• Home
  • Practice Focus
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
    • How I Do It
    • TRIO Best Practices
  • Business of Medicine
    • Health Policy
    • Legal Matters
    • Practice Management
    • Tech Talk
    • AI
  • Literature Reviews
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
  • Career
    • Medical Education
    • Professional Development
    • Resident Focus
  • ENT Perspectives
    • ENT Expressions
    • Everyday Ethics
    • From TRIO
    • The Great Debate
    • Letter From the Editor
    • Rx: Wellness
    • The Voice
    • Viewpoint
  • TRIO Resources
    • Triological Society
    • The Laryngoscope
    • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
    • TRIO Combined Sections Meetings
    • COSM
    • Related Otolaryngology Events
  • Search

Putting the Physician-Patient Relationship First

by Marlene Piturro, PhD, MBA • October 1, 2009

  • Tweet
  • Email
Print-Friendly Version

All in all, these ambitious plans create situations in which physicians, instead of being the system’s heart, are asked to help finance their downfall. As Medscape, an online newsletter for physicians, put it in its July 9 issue, President Obama wants to address the needs of…virtually all Americans, with the possible exception of physicians. A Medscape reader poll bears that out: 76% of respondents agreed that physician oversight of health care reform is the only way to get the job done right for patients and for themselves.

You Might Also Like

  • Terminating the Physician-Patient Relationship
  • How Electronic Health Records Impact Physician–Patient Relationship
  • How Otolaryngologists Can Navigate the Physician–Patient Relationship with Performing Artists
  • AMA’s Opt-Out Provision for Sale of Physician Prescribing Data Seen as First Step
Explore This Issue
October 2009

Because physicians are the only people licensed to practice medicine, they have the power-often sadly unused-to make or break health care reform schemes. Some pioneers, seeing the handwriting on the wall, have protected themselves by going bare-not taking any insurance reimbursement and opting for a patient-funded practice. Called concierge medicine, direct care, or subscription-based practices, they all allow physicians a different way to practice medicine.

A Very Different Alternative

With some form of health insurance overhaul likely to accelerate the trend of rising practice costs coupled with declining reimbursement for physicians, some doctors will join those who have already exited a practice model funded by insurance payments. Physicians such as Garrison Bliss, MD, a Seattle-based primary care physician and vascular surgeon John Kenagy of Belmont, MA, disgusted with governmental and insurance company constraints on how they practice medicine, have escaped health care hell by stepping away from the madness. They hearken back three-quarters of a century to pioneers like Dr. Fred Mott, an internist who established a cooperative prepayment plan for physicians serving Depression-era farmers at risk of losing their farms due to ill health.

Thirteen years ago, Dr. Bliss had a plan to get out of jail, as he recalls it, by no longer accepting any insurance reimbursement, including Medicare. Instead, he offered patients a subscription service for 24/7 medical care. Back then I realized I was working for the wrong people-insurance plans that didn’t value primary care. Medicare is the ringleader of not caring, especially since the advent of RBRVUs [Resource-Based Relative Value Units], which looked great on paper but continued to reward expensive care while punishing cheaper care, he explained. He claims that with a subscription-based practice, physicians can earn three times as much income in half the office time, practicing medicine the way they dreamed about in medical school.

Today Dr. Bliss’s plan, Qliance, costs consumers between $39 and $79 a month, depending on their ages and whether or not they opt for direct supervision of hospital care ($20 per month). Most patients in Qliance and other concierge practices purchase a high-deductible health plan (or wraparound insurance) with a health savings account for expensive and catastrophic care. Although subscription-based fees may, at first, seem to resemble capitation in that doctors get paid one fee to manage care, Dr. Bliss explained that such fees differ in that when insurers pay, the insurers’ interests come first. When patients pay, the patients’ interests and satisfaction come first, or they’ll vote with their feet.

Pages: 1 2 3 4 | Single Page

Filed Under: Everyday Ethics, Health Policy, Laryngology, Pediatric, Practice Management Tagged With: healthcare reform, insurance, patient safety, patient satisfaction, politics, reimbursement, tonsilsIssue: October 2009

You Might Also Like:

  • Terminating the Physician-Patient Relationship
  • How Electronic Health Records Impact Physician–Patient Relationship
  • How Otolaryngologists Can Navigate the Physician–Patient Relationship with Performing Artists
  • AMA’s Opt-Out Provision for Sale of Physician Prescribing Data Seen as First Step

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

The Triological SocietyENTtoday is a publication of The Triological Society.

Polls

Have you invented or patented something that betters the field of otolaryngology?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...
  • Polls Archive

Top Articles for Residents

  • Applications Open for Resident Members of ENTtoday Edit Board
  • How To Provide Helpful Feedback To Residents
  • Call for Resident Bowl Questions
  • New Standardized Otolaryngology Curriculum Launching July 1 Should Be Valuable Resource For Physicians Around The World
  • Do Training Programs Give Otolaryngology Residents the Necessary Tools to Do Productive Research?
  • Popular this Week
  • Most Popular
  • Most Recent
    • The Dramatic Rise in Tongue Tie and Lip Tie Treatment

    • Otolaryngologists Are Still Debating the Effectiveness of Tongue Tie Treatment

    • The Road Less Traveled—at Least by Otolaryngologists

    • The Best Site for Pediatric TT Placement: OR or Office?

    • Rating Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Severity: How Do Two Common Instruments Compare?

    • The Dramatic Rise in Tongue Tie and Lip Tie Treatment

    • Rating Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Severity: How Do Two Common Instruments Compare?

    • Is Middle Ear Pressure Affected by Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Use?

    • Otolaryngologists Are Still Debating the Effectiveness of Tongue Tie Treatment

    • Complications for When Physicians Change a Maiden Name

    • Leaky Pipes—Time to Focus on Our Foundations
    • You Are Among Friends: The Value Of Being In A Group
    • How To: Full Endoscopic Procedures of Total Parotidectomy
    • How To: Does Intralesional Steroid Injection Effectively Mitigate Vocal Fold Scarring in a Rabbit Model?
    • What Is the Optimal Anticoagulation in HGNS Surgery in Patients with High-Risk Cardiac Comorbidities?

Follow Us

  • Contact Us
  • About Us
  • Advertise
  • The Triological Society
  • The Laryngoscope
  • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • Cookies

Wiley

Copyright © 2025 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies. ISSN 1559-4939