• Home
  • Practice Focus
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
    • How I Do It
    • TRIO Best Practices
  • Business of Medicine
    • Health Policy
    • Legal Matters
    • Practice Management
    • Technology
    • AI
  • Literature Reviews
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
  • Career
    • Medical Education
    • Professional Development
    • Resident Focus
  • ENT Perspectives
    • ENT Expressions
    • Everyday Ethics
    • From TRIO
    • The Great Debate
    • Letter From the Editor
    • Rx: Wellness
    • The Voice
    • Viewpoint
    • SUO Corner
  • TRIO Resources
    • Triological Society
    • The Laryngoscope
    • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
    • TRIO Combined Sections Meetings
    • COSM
    • Related Otolaryngology Events
  • Home
  • Practice Focus
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
    • How I Do It
    • TRIO Best Practices
  • Business of Medicine
    • Health Policy
    • Legal Matters
    • Practice Management
    • Technology
    • AI
  • Literature Reviews
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
  • Career
    • Medical Education
    • Professional Development
    • Resident Focus
  • ENT Perspectives
    • ENT Expressions
    • Everyday Ethics
    • From TRIO
    • The Great Debate
    • Letter From the Editor
    • Rx: Wellness
    • The Voice
    • Viewpoint
    • SUO Corner
  • TRIO Resources
    • Triological Society
    • The Laryngoscope
    • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
    • TRIO Combined Sections Meetings
    • COSM
    • Related Otolaryngology Events
  • Search

Research Highlights from the 2017 TRIO Annual Meeting

by Thomas R. Collins • June 20, 2017

  • Tweet
  • Email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
Print-Friendly Version

In a study on managing older patients with cochlear implants, Harold Pillsbury, MD, chair of otolaryngology–head and neck surgery at the University of North Carolina School of Medicine in Chapel Hill, said he and his team of investigators wanted to glean insights into how the care of patients older than 80 could be better managed (see “Considerations for Older Adult CI Recipients,” below).

You Might Also Like

  • Research Highlights from the 2017 TRIO Annual Meeting
  • Otolaryngology Research Highlights from Triological Society Annual Meeting
  • Research Highlights from 2016 Triological Society Annual Meeting
  • Coverage from the 2017 Triological Society Annual Meeting
Explore This Issue
June 2017

Through a retrospective chart review, the investigators found that the most common problem with the octo- and nonagenarian patient group was loss to follow up, with 23% not returning for routine follow-up appointments. Many patients, he said, only came back if their equipment failed. Lack of follow-up was often associated with transportation challenges, he added.

Advanced age, he reminded the audience, is not a barrier to the procedure. “One of the things that goes on is, if you operate on somebody who’s over 65, you’re going to figure out that they’re going to be 90 one day and what are you going to do about it?” he said.

At his center, which has performed more than 3,400 cochlear implants for patients of all ages, patients are seen every two weeks until their performance assessment is sufficient, then every six months until stability is maintained. The center requests that older patients be accompanied by a significant member of the family “so that we can really monitor what’s going on.” Additionally, large images of the equipment and the controls also make it easier to teach patients how to use the remote control, he said.

A key to treating this population, he added, has been the use of telemedicine and the training of staff at satellite locations to make it easier for patients to be seen quickly. “This is the new way of doing it,” Dr. Pillsbury said, “and it really has made a difference for us.”

Is There a Good Side? The Role of Laterality in Facial Paralysis Severity Perceptions

Unilateral paralysis of the face.

Unilateral paralysis of the face.
© Dr P. Marazzi / Science Source

A randomized study has found that observers showed no preference for one side of the face over the other when viewing pictures of patients with facial paralysis, said presenter Jason Nellis, MD, a resident in otolaryngology-head and neck surgery at Johns Hopkins School of Medicine in Baltimore. The results come despite prior studies that suggested an observer preference for the left side.

In the study, naïve observers completed an online survey with photos of faces with a completely paralyzed left side or right side. For each photo of a face, a photo with a horizontal mirror image was created to control for aesthetic factors beyond the paralysis. A total of 164 observers rated the affect, attractiveness, perceived impairment, and facial paralysis severity.

Pages: 1 2 3 4 | Single Page

Filed Under: Uncategorized Tagged With: clinical trials, facial trauma, head and neck cancer, research, thyroid cancer, Triological Society annual meetingIssue: June 2017

You Might Also Like:

  • Research Highlights from the 2017 TRIO Annual Meeting
  • Otolaryngology Research Highlights from Triological Society Annual Meeting
  • Research Highlights from 2016 Triological Society Annual Meeting
  • Coverage from the 2017 Triological Society Annual Meeting

The Triological SocietyENTtoday is a publication of The Triological Society.

Polls

More and more medical trainees are taking dedicated, prolonged gap years. Did you?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...
  • Polls Archive

Top Articles for Residents

  • Is the SLOR in Otolaryngology Residency Applications Contributing to Rural Disparities?
  • Applications Open for Resident Members of the ENTtoday Editorial Board
  • A Resident’s View of AI in Otolaryngology
  • Call for Resident Bowl Questions
  • Resident Pearls: Pediatric Otolaryngologists Share Tips for Safer, Smarter Tonsillectomies
  • Popular this Week
  • Most Popular
  • Most Recent
    • Gap Year for Research: Is It Worth It?
    • Office Laryngoscopy Is Not Aerosol Generating When Evaluated by Optical Particle Sizer
    • What Otolaryngologists Can Learn from Athletes
    • MRI Surveillance Should Extend to 10 Years Post- Op for Vestibular Schwannoma Patients
    • Empty Nose Syndrome: Physiological, Psychological, or Perhaps a Little of Both?
    • The Dramatic Rise in Tongue Tie and Lip Tie Treatment
    • Rating Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Severity: How Do Two Common Instruments Compare?
    • Is Middle Ear Pressure Affected by Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Use?
    • Otolaryngologists Are Still Debating the Effectiveness of Tongue Tie Treatment
    • Complications for When Physicians Change a Maiden Name
    • Short-Term Efficacy of Biologics in Recalcitrant AFRS: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    • The Devaluation of Otolaryngology: An Evaluation of CMS’s Involvement in Physician Reimbursement
    • Embolized Middle Meningeal Artery as a Surgical Landmark in Infratemporal Fossa
    • Lord of the (Magnetic) Rings: Rigid Bronchoscopy for Aspirated Magnetic Foreign Bodies in Tertiary Bronchi
    • What Otolaryngologists Can Learn from Athletes

Follow Us

  • Contact Us
  • About Us
  • Advertise
  • The Triological Society
  • The Laryngoscope
  • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • Cookies

Wiley

Copyright © 2026 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies. ISSN 1559-4939