• Home
  • Practice Focus
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
    • How I Do It
    • TRIO Best Practices
  • Business of Medicine
    • Health Policy
    • Legal Matters
    • Practice Management
    • Tech Talk
    • AI
  • Literature Reviews
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
  • Career
    • Medical Education
    • Professional Development
    • Resident Focus
  • ENT Perspectives
    • ENT Expressions
    • Everyday Ethics
    • From TRIO
    • The Great Debate
    • Letter From the Editor
    • Rx: Wellness
    • The Voice
    • Viewpoint
  • TRIO Resources
    • Triological Society
    • The Laryngoscope
    • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
    • TRIO Combined Sections Meetings
    • COSM
    • Related Otolaryngology Events
  • Search

Tips for Coding Inferior Turbinate Surgery

by David Bronstein • November 1, 2013

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
Print-Friendly Version

You Might Also Like

  • Otolaryngologists Increasingly Move Inferior Turbinate Surgery into the Office
  • The ABCs of CPT Coding
  • What Is the Best Method for Inferior Turbinate Hypertrophy Surgery?
  • Which Inferior Turbinate Reduction Technique Best Decreases Nasal Obstruction?
Explore This Issue
November 2013

When performing office-based surgery to correct inferior turbinate hypertrophy (ITH), success doesn’t just depend on clinical outcomes. Getting adequately reimbursed for these procedures to maintain a financially stable practice is also key, and the way to accomplish that is to brush up on your knowledge of Current Procedural Terminology (CPT) codes. So here are a few tips for ensuring proper coding of procedures and maximizing reimbursement.

1 Match the correct procedure with the correct CPT code. “In concept, at least, this is very simple: If you don’t assign the right CPT code to the right procedure, your payment claim is going to be denied,” said Dr. Setzen. “But the devil is in the details.” He noted, for example, that “if you remove the soft tissue of the turbinate via the submucosal approach, use CPT code 30140, no matter what method you use,” he said. “You can use a microdebrider, or you can simply resect tissue with any instrumentation, provided this is done submucosally.”

Becker’s ASC Review, an online source on business issues affecting physicians, notes that when the submucosal approach is not used, a different CPT code is required. For example, when radiofrequency (RF) coblation alone is used to reduce the inferior turbinates, code 30802—“cautery and/or ablation, mucosa of inferior turbinates, unilateral or bilateral, any method; intramural,” in CPT terminology—should be assigned and submitted for reimbursement.

Dr. Setzen agreed that this is his coding approach. “If you’re only going to do soft tissue shrinkage via RF coblation, I use 30801 or in some cases 30802,” he said.

2 Don’t confuse inferior with middle turbinate surgery. 
“Turbinate surgery codes 30130, 30140 and 30930 are specific to the inferior turbinates and should not be coded for procedures performed on the middle turbinates,” Becker’s ASC Review notes. In cases where resection and some type of fracture of the middle turbinates are done, surgeons should code 30999.

3 Don’t let coding dictate surgical choice. Dr. Setzen noted that codes 30801 and 30802 are reimbursed at a lower level than 30140, reflecting the less extensive nature of procedures that involve only soft tissue shrinkage. “But, remember, the reimbursement level should never drive physician choice in what procedure to perform, and neither should the technology,” he stressed. “You should base the procedure on your expertise, the needs of the patient and the best level of evidence.”

4 Avoid turbinate tunnel vision. The same endoscopic and video-documenting equipment used in ITH surgery can be employed in a wide variety of functional endoscopic sinus surgery (FESS) procedures. Therefore, it’s important to focus on proper coding in all of those cases. Becker’s ASC Review contains numerous tips for accurate FESS coding. According to the website, one of the most basic FESS coding requirements is probably the most obvious, yet it is often overlooked—the need to use the codes only when an endoscope is actually used. As obvious as that sounds, the site notes that many audited practices have been penalized when it was determined that FESS codes were submitted even though the sinus surgery was done using Caldwell-Luc antrostomies or frontal sinusotomies and not by endoscopy. “There are separate codes for non-endoscopic access to all sinuses (see the 310XX and 312XX series),” the website states.

Pages: 1 2 | Single Page

Filed Under: Departments, Practice Focus, Rhinology, Special Reports Tagged With: Coding, inferior turbinate hypertrophy, Inferior Turbinate Surgery, otolaryngologist, reimbursementIssue: November 2013

You Might Also Like:

  • Otolaryngologists Increasingly Move Inferior Turbinate Surgery into the Office
  • The ABCs of CPT Coding
  • What Is the Best Method for Inferior Turbinate Hypertrophy Surgery?
  • Which Inferior Turbinate Reduction Technique Best Decreases Nasal Obstruction?

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

The Triological SocietyENTtoday is a publication of The Triological Society.

Polls

Would you choose a concierge physician as your PCP?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...
  • Polls Archive

Top Articles for Residents

  • Applications Open for Resident Members of ENTtoday Edit Board
  • How To Provide Helpful Feedback To Residents
  • Call for Resident Bowl Questions
  • New Standardized Otolaryngology Curriculum Launching July 1 Should Be Valuable Resource For Physicians Around The World
  • Do Training Programs Give Otolaryngology Residents the Necessary Tools to Do Productive Research?
  • Popular this Week
  • Most Popular
  • Most Recent
    • A Journey Through Pay Inequity: A Physician’s Firsthand Account

    • The Dramatic Rise in Tongue Tie and Lip Tie Treatment

    • Rating Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Severity: How Do Two Common Instruments Compare?

    • Otolaryngologists Are Still Debating the Effectiveness of Tongue Tie Treatment

    • Is Middle Ear Pressure Affected by Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Use?

    • The Dramatic Rise in Tongue Tie and Lip Tie Treatment

    • Rating Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Severity: How Do Two Common Instruments Compare?

    • Is Middle Ear Pressure Affected by Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Use?

    • Otolaryngologists Are Still Debating the Effectiveness of Tongue Tie Treatment

    • Complications for When Physicians Change a Maiden Name

    • Excitement Around Gene Therapy for Hearing Restoration
    • “Small” Acts of Kindness
    • How To: Endoscopic Total Maxillectomy Without Facial Skin Incision
    • Science Communities Must Speak Out When Policies Threaten Health and Safety
    • Observation Most Cost-Effective in Addressing AECRS in Absence of Bacterial Infection

Follow Us

  • Contact Us
  • About Us
  • Advertise
  • The Triological Society
  • The Laryngoscope
  • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • Cookies

Wiley

Copyright © 2025 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies. ISSN 1559-4939