ENTtoday
  • Home
  • COVID-19
  • Practice Focus
    • Allergy
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
  • Departments
    • Issue Archive
    • TRIO Best Practices
      • Allergy
      • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
      • Head and Neck
      • Laryngology
      • Otology/Neurotology
      • Pediatric
      • Rhinology
      • Sleep Medicine
    • Career Development
    • Case of the Month
    • Everyday Ethics
    • Health Policy
    • Legal Matters
    • Letter From the Editor
    • Medical Education
    • Online Exclusives
    • Practice Management
    • Resident Focus
    • Rx: Wellness
    • Special Reports
    • Tech Talk
    • Viewpoint
    • What’s Your O.R. Playlist?
  • Literature Reviews
    • Allergy
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
  • Events
    • Featured Events
    • TRIO Meetings
  • Contact Us
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Triological Society
    • Advertising Staff
    • Subscribe
  • Advertise
    • Place an Ad
    • Classifieds
    • Rate Card
  • Search

Tips for Coding Inferior Turbinate Surgery

by David Bronstein • November 1, 2013

  • Tweet
  • Email
Print-Friendly Version

You Might Also Like

  • Otolaryngologists Increasingly Move Inferior Turbinate Surgery into the Office
  • The ABCs of CPT Coding
  • What Is the Best Method for Inferior Turbinate Hypertrophy Surgery?
  • Which Inferior Turbinate Reduction Technique Best Decreases Nasal Obstruction?
Explore This Issue
November 2013

When performing office-based surgery to correct inferior turbinate hypertrophy (ITH), success doesn’t just depend on clinical outcomes. Getting adequately reimbursed for these procedures to maintain a financially stable practice is also key, and the way to accomplish that is to brush up on your knowledge of Current Procedural Terminology (CPT) codes. So here are a few tips for ensuring proper coding of procedures and maximizing reimbursement.

1 Match the correct procedure with the correct CPT code. “In concept, at least, this is very simple: If you don’t assign the right CPT code to the right procedure, your payment claim is going to be denied,” said Dr. Setzen. “But the devil is in the details.” He noted, for example, that “if you remove the soft tissue of the turbinate via the submucosal approach, use CPT code 30140, no matter what method you use,” he said. “You can use a microdebrider, or you can simply resect tissue with any instrumentation, provided this is done submucosally.”

Becker’s ASC Review, an online source on business issues affecting physicians, notes that when the submucosal approach is not used, a different CPT code is required. For example, when radiofrequency (RF) coblation alone is used to reduce the inferior turbinates, code 30802—“cautery and/or ablation, mucosa of inferior turbinates, unilateral or bilateral, any method; intramural,” in CPT terminology—should be assigned and submitted for reimbursement.

Dr. Setzen agreed that this is his coding approach. “If you’re only going to do soft tissue shrinkage via RF coblation, I use 30801 or in some cases 30802,” he said.

2 Don’t confuse inferior with middle turbinate surgery. 
“Turbinate surgery codes 30130, 30140 and 30930 are specific to the inferior turbinates and should not be coded for procedures performed on the middle turbinates,” Becker’s ASC Review notes. In cases where resection and some type of fracture of the middle turbinates are done, surgeons should code 30999.

3 Don’t let coding dictate surgical choice. Dr. Setzen noted that codes 30801 and 30802 are reimbursed at a lower level than 30140, reflecting the less extensive nature of procedures that involve only soft tissue shrinkage. “But, remember, the reimbursement level should never drive physician choice in what procedure to perform, and neither should the technology,” he stressed. “You should base the procedure on your expertise, the needs of the patient and the best level of evidence.”

4 Avoid turbinate tunnel vision. The same endoscopic and video-documenting equipment used in ITH surgery can be employed in a wide variety of functional endoscopic sinus surgery (FESS) procedures. Therefore, it’s important to focus on proper coding in all of those cases. Becker’s ASC Review contains numerous tips for accurate FESS coding. According to the website, one of the most basic FESS coding requirements is probably the most obvious, yet it is often overlooked—the need to use the codes only when an endoscope is actually used. As obvious as that sounds, the site notes that many audited practices have been penalized when it was determined that FESS codes were submitted even though the sinus surgery was done using Caldwell-Luc antrostomies or frontal sinusotomies and not by endoscopy. “There are separate codes for non-endoscopic access to all sinuses (see the 310XX and 312XX series),” the website states.

Pages: 1 2 | Single Page

Filed Under: Departments, Practice Focus, Rhinology, Special Reports Tagged With: Coding, inferior turbinate hypertrophy, Inferior Turbinate Surgery, otolaryngologist, reimbursementIssue: November 2013

You Might Also Like:

  • Otolaryngologists Increasingly Move Inferior Turbinate Surgery into the Office
  • The ABCs of CPT Coding
  • What Is the Best Method for Inferior Turbinate Hypertrophy Surgery?
  • Which Inferior Turbinate Reduction Technique Best Decreases Nasal Obstruction?

The Triological SocietyENTtoday is a publication of The Triological Society.

The Laryngoscope
Ensure you have all the latest research at your fingertips; Subscribe to The Laryngoscope today!

Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
Open access journal in otolaryngology – head and neck surgery is currently accepting submissions.

Classifieds

View the classified ads »

TRIO Best Practices

View the TRIO Best Practices »

Top Articles for Residents

  • Do Training Programs Give Otolaryngology Residents the Necessary Tools to Do Productive Research?
  • Why More MDs, Medical Residents Are Choosing to Pursue Additional Academic Degrees
  • What Physicians Need to Know about Investing Before Hiring a Financial Advisor
  • Tips to Help You Regain Your Sense of Self
  • Should USMLE Step 1 Change from Numeric Score to Pass/Fail?
  • Popular this Week
  • Most Popular
  • Most Recent
    • The Dramatic Rise in Tongue Tie and Lip Tie Treatment
    • Vertigo in the Elderly: What Does It Mean?
    • Experts Delve into Treatment Options for Laryngopharyngeal Reflux
    • Weaning Patients Off of PPIs
    • Some Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Resists PPI Treatment
    • Vertigo in the Elderly: What Does It Mean?
    • New Developments in the Management of Eustachian Tube Dysfunction
    • Some Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Resists PPI Treatment
    • Eustachian Tuboplasty: A Potential New Option for Chronic Tube Dysfunction and Patulous Disease
    • The Dramatic Rise in Tongue Tie and Lip Tie Treatment
    • Did You Receive COVID-19 Relief? Here Are Reporting Considerations for 2021
    • Otolaryngology Experts Share Best Practices in Five Areas
    • How Climate Change May Be Affecting Sleep Patterns for Adults and Children
    • Laryngologists Discuss Tough Tracheostomy Choices During COVID-19 Era
    • Head and Neck Cancer: Experts Discuss How to Improve Surgery Quality and Value

Polls

Did you receive funding from the CARES Act or Paycheck Protection Program?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...
  • Polls Archive
  • Home
  • Contact Us
  • Advertise
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use

Visit: The Triological Society • The Laryngoscope • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology

Wiley
© 2021 The Triological Society. All Rights Reserved.
ISSN 1559-4939

loading Cancel
Post was not sent - check your email addresses!
Email check failed, please try again
Sorry, your blog cannot share posts by email.
This site uses cookies: Find out more.