ENTtoday
  • Home
  • Practice Focus
    • Allergy
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
  • Departments
    • Issue Archive
    • TRIO Best Practices
      • Allergy
      • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
      • Head and Neck
      • Laryngology
      • Otology/Neurotology
      • Pediatric
      • Rhinology
      • Sleep Medicine
    • Career Development
    • Case of the Month
    • Everyday Ethics
    • Health Policy
    • Legal Matters
    • Letter From the Editor
    • Medical Education
    • Online Exclusives
    • Practice Management
    • Resident Focus
    • Special Reports
    • Tech Talk
    • Viewpoint
    • What’s Your O.R. Playlist?
  • Literature Reviews
    • Allergy
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
  • Multimedia
    • Video
    • Audio
  • Events
    • Featured Events
    • TRIO Meetings
  • Contact Us
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Triological Society
    • Advertising Staff
    • Subscribe
    • eNewsletters
  • Advertise
    • Place an Ad
    • Classifieds
    • Rate Card
  • Search

Salvage Surgery in Head and Neck Cancers

by Tom Collins • April 5, 2015

  • Tweet
  • Email
Print-Friendly Version
Salvage Surgery in Head and Neck Cancers

Image Credit: Living Art Enterprises/Science Source

The role of salvage surgery in patients with head and neck cancer is not a black and white issue but a complex one with high stakes for patients. Panelists gathered to take on the topic at the 2015 Triological Society Combined Sections Meeting, discussing the role of imaging in making the decision, recurrence management at the primary site and in the case of regional recurrence, and nonsurgical options.

You might also like:

  • PET/CT Useful for Head and Neck Cancers, with Limitations
  • HN Cancer Patients with Negative Imaging History Derive Limited Benefit from Subsequent PET-CT
  • PET-Directed Management of Node-Positive Head and Neck Cancers
  • Keeping Watch for Skin Cancers on the Head and Neck
Explore this issue:
April 2015

Data on outcomes with salvage surgery make it clear that the procedure shouldn’t be treated as a fallback option—simply a way out if a first attempt at treatment fails, said panel moderator Randal Weber, MD, chair of head and neck surgery at the University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center in Houston. “With the exception of the larynx, patients don’t do very well if they fail the initial treatment,” he said. “I think it’s so important that we do the right thing initially for our patients to avoid the salvage scenario.”

When head and neck cancer recurs, options include salvage surgery with radiation or re-irradiation, single-modality radiation or re-irradiation with or without chemotherapy, or symptom management and palliative care.

When thinking about salvage surgery, physicians should be sure to consider the patient’s fitness for surgery, rule out distant metastases using positron emission tomography-computed tomography (PET-CT), provide realistic expectations to patients regarding the chances of a cure and their function after surgery, investigate the feasibility of the procedure, and take into account the possible need for reconstruction.

Role of Imaging

Surveillance is crucial for detecting the need for additional surgery early, and any change in symptoms should be considered recurrence until it’s proven not to be. Additionally, surveillance has to be individualized to account for specific patients’ circumstances, said Karen Pitman, MD, a head and neck surgeon with Banner Health in Arizona.

With the exception of the larynx, patients don’t do very well if they fail the initial treatment. I think it’s so important that we do the right thing initially for our patients to avoid the salvage scenario.

—Randal Weber, MD

National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) guidelines suggest obtaining baseline imaging within six months of the initial procedure, but there are no guidelines beyond six months. Additional imaging should be guided by a change in symptoms and physical exams.

Baseline imaging is a way to account for treatment-related scarring, fibrosis, and inflammation. PET-CT is superior to CT-MRI alone in detecting residual disease, with a sensitivity of 94%, a negative predictive value of 95%, a specificity of 82%, and a positive predictive value of 75%. Reasons for false positives can include performance of imaging too soon after treatment, inflammation, infection, and normal physiological uptake of the tracer used.

Pages: 1 2 3 4 Single Page

Filed Under: Features, Head and Neck, Practice Focus Tagged With: carcinoma, salvage, Triological Combined Sections MeetingIssue: April 2015

You might also like:

  • PET/CT Useful for Head and Neck Cancers, with Limitations
  • HN Cancer Patients with Negative Imaging History Derive Limited Benefit from Subsequent PET-CT
  • PET-Directed Management of Node-Positive Head and Neck Cancers
  • Keeping Watch for Skin Cancers on the Head and Neck

The Triological SocietyENTtoday is a publication of The Triological Society.

The Laryngoscope
Ensure you have all the latest research at your fingertips; Subscribe to The Laryngoscope today!

Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
Open access journal in otolaryngology – head and neck surgery is currently accepting submissions.

Classifieds

View the classified ads »

TRIO Best Practices

View the TRIO Best Practices »

Top Articles for Residents

  • How Writing Helps a Medical Resident Better Care for Patients
  • How Physicians Can Build a Network to Boost Their Career
  • How To Survive the First Year of Medical Residency
  • ACGME Revises Cap on Resident Work Hours
  • Ethical Implications of Burnout in Otolaryngology Residents
  • Popular this Week
  • Most Popular
  • Most Recent
    • Vertigo in the Elderly: What Does It Mean?
    • New Developments in the Management of Eustachian Tube Dysfunction
    • Is There a Crisis in the Otolaryngology Match?
    • Counseling Patients on Safe Nasal Irrigation
    • Weaning Patients Off of PPIs
    • New Developments in the Management of Eustachian Tube Dysfunction
    • Vertigo in the Elderly: What Does It Mean?
    • Eustachian Tuboplasty: A Potential New Option for Chronic Tube Dysfunction and Patulous Disease
    • Some Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Resists PPI Treatment
    • Short-and Long-Term Data Suggest Efficacy of Turbinate Ablation
    • Counseling Patients on Safe Nasal Irrigation
    • Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning in Otolaryngology
    • Letter from the Editor: Peer Reviewing Sensational Headlines
    • Is Topical Epinephrine Safe for Hemostasis in Endoscopic Sinus Surgery?
    • Is it Safe to Kiss in Era of HPV Head and Neck Cancer ‘Epidemic’?

Polls

Is artificial intelligence an advantage for medicine?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...
  • Polls Archive
  • Home
  • Contact Us
  • Advertise
  • Privacy Policy

Visit: The Triological Society • The Laryngoscope • Triological Meeting Posters

Wiley
© 2019 The Triological Society. All Rights Reserved.
ISSN 1559-4939

loading Cancel
Post was not sent - check your email addresses!
Email check failed, please try again
Sorry, your blog cannot share posts by email.
This site uses cookies: Find out more.