• Home
  • Practice Focus
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
    • How I Do It
    • TRIO Best Practices
  • Business of Medicine
    • Health Policy
    • Legal Matters
    • Practice Management
    • Tech Talk
    • AI
  • Literature Reviews
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
  • Career
    • Medical Education
    • Professional Development
    • Resident Focus
  • ENT Perspectives
    • ENT Expressions
    • Everyday Ethics
    • From TRIO
    • The Great Debate
    • Letter From the Editor
    • Rx: Wellness
    • The Voice
    • Viewpoint
  • TRIO Resources
    • Triological Society
    • The Laryngoscope
    • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
    • TRIO Combined Sections Meetings
    • COSM
    • Related Otolaryngology Events
  • Search

Researchers Trying to Zero In on Nasal Polyps Find Target Elusive

by Thomas R. Collins • October 1, 2009

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
Print-Friendly Version

In one study, MFNS patients took 173 days to relapse, compared with 61 days for those who took a placebo (Stjarne P. et al. Arch Otolargyngol Head Neck Surg 2009;135:296-302).

You Might Also Like

  • Steroid-Eluting Implants Effective for Recurrent Nasal Polyps
  • Endoscopic Sinus Surgery Superior to Two of Three Biologics in Treating Severe Chronic Rhinosinusitis with Nasal Polyps
  • Steroid Therapy Comparable to Surgery for Patients with CRS with Nasal Polyps
  • Dupilumab, Functional Endoscopic Sinus Surgery Equally Effective in Reducing Chronic Rhinosinusitis with Nasal Polyps Symptoms
Explore This Issue
October 2009

Studies have also found that oral steroids, too, can help combat nasal polyps (Hissaria P et al. J Allergy Clin Immunol 2006;118:128-33; Benitez P. Laryngoscope 2006;116:770). But taking systemic corticosteroids should not be done without caution. Careful dosage is essential to limiting side effects, Dr. Cervin said.

In one study (Holmstrom et al. Acta Otolaryngol 2002;122:736-44), the dosage recommendation for prednisolone was 30 mg once a day for seven days, followed by 20 mg once a day for seven days, then 10 mg once a day for seven days-a series that could be repeated three times a year if needed.

A study led by Dr. Bachert (Drugs 2005;65:1537-52) found that a two- to three-week course of methylprednisolone should be recommended, starting at 32 mg once a day and reduced by half every five days, until the dose is cut to 8 mg. That regimen could be given up to four times a year, according to the study.

The American College of Rheumatology has recommended that patients starting long-term glucocorticoid therapy (5 mg a day or more for at least three months) should have bisphosphonate therapy to prevent bone loss, Dr. Cervin noted.

There is a lack of placebo-controlled trials evaluating antibiotics’ effect on polyps. Two uncontrolled studies have shown a reduction of polyp size, but a third showed no effect.

Macrolides have been shown to be more effective in neutrophilic inflammation, but might lack an effect in atopic patients.

Capsaicin has been shown to reduce recurrences, cut down polyp size, and improve rhinitis symptoms, Dr. Cervin said.

Leukotriene antagonists might be an alternative for patients with sensitivity to aspirin, but its effectiveness has not been documented, he said.

Furosemide is a possible alternative for steroid-resistant patients. Two studies have shown an effect compared to a placebo. A furosemide spray prevented relapse of polyposis better than mometasone spray and a placebo in one study (Passali et al. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2003;129:656-59).

According to the European Position Paper on Rhinosinusitis and Nasal Polyps 2007, the highest evidence grades for treatments still went to topical steroids, oral steroids, and nasal douche, which all received grades of A.

Ultimately, Dr. Cervin said, it is important for physicians to assess each patient and tailor the treatment accordingly. I think it’s very important that you characterize your patient, he said. It’s just not nasal polyps, it’s nasal polyps with something-for example, asthma or allergy. A treatment directed toward the associated disease as well will improve patients’ quality of life.

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 | Single Page

Filed Under: Head and Neck, Medical Education, Rhinology Tagged With: autoimmune, head and neck surgery, Nasal polyposis, research, staphylococcus, treatmentIssue: October 2009

You Might Also Like:

  • Steroid-Eluting Implants Effective for Recurrent Nasal Polyps
  • Endoscopic Sinus Surgery Superior to Two of Three Biologics in Treating Severe Chronic Rhinosinusitis with Nasal Polyps
  • Steroid Therapy Comparable to Surgery for Patients with CRS with Nasal Polyps
  • Dupilumab, Functional Endoscopic Sinus Surgery Equally Effective in Reducing Chronic Rhinosinusitis with Nasal Polyps Symptoms

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

The Triological SocietyENTtoday is a publication of The Triological Society.

Polls

Would you choose a concierge physician as your PCP?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...
  • Polls Archive

Top Articles for Residents

  • Applications Open for Resident Members of ENTtoday Edit Board
  • How To Provide Helpful Feedback To Residents
  • Call for Resident Bowl Questions
  • New Standardized Otolaryngology Curriculum Launching July 1 Should Be Valuable Resource For Physicians Around The World
  • Do Training Programs Give Otolaryngology Residents the Necessary Tools to Do Productive Research?
  • Popular this Week
  • Most Popular
  • Most Recent
    • A Journey Through Pay Inequity: A Physician’s Firsthand Account

    • The Dramatic Rise in Tongue Tie and Lip Tie Treatment

    • Otolaryngologists Are Still Debating the Effectiveness of Tongue Tie Treatment

    • Is Middle Ear Pressure Affected by Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Use?

    • Rating Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Severity: How Do Two Common Instruments Compare?

    • The Dramatic Rise in Tongue Tie and Lip Tie Treatment

    • Rating Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Severity: How Do Two Common Instruments Compare?

    • Is Middle Ear Pressure Affected by Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Use?

    • Otolaryngologists Are Still Debating the Effectiveness of Tongue Tie Treatment

    • Complications for When Physicians Change a Maiden Name

    • Excitement Around Gene Therapy for Hearing Restoration
    • “Small” Acts of Kindness
    • How To: Endoscopic Total Maxillectomy Without Facial Skin Incision
    • Science Communities Must Speak Out When Policies Threaten Health and Safety
    • Observation Most Cost-Effective in Addressing AECRS in Absence of Bacterial Infection

Follow Us

  • Contact Us
  • About Us
  • Advertise
  • The Triological Society
  • The Laryngoscope
  • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • Cookies

Wiley

Copyright © 2025 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies. ISSN 1559-4939