• Home
  • Practice Focus
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
    • How I Do It
    • TRIO Best Practices
  • Business of Medicine
    • Health Policy
    • Legal Matters
    • Practice Management
    • Tech Talk
    • AI
  • Literature Reviews
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
  • Career
    • Medical Education
    • Professional Development
    • Resident Focus
  • ENT Perspectives
    • ENT Expressions
    • Everyday Ethics
    • From TRIO
    • The Great Debate
    • Letter From the Editor
    • Rx: Wellness
    • The Voice
    • Viewpoint
  • TRIO Resources
    • Triological Society
    • The Laryngoscope
    • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
    • TRIO Combined Sections Meetings
    • COSM
    • Related Otolaryngology Events
  • Search

The Mechanisms of Tinnitus: Research Progress and Treatment Implications

by Andrea M. Sattinger • December 1, 2008

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
Print-Friendly Version

Tinnitus, classically defined as the perception of sound that has no external source, and referred to by some as a phantom auditory perception, plagues as many as 50 million Americans, 12 million of them severely; and 2 to 4 million people are debilitated by it. For many years, progress toward effective treatments for tinnitus was hindered by an obscured understanding of its underlying physiologic mechanisms. Although tinnitus was presumed to be primarily a disorder of the ear, findings now are eliciting insights pointing to neurologic origins for tinnitus. Localization of brain activity is now possible by means of positron emission tomography (PET), single photon emission computer tomography (SPECT), functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI), and magnetoencephalographic studies (MEG). This research, coupled with intensive study in recently developed animal models, increasingly suggests that tinnitus is most commonly a disorder that can originate in the peripheral and/or central nervous system and brain, and can undoubtedly be triggered by injury to the ear.

You Might Also Like

  • Tinnitus Research Implicates Brain Structures in Hearing Disorder
  • Electrical Stimulation to Treat Tinnitus
  • Congress Mandates Better Reporting of Tinnitus Among United States Military
  • NIH Launches Clinical Study for Tinnitus Treatment
Explore This Issue
December 2008

Although there is no cure for tinnitus, research from around the world is probing tinnitus’s causes, potential therapies, and management. This intensive work is translating into successful tinnitus management: Up to 85% of treated patients cite a significant incidence of relief. But the perception of tinnitus is a very personal experience.

Tinnitus Components

Experts in tinnitus cite three major components of tinnitus: acoustic, affective, and motor response to the tinnitus sensation, all of which are attention-based. The three interact with each other to varying extents. For example, there is evidence that stress can worsen tinnitus and that tinnitus can interfere with a person’s ability to concentrate. There is also research concluding that tinnitus is caused by neural plastic changes, that there are regions of the brain where tinnitus-related activity has been identified, that there are clues regarding how hearing loss causes brain changes that underlie tinnitus, and that animal studies demonstrate that excessive sound stimulation causes chronic changes in neural activity in the auditory centers of the brain.

Experts recognize that the cascade of psychophysiologic and psychophysical mechanisms underlying tinnitus mandate a multidisciplinary approach incorporating a strong mind-body component. Otologic surgeons are now venturing to study stress, the brain function response, and consciousness. I never thought, as an otologist and ear researcher, that I would be getting involved in areas that border on behavioral neurology and the neuropsychological, said Abraham Shulman, MD, Director of the Martha Entenmann Tinnitus Research Center in Brooklyn, NY, who, with his group, including audiologist Barbara Goldstein, PhD, coined the term tinnitology. But that is where the study of tinnitus has led us.

Operative Theories: Changes

There are presently several competing theories on the origins of tinnitus, all pertaining to changes in the auditory system. The nature of those accompanying changes, however, is the subject of these operative theories.

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 | Single Page

Filed Under: Otology/Neurotology, Practice Focus Tagged With: medication, Otology, research, tinnitus, treatmentIssue: December 2008

You Might Also Like:

  • Tinnitus Research Implicates Brain Structures in Hearing Disorder
  • Electrical Stimulation to Treat Tinnitus
  • Congress Mandates Better Reporting of Tinnitus Among United States Military
  • NIH Launches Clinical Study for Tinnitus Treatment

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

The Triological SocietyENTtoday is a publication of The Triological Society.

Polls

Would you choose a concierge physician as your PCP?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...
  • Polls Archive

Top Articles for Residents

  • Applications Open for Resident Members of ENTtoday Edit Board
  • How To Provide Helpful Feedback To Residents
  • Call for Resident Bowl Questions
  • New Standardized Otolaryngology Curriculum Launching July 1 Should Be Valuable Resource For Physicians Around The World
  • Do Training Programs Give Otolaryngology Residents the Necessary Tools to Do Productive Research?
  • Popular this Week
  • Most Popular
  • Most Recent
    • A Journey Through Pay Inequity: A Physician’s Firsthand Account

    • The Dramatic Rise in Tongue Tie and Lip Tie Treatment

    • Otolaryngologists Are Still Debating the Effectiveness of Tongue Tie Treatment

    • Is Middle Ear Pressure Affected by Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Use?

    • Rating Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Severity: How Do Two Common Instruments Compare?

    • The Dramatic Rise in Tongue Tie and Lip Tie Treatment

    • Rating Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Severity: How Do Two Common Instruments Compare?

    • Is Middle Ear Pressure Affected by Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Use?

    • Otolaryngologists Are Still Debating the Effectiveness of Tongue Tie Treatment

    • Complications for When Physicians Change a Maiden Name

    • Excitement Around Gene Therapy for Hearing Restoration
    • “Small” Acts of Kindness
    • How To: Endoscopic Total Maxillectomy Without Facial Skin Incision
    • Science Communities Must Speak Out When Policies Threaten Health and Safety
    • Observation Most Cost-Effective in Addressing AECRS in Absence of Bacterial Infection

Follow Us

  • Contact Us
  • About Us
  • Advertise
  • The Triological Society
  • The Laryngoscope
  • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • Cookies

Wiley

Copyright © 2025 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies. ISSN 1559-4939