• Home
  • Practice Focus
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
    • How I Do It
    • TRIO Best Practices
  • Business of Medicine
    • Health Policy
    • Legal Matters
    • Practice Management
    • Tech Talk
    • AI
  • Literature Reviews
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
  • Career
    • Medical Education
    • Professional Development
    • Resident Focus
  • ENT Perspectives
    • ENT Expressions
    • Everyday Ethics
    • From TRIO
    • The Great Debate
    • Letter From the Editor
    • Rx: Wellness
    • The Voice
    • Viewpoint
  • TRIO Resources
    • Triological Society
    • The Laryngoscope
    • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
    • TRIO Combined Sections Meetings
    • COSM
    • Related Otolaryngology Events
  • Search

The Role of Checkpoint Inhibitors in the Treatment of Head and Neck Cancer

by Jennifer L.W. Fink • September 18, 2016

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
Print-Friendly Version

Indeed, immunotherapy can now be considered the fourth modality of head and neck cancer treatment, Dr. Brizel said. “The traditional platform for treating head and neck has been a table with three legs, surgery, radiotherapy, and chemotherapy. Immunotherapy, in essence, brings a fourth leg to the table.”

You Might Also Like

  • A Look at Immunotherapy’s Potential for Head and Neck Cancer Treatment
  • Researchers Find Strong Association Between TERT Antigens and Elevated B Cells in Head and Neck Cancer
  • New Treatment for Head and Neck Cancer Means Longer-Lasting Toxicity
  • Targeted Therapy a Potential Treatment for Head and Neck Cancer
Explore This Issue
September 2016

Monitoring Patients on Checkpoint Inhibitors

Checkpoint inhibitors are generally well tolerated. In fact, many patients experience fewer adverse events than they did on standard chemotherapy. The most common side effects include fatigue, mild diarrhea, and skin rash or itching.

More serious side effects include pneumonitis, colitis, and endocrine system dysfunction. “About 9% of patients experience immune-mediated toxicity,” Dr. Gillison said. “Those are the ones that can be particularly life-threatening, particularly pneumonitis and colitis.”

Red flag symptoms include difficulty breathing, hypoxia, cough (with no obvious cause), and an increase of four or more bowel movements per day above the patient’s baseline. If these symptoms occur in a patient on checkpoint inhibitors, immediate attention is needed. “If symptoms are severe enough to be life-threatening, you may have to stop the therapy permanently. Other times, you can hold it and see if symptoms improve. You may also need to give steroids to suppress the immune system and treat the side effect,” said Pavlos Msaouel, MD, PhD, oncology fellow at MD Anderson and co-author (with Dr. Massarelli) of a 2016 article (Cancer J. 2016;22:108-116).

There is some data to suggest that tumors that have frequent mutations in them are more likely to generate tumor-specific neoantigens that T-cells can recognize as foreign in attack. There have been studies showing that the higher the number of mutations in the tumor, the more robust the response to checkpoint inhibitors. —Maura Gillison, MD, PhD

Thyroid dysfunction occurs in approximately 16% of patients, said Dr. Msaouel, so patient thyroid function levels should be monitored during treatment; supplemental thyroid hormone should be given as necessary. Because checkpoint inhibitors can affect the liver as well, liver function tests should be checked. Be alert for hypophysitis; very rarely, the pituitary gland is affected.

Most patients, though, tolerate the medication extremely well. In fact, in the CheckMate-141 study, the patients treated with nivolumab experienced a better quality of life than patients treated with the chemotherapy regimen. They “had sustained physical, emotional, and social functioning, whereas the patients treated with chemotherapy had significant declines,” Dr. Gillison said. “So not only did we see an improvement in survival, but we saw a 60% reduction in moderate to severe toxicity and market stability in quality of life outcomes.”

The Future

Ongoing and upcoming clinical trials hope to answer many unanswered questions, such as when to begin and stop checkpoint inhibition and how to best combine checkpoint inhibitors with chemotherapy, radiation, and other immune-oncology agents. New checkpoint inhibitors are being studied, and researchers are working to better understand the physiology of head and neck tumors, hoping to identify a biomarker that can help physicians determine which patients are likely to benefit from checkpoint inhibition.

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 | Single Page

Filed Under: Head and Neck, Home Slider, Special Report Tagged With: checkpoint inhibitors, head and neck cancer, immunotherapy, treatmentIssue: September 2016

You Might Also Like:

  • A Look at Immunotherapy’s Potential for Head and Neck Cancer Treatment
  • Researchers Find Strong Association Between TERT Antigens and Elevated B Cells in Head and Neck Cancer
  • New Treatment for Head and Neck Cancer Means Longer-Lasting Toxicity
  • Targeted Therapy a Potential Treatment for Head and Neck Cancer

The Triological SocietyENTtoday is a publication of The Triological Society.

Polls

Would you choose a concierge physician as your PCP?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...
  • Polls Archive

Top Articles for Residents

  • Applications Open for Resident Members of ENTtoday Edit Board
  • How To Provide Helpful Feedback To Residents
  • Call for Resident Bowl Questions
  • New Standardized Otolaryngology Curriculum Launching July 1 Should Be Valuable Resource For Physicians Around The World
  • Do Training Programs Give Otolaryngology Residents the Necessary Tools to Do Productive Research?
  • Popular this Week
  • Most Popular
  • Most Recent
    • A Journey Through Pay Inequity: A Physician’s Firsthand Account

    • The Dramatic Rise in Tongue Tie and Lip Tie Treatment

    • Otolaryngologists Are Still Debating the Effectiveness of Tongue Tie Treatment

    • Is Middle Ear Pressure Affected by Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Use?

    • Rating Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Severity: How Do Two Common Instruments Compare?

    • The Dramatic Rise in Tongue Tie and Lip Tie Treatment

    • Rating Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Severity: How Do Two Common Instruments Compare?

    • Is Middle Ear Pressure Affected by Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Use?

    • Otolaryngologists Are Still Debating the Effectiveness of Tongue Tie Treatment

    • Complications for When Physicians Change a Maiden Name

    • Excitement Around Gene Therapy for Hearing Restoration
    • “Small” Acts of Kindness
    • How To: Endoscopic Total Maxillectomy Without Facial Skin Incision
    • Science Communities Must Speak Out When Policies Threaten Health and Safety
    • Observation Most Cost-Effective in Addressing AECRS in Absence of Bacterial Infection

Follow Us

  • Contact Us
  • About Us
  • Advertise
  • The Triological Society
  • The Laryngoscope
  • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • Cookies

Wiley

Copyright © 2025 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies. ISSN 1559-4939