• Home
  • Practice Focus
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
    • How I Do It
    • TRIO Best Practices
  • Business of Medicine
    • Health Policy
    • Legal Matters
    • Practice Management
    • Tech Talk
    • AI
  • Literature Reviews
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
  • Career
    • Medical Education
    • Professional Development
    • Resident Focus
  • ENT Perspectives
    • ENT Expressions
    • Everyday Ethics
    • From TRIO
    • The Great Debate
    • Letter From the Editor
    • Rx: Wellness
    • The Voice
    • Viewpoint
  • TRIO Resources
    • Triological Society
    • The Laryngoscope
    • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
    • TRIO Combined Sections Meetings
    • COSM
    • Related Otolaryngology Events
  • Search

Relationship Between Anatomical Site and Prognosis for Sinonasal Cancers

by Amy Hamaker • November 5, 2015

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
Print-Friendly Version

Is there a connection between anatomical location and survival for various sinonasal cancers?

Background: Sinonasal malignancies are relatively rare but aggressive tumors. Squamous cell carcinomas are the most common, reported to constitute more than 40% of cases. Due to the insidious progression of sinonasal malignancies, patients tend to initially present in later stages, with a poor prognosis. The authors sought to uncover a connection between anatomical location and survival for various sinonasal cancers.

You Might Also Like

  • Analysis of Five-Year Recurrence Patterns in Sinonasal Cancer
  • Oral Cavity Cancer Prognosis Has Improved Over Time
  • COSM14: HPV Status and Prognosis for Oropharyngeal Cancers
  • Unplanned Admissions after Sinonasal Surgery
Explore This Issue
November 2015

Study design: Retrospective analysis of 13,295 cases of sinonasal malignancies diagnosed between 1973 and 2011.

Setting: United States National Cancer Institute’s Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) registry.

Synopsis: The highest number of cases were localized in the nasal cavity and the lowest in the frontal sinus. Squamous cell neoplasms were the most common malignancies, regardless of site. The four most common overall histological subtypes were epithelial neoplasms, not otherwise specified (NOS), squamous cell carcinoma, adenocarcinoma, and mature B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL). Most cancers were discovered at stage I for the nasal cavity and at stage IV for the maxillary and ethmoid sinuses. Frontal sinus cancers carried the worst prognosis at 10 years, while nasal cavity cancers carried the best prognosis. Surgery had higher survival than no treatment across all subsites except for the frontal sinus, and combination surgery and radiotherapy had higher survival than radiotherapy alone across all subsites except for the sphenoid sinus. Limitations included a lack of details about specific surgical approaches, radiotherapies, and associated patient medical conditions, as well as changes in technology and management strategies over the time period studied.

Bottom line: By anatomical site, prognosis is best for nasal cavity cancers and worst for overlapping lesions. Survival seems to be best with surgery at every subsite except for the frontal sinus.

Citation: Dutta R, Dubal PM, Svider PF, Liu JK, Baredes S, Eloy JA. Sinonasal malignancies: a population-based analysis of site-specific incidence and survival. Laryngoscope. 2015;125:2491-2497.

Filed Under: Literature Reviews, Practice Focus, Rhinology, Rhinology Tagged With: sinonasal cancerIssue: November 2015

You Might Also Like:

  • Analysis of Five-Year Recurrence Patterns in Sinonasal Cancer
  • Oral Cavity Cancer Prognosis Has Improved Over Time
  • COSM14: HPV Status and Prognosis for Oropharyngeal Cancers
  • Unplanned Admissions after Sinonasal Surgery

The Triological SocietyENTtoday is a publication of The Triological Society.

Polls

Would you choose a concierge physician as your PCP?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...
  • Polls Archive

Top Articles for Residents

  • Applications Open for Resident Members of ENTtoday Edit Board
  • How To Provide Helpful Feedback To Residents
  • Call for Resident Bowl Questions
  • New Standardized Otolaryngology Curriculum Launching July 1 Should Be Valuable Resource For Physicians Around The World
  • Do Training Programs Give Otolaryngology Residents the Necessary Tools to Do Productive Research?
  • Popular this Week
  • Most Popular
  • Most Recent
    • A Journey Through Pay Inequity: A Physician’s Firsthand Account

    • The Dramatic Rise in Tongue Tie and Lip Tie Treatment

    • Otolaryngologists Are Still Debating the Effectiveness of Tongue Tie Treatment

    • Is Middle Ear Pressure Affected by Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Use?

    • Rating Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Severity: How Do Two Common Instruments Compare?

    • The Dramatic Rise in Tongue Tie and Lip Tie Treatment

    • Rating Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Severity: How Do Two Common Instruments Compare?

    • Is Middle Ear Pressure Affected by Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Use?

    • Otolaryngologists Are Still Debating the Effectiveness of Tongue Tie Treatment

    • Complications for When Physicians Change a Maiden Name

    • Excitement Around Gene Therapy for Hearing Restoration
    • “Small” Acts of Kindness
    • How To: Endoscopic Total Maxillectomy Without Facial Skin Incision
    • Science Communities Must Speak Out When Policies Threaten Health and Safety
    • Observation Most Cost-Effective in Addressing AECRS in Absence of Bacterial Infection

Follow Us

  • Contact Us
  • About Us
  • Advertise
  • The Triological Society
  • The Laryngoscope
  • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • Cookies

Wiley

Copyright © 2025 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies. ISSN 1559-4939