• Home
  • Practice Focus
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
    • How I Do It
    • TRIO Best Practices
  • Business of Medicine
    • Health Policy
    • Legal Matters
    • Practice Management
    • Technology
    • AI
    • History of Otolaryngology
  • Literature Reviews
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
  • Career
    • Medical Education
    • Professional Development
    • Resident Focus
  • ENT Perspectives
    • ENT Expressions
    • Everyday Ethics
    • From TRIO
    • The Great Debate
    • Letter From the Editor
    • Rx: Wellness
    • The Voice
    • Viewpoint
    • SUO Corner
  • TRIO Resources
    • Triological Society
    • The Laryngoscope
    • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
    • TRIO Combined Sections Meetings
    • COSM
    • Related Otolaryngology Events
  • Search

The Internet Says I’m Attractive

by Sue Pondrom • May 2, 2010

  • Tweet
  • Email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
Print-Friendly Version

Can facial attractiveness scores obtained from an Internet-based rating system correlate with and be an alternative for those accrued from the traditional focus group method?

You Might Also Like

  • Social Media-cine: Get your practice on board with an Internet policy
  • Functional Results Strongly Influence Postoperative Satisfaction in Patients Who Have Undergone Rhinoplasty
  • Nasal Lavage May Be a Valid Alternative to Swab Method in SARS-CoV-2 Detection
  • Facial Palsy Assessment Methodologies Not Consistent
Explore This Issue
May 2010

Background: Despite the extensive number of facial beauty studies, research has been unable to define facial beauty with more specific parameters. A significant limitation is the tedium and difficulty of obtaining large focus groups. Additionally, these groups can be biased with regard to social, economic, cultural, age and other factors.

Study Design: Statistical evaluation of Internet-based facial attractiveness ratings of synthetic facial portraits compared to traditional focus group ratings

Setting: Researchers from the University of California, Irvine utilized focus groups and the Internet site Hotornot.com.

Synopsis: With eight months of extensive logistical planning, 120 synthetic images were evaluated for facial attractiveness using traditional focus groups composed of beauticians trained in media concepts of facial beauty, otolaryngologists with a clinical knowledge of facial analysis and students without specific education in the field. The free website Hotornot.com was selected for the Internet portion of the study because it receives heavy traffic, automatically updates scores (with an average of 857 rates after only 21 days) and has a user-friendly interface. Rater count was increased an average of almost nine-fold, there were no logistical or monetary hurdles and very limited planning was involved. Comparing the two rating systems, the researchers found a strong and positive linear correlation, indicating that both methods agree on which portraits are more or less attractive than others. Limitations to the Internet approach included the unknown demographics of the raters, as well as possible sampling biases. However, these biases were also present in the traditional method and were reduced by accruing a large sample size.

Bottom Line: An Internet-based facial attractiveness rating system is an accurate and faster alternative to the inefficient traditional focus group rating method and can greatly increase the number and demographic variability of raters.

Citation: Devcic Z, Karimi K, Popenko N, et al. A Web-based method for rating facial attractiveness. Laryngoscope. 2010;120(5):902-906.

—Reviewed by Sue Pondrom

Filed Under: Facial Plastic/Reconstructive, Literature Reviews Tagged With: face, facial attractiveness, facial beauty, focus group, Internet, rating systemIssue: May 2010

You Might Also Like:

  • Social Media-cine: Get your practice on board with an Internet policy
  • Functional Results Strongly Influence Postoperative Satisfaction in Patients Who Have Undergone Rhinoplasty
  • Nasal Lavage May Be a Valid Alternative to Swab Method in SARS-CoV-2 Detection
  • Facial Palsy Assessment Methodologies Not Consistent

The Triological SocietyENTtoday is a publication of The Triological Society.

Polls

Have you used AI to submit documentation to insurance companies in response to a denial?

View Results

Loading ...
  • Polls Archive

Top Articles for Residents

  • Is the SLOR in Otolaryngology Residency Applications Contributing to Rural Disparities?
  • Applications Open for Resident Members of the ENTtoday Editorial Board: Deadline Extended
  • A Resident’s View of AI in Otolaryngology
  • Call for Resident Bowl Questions
  • Resident Pearls: Pediatric Otolaryngologists Share Tips for Safer, Smarter Tonsillectomies
  • Popular this Week
  • Most Popular
  • Most Recent
    • Some Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Resists PPI Treatment
    • Vocal Cord Leukoplakia Management Trends Include Advanced Surgical Techniques, Voice Preservation
    • Empty Nose Syndrome: Physiological, Psychological, or Perhaps a Little of Both?
    • The Dramatic Rise in Tongue Tie and Lip Tie Treatment
    • What Is the Extent of Neck Dissection in Medullary Thyroid Carcinoma?
    • The Dramatic Rise in Tongue Tie and Lip Tie Treatment
    • Rating Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Severity: How Do Two Common Instruments Compare?
    • Is Middle Ear Pressure Affected by Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Use?
    • Otolaryngologists Are Still Debating the Effectiveness of Tongue Tie Treatment
    • Complications for When Physicians Change a Maiden Name
    • The Battle of the Bots Comes to Prior Authorization
    • How to Avoid These 10 Difficult Airway Pitfalls
    • Getting Comfortable Being Uncomfortable
    • Comparative Study of TMRT for Chronic Otitis Media
    • Early and Sustained Improvements in Sense of Smell with Tezepelumab Treatment in Patients with CRSwNP (WAYPOINT)

Follow Us

  • Contact Us
  • About Us
  • Advertise
  • The Triological Society
  • The Laryngoscope
  • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • Cookies

Wiley

Copyright © 2026 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies. ISSN 1559-4939