• Home
  • Practice Focus
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
    • How I Do It
    • TRIO Best Practices
  • Business of Medicine
    • Health Policy
    • Legal Matters
    • Practice Management
    • Tech Talk
    • AI
  • Literature Reviews
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
  • Career
    • Medical Education
    • Professional Development
    • Resident Focus
  • ENT Perspectives
    • ENT Expressions
    • Everyday Ethics
    • From TRIO
    • The Great Debate
    • Letter From the Editor
    • Rx: Wellness
    • The Voice
    • Viewpoint
  • TRIO Resources
    • Triological Society
    • The Laryngoscope
    • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
    • TRIO Combined Sections Meetings
    • COSM
    • Related Otolaryngology Events
  • Search

So You Want to Be a Surgeon-Scientist?

by Stephanie Shintani Smith, MD, MS • March 11, 2020

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
Print-Friendly Version

A surgeon-scientist in otolaryngology is uniquely able to address clinical needs, identify gaps in knowledge, design and execute experiments, and translate discoveries from bench to bedside. Otolaryngology residency does not typically provide the training necessary for a surgeon to develop into an independently funded scientist. As otolaryngologists, we often have result-oriented personalities, and the long road to independent and successful science is challenging. It requires further training, the humility to accept direction, the resiliency to seek funding, and the fortune to have a supportive academic environment.

You Might Also Like

  • The Decline of the Surgeon­–Scientist
  • The Decline of the Surgeon Scientist
  • Five Ways to Improve Surgeon Participation in Medical Research
  • The Physician-Scientist Model: Does It Work in Our Specialty?
Explore This Issue
March 2020

Training for Research

During the four-month research block in my third year of residency, I participated in basic science and clinical research projects. I wrote and obtained a Centralized Otolaryngology Research Efforts (CORE) resident research grant through the American Academy of Otolaryngology—Head and Neck Surgery Foundation, which was my introduction into the realm of funding. Like many residents, however, I didn’t know what I didn’t know. But, I was fortunate to have a mentor with perspective beyond mine at the time. Dr. Robert Kern is the chairman of otolaryngology at Northwestern University, and I as progressed through residency, he encouraged me to explore my interests in research.

As a chief resident, I had excellent surgical training but hardly, if any, formal training in how to do research professionally. Dr. Kern introduced me to Dr. Jane Holl, a pediatrician and, at the time, director of Northwestern’s Center for Healthcare Studies. I had the opportunity to stay on as junior faculty in otolaryngology and as a concurrent fellow in the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ), within the Ruth L. Kirschstein Institutional National Service Research Award (NRSA) T32 program. (A T32 is an institutional training grant program sponsored by the NIH, AHRQ, or other national body.)

Why Protected Time Is Vital

During the fellowship, I earned a master’s degree in health services and outcomes research. For those two years, I had 75% protected time for research, and was able to start my clinical practice with two half-days in clinic and a half-day in the OR per week. “Protected time” refers to the amount of working time reserved for research or research training, that should not be consumed by other work such as clinical, educational, or administrative duties. The T32 and approximately $20,000 per year of departmental research startup funds supported a part-time research assistant, statistical support, database acquisition, and analytical software, all of which I learned to use through my fellowship training. Perhaps the biggest asset from that time was the opportunity to have mentors and co-investigators in both the surgical and non-surgical divisions (such as in social sciences, internal medicine, and epidemiology). This formal research training and phenomenal mentorship from Dr. Holl were essential to my development as a scientist.

Professional research is a very different world from the operating room, and the next steps towards higher level grant funding were challenging. During my fellowship, I prepared and submitted a KL2 grant proposal. (K awards are mentored career development awards that are typically sponsored by the NIH, AHRQ, or other national body.)

Pages: 1 2 3 | Single Page

Filed Under: Viewpoints Tagged With: career development, clinical research, medical careerIssue: March 2020

You Might Also Like:

  • The Decline of the Surgeon­–Scientist
  • The Decline of the Surgeon Scientist
  • Five Ways to Improve Surgeon Participation in Medical Research
  • The Physician-Scientist Model: Does It Work in Our Specialty?

The Triological SocietyENTtoday is a publication of The Triological Society.

Polls

Would you choose a concierge physician as your PCP?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...
  • Polls Archive

Top Articles for Residents

  • Applications Open for Resident Members of ENTtoday Edit Board
  • How To Provide Helpful Feedback To Residents
  • Call for Resident Bowl Questions
  • New Standardized Otolaryngology Curriculum Launching July 1 Should Be Valuable Resource For Physicians Around The World
  • Do Training Programs Give Otolaryngology Residents the Necessary Tools to Do Productive Research?
  • Popular this Week
  • Most Popular
  • Most Recent
    • A Journey Through Pay Inequity: A Physician’s Firsthand Account

    • The Dramatic Rise in Tongue Tie and Lip Tie Treatment

    • Otolaryngologists Are Still Debating the Effectiveness of Tongue Tie Treatment

    • Is Middle Ear Pressure Affected by Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Use?

    • Rating Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Severity: How Do Two Common Instruments Compare?

    • The Dramatic Rise in Tongue Tie and Lip Tie Treatment

    • Rating Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Severity: How Do Two Common Instruments Compare?

    • Is Middle Ear Pressure Affected by Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Use?

    • Otolaryngologists Are Still Debating the Effectiveness of Tongue Tie Treatment

    • Complications for When Physicians Change a Maiden Name

    • Excitement Around Gene Therapy for Hearing Restoration
    • “Small” Acts of Kindness
    • How To: Endoscopic Total Maxillectomy Without Facial Skin Incision
    • Science Communities Must Speak Out When Policies Threaten Health and Safety
    • Observation Most Cost-Effective in Addressing AECRS in Absence of Bacterial Infection

Follow Us

  • Contact Us
  • About Us
  • Advertise
  • The Triological Society
  • The Laryngoscope
  • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • Cookies

Wiley

Copyright © 2025 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies. ISSN 1559-4939