• Home
  • Practice Focus
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
    • How I Do It
    • TRIO Best Practices
  • Business of Medicine
    • Health Policy
    • Legal Matters
    • Practice Management
    • Tech Talk
    • AI
  • Literature Reviews
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
  • Career
    • Medical Education
    • Professional Development
    • Resident Focus
  • ENT Perspectives
    • ENT Expressions
    • Everyday Ethics
    • From TRIO
    • The Great Debate
    • Letter From the Editor
    • Rx: Wellness
    • The Voice
    • Viewpoint
  • TRIO Resources
    • Triological Society
    • The Laryngoscope
    • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
    • TRIO Combined Sections Meetings
    • COSM
    • Related Otolaryngology Events
  • Search

Targeting Headaches: Trigger release surgery an option for patients with chronic migraine

by Jennifer L.W. Fink • April 27, 2011

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
Print-Friendly Version

Systematic BOTOX injections are used to gauge the likelihood of surgical success. “BOTOX can be used as a test to see if one might respond to surgery,” said Dr. Janis, who uses a strict algorithmic approach to inject BOTOX into the migraine trigger points in the clinic setting. “If the BOTOX works, that’s a good sign the patient may be a good candidate for surgery. If the BOTOX doesn’t work, surgery may not necessarily be the best option,” Dr. Janis said. According to Dr. Guyuron, patients who suffer from nasal contact migraines must have clear findings of contact either via CT scan or physical examination before being approved for surgery.

You Might Also Like

  • Functional Nasal Surgery Relieves Chronic Headache in Some Patients
  • Triptans Prove Helpful in Treating ‘Sinus Headaches
  • What Are the Diagnostic Criteria for Migraine-Associated Vertigo?
  • ESS Provides Better QOL for CRS Patients with Comorbid Migraine
Explore This Issue
May 2011

Surgical Technique

To relieve frontal trigger migraines, surgeons remove the glabellar muscle group, including the corrugator supercilii, depressor supercilii and procerus, through an upper eyelid incision, freeing the supraorbital and supratrochlear nerves. Temporal migraines are treated with the endoscopic removal of approximately three centimeters of the zygomaticotemporal branch of the trigeminal nerve to prevent its compression by the temporalis muscle (Plast Reconstr Surg. 2005;115(1):1-9; Plast Reconstr Surg. 2009;124(2):461-468).

Removal of a small section (approx. 1 cm X 2.5 cm) of the semispinalis capitis muscle is part of the treatment for occipital migraines. Surgeons also create a subcutaneous flap to shield the greater occipital nerve from irritation. “It’s kind of like doing a superficial parotidectomy,” Dr. Stepnick said. “But the nerve in the partotid, the facial nerve, is actually much smaller and has many smaller branches. I actually think it’s easier to do the migraine nerve. It’s easier to find, and the nerve is bigger.”

Intranasal trigger points are treated with septoplasty and turbinate work. “You try to make sure that the turbinate is not touching the septum,” Dr. Stepnick said. “There are different ways to do that, and you choose the way based on the patient. One option is a therapeutic outfracture. You can also do a submucosal resection to take out the bony part of the turbinate.”

A word of caution: The existence of contact points is not an absolute indication for surgery. “The severity of contact points, or even their presence, does not translate to headaches. Minor contact points can induce severe headaches,” said Dr. David Parsons, clinical professor of pediatric otolaryngology at the Universities of North and South Carolina. Any decision to perform intranasal migraine surgery should be based on a patient’s history, not just on the existence of contact points as demonstrated by CT scan, he said.

Complications

To date, surgical complications have been minimal. Three of 69 patients reported some occipital stiffness or weakness at five years; some patients experience hypo- or hypersensitivity along the supraorbital or supratrochlear nerves (Plast Reconstr Surg. 2011;127(2):603-608). “A couple of patients have told us that they have muscle tightness, but I’m not sure if that’s related to the surgery, because muscle tightness is part of what causes occipital migraine headaches anyway,” Dr. Guyuron said. Other possible complications include minor muscle hollowing, eyelid ptosis, scalp itching and minor hair loss. At five years post-surgery, none of the patients examined by Dr. Guyuron’s team reported intense itching or uneven eyebrow movement; 20 of 79 patients experienced very occasional itching (Plast Reconstr Surg. 2011;127(2):603-608).

Pages: 1 2 3 4 | Single Page

Filed Under: Everyday Ethics, Facial Plastic/Reconstructive, Head and Neck Tagged With: facial plastic surgery, head and neck surgery, migraineIssue: May 2011

You Might Also Like:

  • Functional Nasal Surgery Relieves Chronic Headache in Some Patients
  • Triptans Prove Helpful in Treating ‘Sinus Headaches
  • What Are the Diagnostic Criteria for Migraine-Associated Vertigo?
  • ESS Provides Better QOL for CRS Patients with Comorbid Migraine

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

The Triological SocietyENTtoday is a publication of The Triological Society.

Polls

Would you choose a concierge physician as your PCP?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...
  • Polls Archive

Top Articles for Residents

  • Applications Open for Resident Members of ENTtoday Edit Board
  • How To Provide Helpful Feedback To Residents
  • Call for Resident Bowl Questions
  • New Standardized Otolaryngology Curriculum Launching July 1 Should Be Valuable Resource For Physicians Around The World
  • Do Training Programs Give Otolaryngology Residents the Necessary Tools to Do Productive Research?
  • Popular this Week
  • Most Popular
  • Most Recent
    • A Journey Through Pay Inequity: A Physician’s Firsthand Account

    • The Dramatic Rise in Tongue Tie and Lip Tie Treatment

    • Otolaryngologists Are Still Debating the Effectiveness of Tongue Tie Treatment

    • Is Middle Ear Pressure Affected by Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Use?

    • Rating Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Severity: How Do Two Common Instruments Compare?

    • The Dramatic Rise in Tongue Tie and Lip Tie Treatment

    • Rating Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Severity: How Do Two Common Instruments Compare?

    • Is Middle Ear Pressure Affected by Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Use?

    • Otolaryngologists Are Still Debating the Effectiveness of Tongue Tie Treatment

    • Complications for When Physicians Change a Maiden Name

    • Excitement Around Gene Therapy for Hearing Restoration
    • “Small” Acts of Kindness
    • How To: Endoscopic Total Maxillectomy Without Facial Skin Incision
    • Science Communities Must Speak Out When Policies Threaten Health and Safety
    • Observation Most Cost-Effective in Addressing AECRS in Absence of Bacterial Infection

Follow Us

  • Contact Us
  • About Us
  • Advertise
  • The Triological Society
  • The Laryngoscope
  • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • Cookies

Wiley

Copyright © 2025 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies. ISSN 1559-4939