• Home
  • Practice Focus
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
    • How I Do It
    • TRIO Best Practices
  • Business of Medicine
    • Health Policy
    • Legal Matters
    • Practice Management
    • Tech Talk
    • AI
  • Literature Reviews
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
  • Career
    • Medical Education
    • Professional Development
    • Resident Focus
  • ENT Perspectives
    • ENT Expressions
    • Everyday Ethics
    • From TRIO
    • The Great Debate
    • Letter From the Editor
    • Rx: Wellness
    • The Voice
    • Viewpoint
  • TRIO Resources
    • Triological Society
    • The Laryngoscope
    • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
    • TRIO Combined Sections Meetings
    • COSM
    • Related Otolaryngology Events
  • Search

The Opt-Outs: Otolaryngologists extol the benefits of third-party independence

by RIchard Quinn • September 3, 2010

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
Print-Friendly Version

R. Anders Rosendahl, MD, a thyroid surgeon in Austin, Texas, understands that many physicians may be afraid to move away from the traditional model for fear that they might not be able to draw enough patients. He countered that although physicians who provide a high quality of care may build a practice more slowly in the first year or so, they will build a base of clients who are looking at quality, rather than professional fees.

You Might Also Like

  • AMA’s Opt-Out Provision for Sale of Physician Prescribing Data Seen as First Step
  • Getting out of the Insurance Game
  • Situation Critical: Otolaryngologists See Diminishing Returns for Taking Emergency Call
  • When Dealing with Insurers, Electronic Payment Tools May be an Otolaryngologist’s Best Friend
Explore This Issue
September 2010

“There is a large market for doctors who provide a very high level of care for patients,” Dr. Asher said. He believes his model is more cost effective in the long run. “I order less expensive, invasive tests and procedures than I used to when I worked in more conventional large group and academic settings, and my patients get excellent results with less medications, surgery and side effects,” he said.

As for hospitals shying away from using “opted-out” surgeons, Dr. Rosendahl performs nearly all of his surgeries at three Austin-area hospitals at which he is on staff.

“Who says you have to be traditional?” he said. “Why don’t we do what works?”

Dr. Rosendahl switched to a third-party-free practice in February 2003 when he relocated from Houston to Austin. He said his practice usually draws one of two responses from competing or referring physicians. The first is a curious envy, with physicians eager to learn more about how the operation works for him—and could work for them. The other reaction is, admittedly, more cynical, one Dr. Rosendahl described as “a twinge of jealousy that they have not yet made the big decision yet.”

Still, those doctors will often refer patients to him. “The beauty of my practice is how simple it is,” Dr. Rosendahl said. “Nobody comes to my office because of the book that some insurance company gives them. People come to my office because somebody told them it’s a good idea.”

Is ‘Opting Out’ Right for You?

Is ‘Opting Out’ Right for You?

Most physicians who have gone the “opt-out” route say revenue can be down in the early years, as the practice builds its census and reputation. Things to keep in mind, according to doctors and the Association for American Physicians and Surgeons:

  • Determine how much time your office staff spends on issues related purely to third-party payment. Include telephone calls with carriers, correspondence and study of carrier manuals. Tabulate the data to do a cost-efficiency review.
  • The switch can be jarring for some patients. Educate current and potential new patients. Explain how the practice will work on a cash basis, and note that opting out of Medicare is a choice, not a sign that the government does not approve of the practice.
  • Determine a scope of practice. What services will you offer? Where will they be offered? Can everything be done at one site? Do you need to be affiliated with a hospital?
  • Craft a business plan. With your review of time spent on third-party issues in hand, calculate how many patients the practice needs to see to generate the revenue threshold deemed acceptable.
  • Visit aapsonline.org. The site has one of the most comprehensive resource lists on opting out. It also contains a list of physicians across different specialties who have already made the transition.

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 | Single Page

Filed Under: Departments, Health Policy, Practice Management Tagged With: billing and coding, healthcare reform, insurance, legal, malpractice, Medicare, opt-out, practice management, reimbursement, third-partyIssue: September 2010

You Might Also Like:

  • AMA’s Opt-Out Provision for Sale of Physician Prescribing Data Seen as First Step
  • Getting out of the Insurance Game
  • Situation Critical: Otolaryngologists See Diminishing Returns for Taking Emergency Call
  • When Dealing with Insurers, Electronic Payment Tools May be an Otolaryngologist’s Best Friend

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

The Triological SocietyENTtoday is a publication of The Triological Society.

Polls

Would you choose a concierge physician as your PCP?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...
  • Polls Archive

Top Articles for Residents

  • Applications Open for Resident Members of ENTtoday Edit Board
  • How To Provide Helpful Feedback To Residents
  • Call for Resident Bowl Questions
  • New Standardized Otolaryngology Curriculum Launching July 1 Should Be Valuable Resource For Physicians Around The World
  • Do Training Programs Give Otolaryngology Residents the Necessary Tools to Do Productive Research?
  • Popular this Week
  • Most Popular
  • Most Recent
    • A Journey Through Pay Inequity: A Physician’s Firsthand Account

    • The Dramatic Rise in Tongue Tie and Lip Tie Treatment

    • Otolaryngologists Are Still Debating the Effectiveness of Tongue Tie Treatment

    • Is Middle Ear Pressure Affected by Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Use?

    • Rating Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Severity: How Do Two Common Instruments Compare?

    • The Dramatic Rise in Tongue Tie and Lip Tie Treatment

    • Rating Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Severity: How Do Two Common Instruments Compare?

    • Is Middle Ear Pressure Affected by Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Use?

    • Otolaryngologists Are Still Debating the Effectiveness of Tongue Tie Treatment

    • Complications for When Physicians Change a Maiden Name

    • Excitement Around Gene Therapy for Hearing Restoration
    • “Small” Acts of Kindness
    • How To: Endoscopic Total Maxillectomy Without Facial Skin Incision
    • Science Communities Must Speak Out When Policies Threaten Health and Safety
    • Observation Most Cost-Effective in Addressing AECRS in Absence of Bacterial Infection

Follow Us

  • Contact Us
  • About Us
  • Advertise
  • The Triological Society
  • The Laryngoscope
  • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • Cookies

Wiley

Copyright © 2025 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies. ISSN 1559-4939