Small” Acts of Kindness
    • How To: Endoscopic Total Maxillectomy Without Facial Skin Incision
    • Science Communities Must Speak Out When Policies Threaten Health and Safety
    • Observation Most Cost-Effective in Addressing AECRS in Absence of Bacterial Infection

Follow Us

  • Contact Us
  • About Us
  • Advertise
  • The Triological Society
  • The Laryngoscope
  • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • Cookies

Wiley

Copyright © 2025 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies. ISSN 1559-4939