• Home
  • Practice Focus
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
    • How I Do It
    • TRIO Best Practices
  • Business of Medicine
    • Health Policy
    • Legal Matters
    • Practice Management
    • Tech Talk
    • AI
  • Literature Reviews
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
  • Career
    • Medical Education
    • Professional Development
    • Resident Focus
  • ENT Perspectives
    • ENT Expressions
    • Everyday Ethics
    • From TRIO
    • The Great Debate
    • Letter From the Editor
    • Rx: Wellness
    • The Voice
    • Viewpoint
  • TRIO Resources
    • Triological Society
    • The Laryngoscope
    • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
    • TRIO Combined Sections Meetings
    • COSM
    • Related Otolaryngology Events
  • Search

Sudden Hearing Loss a Risk for People Taking Phosphodiesterase-5 Inhibitors

by Mary Beth Nierengarten • June 1, 2014

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
Print-Friendly Version

You Might Also Like

  • Increasing Evidence that PDE-5 Inhibitors Can Cause Hearing Loss
  • Optimal Usage of Intratympanic Drug Therapy for Sudden Hearing Loss Unclear
  • Sudden Hearing Loss: Clinical Guideline Update
  • Pills vs. Injections: Which Steroids Are Best for Sudden Hearing Loss?
Explore This Issue
June 2014

In 2007, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) required the labeling on the phosphodiesterase-5 (PDE-5) inhibitors to display more prominently the potential risk for sudden hearing loss associated with all agents in this class (i.e., sildenafil, tadalafil, and vardenafil).

This change came on the heels of a case report of sudden hearing loss in a man taking sildenafil, which in turn prompted an FDA investigation of the post-marketing data of these agents and resulted in the discovery of 23 cases of sudden hearing loss thought to be associated with these agents (J Laryngol Otol. 2007;121:395-397).

Since these initial reports, additional evidence continues to document cases of sudden hearing loss in people taking PDE-5 inhibitors. To date, none of the evidence has established causality, and the mechanism of action remains unclear; however, what does appear evident is support for the recognition that sudden hearing loss may be a real risk in people who take PDE-5 inhibitors. Otolaryngologists should take this into consideration when seeing patients who present with sudden hearing loss.

The Evidence So Far

The evidence for an association between PDE-5 inhibitors and sudden hearing loss comes from case reports, one large epidemiological study, and reviews of postmarketing data. In a 2009 report, investigators reviewed two cases of sudden hearing loss from PDE-5 inhibitors along with the FDA postmarketing data in 23 patients (Laryngoscope. 2009;119:1586-1589). Given the retrospective nature of the study and incomplete data from the FDA, as well as the inability to address the potential for confounding variables for sudden hearing loss and comorbidities, the study reported inconclusive findings of the relationship between PDE-5 inhibitor use and sudden hearing loss.

Co-author James E. Saunders, MD, assistant professor of surgery in the division of otolaryngology at Dartmouth Medical School, Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center in Lebanon, N.H., is concerned about the current evidence, saying that it is limited by the retrospective nature of most of the studies and the lack of randomized clinical data. “The problem with case reports is that these drugs are widely used and so there may be reported cases just because the exposure of the drug is so high,” he said.

A report on epidemiological data from more than 11,000 men aged 40 years and older that did adjust for confounding variables concluded that men reporting hearing impairment were more likely to also report using any of the PDE-5 inhibitors (odds ratio [OR] of 2.23, 95% CI, 1.36-3.66) (Arch Otolaryngol Head and Neck Surg. 2010;136:488-492). This association persisted after adjusting for potential confounding variables, including sociodemographic, behavioral, and health-related characteristics.

Pages: 1 2 3 4 | Single Page

Filed Under: Departments, Otology/Neurotology, Practice Focus, Special Reports Tagged With: hearing lossIssue: June 2014

You Might Also Like:

  • Increasing Evidence that PDE-5 Inhibitors Can Cause Hearing Loss
  • Optimal Usage of Intratympanic Drug Therapy for Sudden Hearing Loss Unclear
  • Sudden Hearing Loss: Clinical Guideline Update
  • Pills vs. Injections: Which Steroids Are Best for Sudden Hearing Loss?

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

The Triological SocietyENTtoday is a publication of The Triological Society.

Polls

Would you choose a concierge physician as your PCP?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...
  • Polls Archive

Top Articles for Residents

  • Applications Open for Resident Members of ENTtoday Edit Board
  • How To Provide Helpful Feedback To Residents
  • Call for Resident Bowl Questions
  • New Standardized Otolaryngology Curriculum Launching July 1 Should Be Valuable Resource For Physicians Around The World
  • Do Training Programs Give Otolaryngology Residents the Necessary Tools to Do Productive Research?
  • Popular this Week
  • Most Popular
  • Most Recent
    • A Journey Through Pay Inequity: A Physician’s Firsthand Account

    • The Dramatic Rise in Tongue Tie and Lip Tie Treatment

    • Otolaryngologists Are Still Debating the Effectiveness of Tongue Tie Treatment

    • Is Middle Ear Pressure Affected by Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Use?

    • Rating Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Severity: How Do Two Common Instruments Compare?

    • The Dramatic Rise in Tongue Tie and Lip Tie Treatment

    • Rating Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Severity: How Do Two Common Instruments Compare?

    • Is Middle Ear Pressure Affected by Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Use?

    • Otolaryngologists Are Still Debating the Effectiveness of Tongue Tie Treatment

    • Complications for When Physicians Change a Maiden Name

    • Excitement Around Gene Therapy for Hearing Restoration
    • “Small” Acts of Kindness
    • How To: Endoscopic Total Maxillectomy Without Facial Skin Incision
    • Science Communities Must Speak Out When Policies Threaten Health and Safety
    • Observation Most Cost-Effective in Addressing AECRS in Absence of Bacterial Infection

Follow Us

  • Contact Us
  • About Us
  • Advertise
  • The Triological Society
  • The Laryngoscope
  • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • Cookies

Wiley

Copyright © 2025 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies. ISSN 1559-4939