• Home
  • Practice Focus
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
    • How I Do It
    • TRIO Best Practices
  • Business of Medicine
    • Health Policy
    • Legal Matters
    • Practice Management
    • Tech Talk
    • AI
  • Literature Reviews
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
  • Career
    • Medical Education
    • Professional Development
    • Resident Focus
  • ENT Perspectives
    • ENT Expressions
    • Everyday Ethics
    • From TRIO
    • The Great Debate
    • Letter From the Editor
    • Rx: Wellness
    • The Voice
    • Viewpoint
  • TRIO Resources
    • Triological Society
    • The Laryngoscope
    • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
    • TRIO Combined Sections Meetings
    • COSM
    • Related Otolaryngology Events
  • Search

State Efforts Toward Universal Coverage: Part 2 of a series

by Marlene Piturro, PhD, MBA • May 1, 2007

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
Print-Friendly Version

California

Drawing on Massachusetts’ template to cover the uninsured, California’s proposal requires employers with 10 workers or more to buy insurance for their employees or pay a 4% payroll tax, physicians to pay 2% of their gross revenues, and levies a 4% tax on hospitals. Insurers would be prohibited from excluding applicants with pre-existing conditions and from spending more than 15% on administrative costs. Gov. Schwarzenegger plans to subsidize coverage of the nearly one in five uninsured Californians with the tax revenues mentioned above. He also plans to expand the SCHIP program by subsidizing families of four earning up to $60,000.

You Might Also Like

  • What If They Gave Universal Coverage and No Doctors Came?
  • Covering the Uninsured-Searching for a Solution: Part 1 of a series
  • Health Reform to Insure 32 Million: Are you ready for them?
  • The Private Sector Pitches In for the Uninsured: Part 3 of a series
Explore This Issue
May 2007

Roger Crumley, MD, MBA, Professor of Otolaryngology/Head and Neck Surgery at the University of California-Irvine, has struggled with the state’s low Medicaid reimbursement (60% of Medicare), and wonders how many more low-fee patients he and others can take on. Many doctors here don’t take Medi-Cal or Medicare because each case loses money. While a 2 percent tax on physician gross incomes sounds terrible it might not be so bad because those who have opted out low payers would then have to cover those of us who do treat these patients.

Another issue is California’s high managed care penetration rates, which have added to physicians’ low reimbursement rates, even for complex procedures. Dr. Crumley explains: Orange County has capitated Medicaid. Let’s say it’s 35 cents PMPM for 20,000 lives-$7000 a month for otolaryngology. One radical neck surgery sinks you. As for the governor’s funding mechanism, taxes on physician and hospital revenues, Dr. Crumley calls it an opening gambit for the negotiation to ensure that he gets something passed. There’s also talk about sweetening Medi-Cal reimbursement, which would help providers.

Maine

By creating Dirigo Health Agency, a state regulatory agency responsible for health care, Maine acted in 2003 to become the first state to legislate for universal access. Maine anticipated covering all 131,000 of its uninsured by 2009 through three core initiatives: Medicaid expansion, a state-designed and subsidized health insurance plan for individuals and employers, and regulation/cost controls.

Dirigo’s coverage is available to uninsured individuals, businesses, and municipalities with 50 or fewer employees, and to the self-employed. It provides discounts on monthly premiums, deductibles, and out-of-pocket expenses on a sliding scale. Private health insurers offering coverage through Dirigo must include Maine’s 45 mandated benefits.

One of Maine’s most significant contributions to the national debate on how best to cover the uninsured is its insistence on costs controls as the way to liberate money to subsidize care. Reducing its $275 million bad debt and charity care, a one-year moratorium on capital expenditures, tighter rules for certificates of need, and strengthened oversight of insurance rates are among Dirigo’s cost controls. One of the more controversial was the voluntary cap on provider costs and operating margins. Dirigo requested hospitals to limit their cost growth to 3% per year and their operating margins to 3.5%, and insurers to cap operating margins at 3.5%.

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 | Single Page

Filed Under: Articles, Departments, Health Policy Issue: May 2007

You Might Also Like:

  • What If They Gave Universal Coverage and No Doctors Came?
  • Covering the Uninsured-Searching for a Solution: Part 1 of a series
  • Health Reform to Insure 32 Million: Are you ready for them?
  • The Private Sector Pitches In for the Uninsured: Part 3 of a series

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

The Triological SocietyENTtoday is a publication of The Triological Society.

Polls

Would you choose a concierge physician as your PCP?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...
  • Polls Archive

Top Articles for Residents

  • Applications Open for Resident Members of ENTtoday Edit Board
  • How To Provide Helpful Feedback To Residents
  • Call for Resident Bowl Questions
  • New Standardized Otolaryngology Curriculum Launching July 1 Should Be Valuable Resource For Physicians Around The World
  • Do Training Programs Give Otolaryngology Residents the Necessary Tools to Do Productive Research?
  • Popular this Week
  • Most Popular
  • Most Recent
    • A Journey Through Pay Inequity: A Physician’s Firsthand Account

    • The Dramatic Rise in Tongue Tie and Lip Tie Treatment

    • Otolaryngologists Are Still Debating the Effectiveness of Tongue Tie Treatment

    • Is Middle Ear Pressure Affected by Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Use?

    • Rating Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Severity: How Do Two Common Instruments Compare?

    • The Dramatic Rise in Tongue Tie and Lip Tie Treatment

    • Rating Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Severity: How Do Two Common Instruments Compare?

    • Is Middle Ear Pressure Affected by Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Use?

    • Otolaryngologists Are Still Debating the Effectiveness of Tongue Tie Treatment

    • Complications for When Physicians Change a Maiden Name

    • Excitement Around Gene Therapy for Hearing Restoration
    • “Small” Acts of Kindness
    • How To: Endoscopic Total Maxillectomy Without Facial Skin Incision
    • Science Communities Must Speak Out When Policies Threaten Health and Safety
    • Observation Most Cost-Effective in Addressing AECRS in Absence of Bacterial Infection

Follow Us

  • Contact Us
  • About Us
  • Advertise
  • The Triological Society
  • The Laryngoscope
  • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • Cookies

Wiley

Copyright © 2025 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies. ISSN 1559-4939