• Home
  • Practice Focus
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
    • How I Do It
    • TRIO Best Practices
  • Business of Medicine
    • Health Policy
    • Legal Matters
    • Practice Management
    • Tech Talk
    • AI
  • Literature Reviews
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
  • Career
    • Medical Education
    • Professional Development
    • Resident Focus
  • ENT Perspectives
    • ENT Expressions
    • Everyday Ethics
    • From TRIO
    • The Great Debate
    • Letter From the Editor
    • Rx: Wellness
    • The Voice
    • Viewpoint
  • TRIO Resources
    • Triological Society
    • The Laryngoscope
    • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
    • TRIO Combined Sections Meetings
    • COSM
    • Related Otolaryngology Events
  • Search

Sialendoscopy Updates: A Look at New Technology, Cost, and Frequency of Use

by Karen Appold • October 19, 2021

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
Print-Friendly Version

Before the FDA approved sialendoscopy in 2005, treatments for chronic obstructive salivary disease were quite limited. Antibiotics, steroids, and salivary stimulants were used in an attempt to resolve an infection or inflammation caused by an obstruction.

You Might Also Like

  • Is Sialendoscopy an Effective Treatment for Obstructive Salivary Gland Disease?
  • Case Report: Robotic-Assisted Transoral Removal of Submandibular Megalith
  • Sialendoscopy: On the Brink of Prime Time in the US?
  • Sialendoscopy Treatment for Juvenile Recurrent Parotitis Safe, Effective
Explore This Issue
October 2021

In some fortunate patients, simply expressing an obstructive stone out of the duct was possible, said Kenneth Hsu, MD, an otolaryngologist at The ENT & Allergy Centers of Texas in Plano. But for many patients, either an open surgical excision of a stone or, even worse, removing the gland would be needed to fully address the condition.

Procedures had significant potential complications and long-term consequences. Glands or ducts could be damaged, leading to further chronic obstructive disease that required gland removal. Surgery can risk nerve damage, and without a salivary gland, an individual can have dry mouth, visible facial and neck scars, and soft tissue deformity, Dr. Hsu said.

Sialendoscopy offers minimal risk, downtime, and adverse long-term consequences via a minimally invasive approach. “It’s an elegant solution to obstructive salivary disease, and in the right circumstances it can be nothing short of miraculous,” Dr. Hsu said. “There is no other satisfactory solution for patients with this disease.”

So how often is this game-changing procedure performed today since first being described in the 1990s (Ann Radiol (Paris). 1991;34:110-113), what newer technologies are available in the field, and how much does it cost to add the specialty to a practice?

Frequency of Use

It was once thought that when a salivary gland was obstructed due to a stone or stenosis, it had to be removed. However, scientific research has shown that when a stone is removed or stenosis is resolved, a gland will continue to show valuable function (Laryngoscope. 2009;119:646-652).

Sialendoscopy has grown tremendously in availability in the United States since receiving FDA approval. Studies have shown that it’s a safe and effective procedure for managing ductal pathologies of salivary glands (Sialendoscopy. Medscape. Nov. 30, 2017; Int J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2016;5:28-33).

Approximately 100 or more centers or practices in the United States now offer this procedure, and a growing number of otolaryngology surgeons and oral maxillofacial surgeons are being trained in sialendoscopy in their residency programs, said Rohan R. Walvekar, MD, a clinical professor in the department of otolaryngology–head and neck surgery at Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center in New Orleans.

One reason it isn’t performed more widely is that there aren’t any specific CPT codes reflecting this newer procedure’s value. “It can be very time intensive, and the procedure isn’t reimbursed as adequately as other, comparable new techniques such as balloon sinuplasty,” said J. Randall Jordan, MD, a professor in the department of otolaryngology–head and neck surgery at the University of Mississippi Medical Center in Jackson.

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 | Single Page

Filed Under: Features, Home Slider, Laryngology Tagged With: salivary glands, treatmentIssue: October 2021

You Might Also Like:

  • Is Sialendoscopy an Effective Treatment for Obstructive Salivary Gland Disease?
  • Case Report: Robotic-Assisted Transoral Removal of Submandibular Megalith
  • Sialendoscopy: On the Brink of Prime Time in the US?
  • Sialendoscopy Treatment for Juvenile Recurrent Parotitis Safe, Effective

The Triological SocietyENTtoday is a publication of The Triological Society.

Polls

Would you choose a concierge physician as your PCP?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...
  • Polls Archive

Top Articles for Residents

  • Applications Open for Resident Members of ENTtoday Edit Board
  • How To Provide Helpful Feedback To Residents
  • Call for Resident Bowl Questions
  • New Standardized Otolaryngology Curriculum Launching July 1 Should Be Valuable Resource For Physicians Around The World
  • Do Training Programs Give Otolaryngology Residents the Necessary Tools to Do Productive Research?
  • Popular this Week
  • Most Popular
  • Most Recent
    • The Dramatic Rise in Tongue Tie and Lip Tie Treatment

    • Otolaryngologists Are Still Debating the Effectiveness of Tongue Tie Treatment

    • Excitement Around Gene Therapy for Hearing Restoration

    • Is Middle Ear Pressure Affected by Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Use?

    • Rating Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Severity: How Do Two Common Instruments Compare?

    • The Dramatic Rise in Tongue Tie and Lip Tie Treatment

    • Rating Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Severity: How Do Two Common Instruments Compare?

    • Is Middle Ear Pressure Affected by Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Use?

    • Otolaryngologists Are Still Debating the Effectiveness of Tongue Tie Treatment

    • Complications for When Physicians Change a Maiden Name

    • Excitement Around Gene Therapy for Hearing Restoration
    • “Small” Acts of Kindness
    • How To: Endoscopic Total Maxillectomy Without Facial Skin Incision
    • Science Communities Must Speak Out When Policies Threaten Health and Safety
    • Observation Most Cost-Effective in Addressing AECRS in Absence of Bacterial Infection

Follow Us

  • Contact Us
  • About Us
  • Advertise
  • The Triological Society
  • The Laryngoscope
  • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • Cookies

Wiley

Copyright © 2025 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies. ISSN 1559-4939