• Home
  • Practice Focus
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
    • How I Do It
    • TRIO Best Practices
  • Business of Medicine
    • Health Policy
    • Legal Matters
    • Practice Management
    • Tech Talk
    • AI
  • Literature Reviews
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
  • Career
    • Medical Education
    • Professional Development
    • Resident Focus
  • ENT Perspectives
    • ENT Expressions
    • Everyday Ethics
    • From TRIO
    • The Great Debate
    • Letter From the Editor
    • Rx: Wellness
    • The Voice
    • Viewpoint
  • TRIO Resources
    • Triological Society
    • The Laryngoscope
    • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
    • TRIO Combined Sections Meetings
    • COSM
    • Related Otolaryngology Events
  • Search

The ABCs of CPT Coding

by Jane Jerrard • August 1, 2006

  • Tweet
  • Email
Print-Friendly Version

CHICAGO-Important aspects of coding and reimbursement for otolaryngologists-head and neck surgeons-including some controversial coding issues-were covered in the American Rhinologic Society (ARS)’s Patient Advocacy Panel here at the 2006 Combined Otolaryngology Spring Meetings (COSM). The panel was moderated by Michael Setzen, MD, Clinical Associate Professor of Otolaryngology at New York University School of Medicine, Chief of the Rhinology Section at North Shore University Hospital at Manhasset (NY), and Chair of the ARS Patient Advocacy Committee. Dr. Setzen introduced the subject by saying, To receive appropriate reimbursement, one must document, show medical necessity, and use proper coding.

You Might Also Like

  • Coding: It’s All in the Details
  • Tips for Coding Inferior Turbinate Surgery
  • 2013 CPT Code Changes May Impact Your Practice
  • Coding and Documenting Advice from the Experts
Explore This Issue
August 2006

Dr. Setzen and two other speakers covered several important coding topics, and here are some highlights from their presentation.

Image Guidance System

The Current Procedural Terminology (CPT) code 61795 is used to reimburse for image guidance systems (IGS), including intracranial, extracranial, or spinal.

Clearly document when and why you used IGS, Dr. Setzen advised. Be specific about when you used it during surgery, and note it in detail in your operation report. If you get denied, send a copy of that report.

Dr. Setzen recommended adhering to the American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery (AAO-HNS) guidelines for IGS, because the organization’s policy statement will support your actions. He added that AAO-HNS helped legitimize the use of IGS a year ago. The Academy presented four or five major changes in September 2005 to help us get better reimbursed, he said. These changes include the following statements in the guidelines:

  1. IGS is not experimental or investigational.
  2. There is sufficient expert consensus opinion and literature evidence to support its use.
  3. It is impossible to corroborate this with level one evidence.
  4. This technology is used at the discretion of the operating surgeon.
  5. The intraoperative use of computer-aided surgery in appropriate select cases is endorsed to assist the surgeon in clarifying complex anatomy during sinus and skull base surgery.

When you are denied, this last statement is very helpful, said Dr. Setzen.

Endoscopic Sinus Debridement

The CPT code 31237 applies to debridement. FESS [functional endoscopic sinus surgery] has zero global days, thus you may begin to report endoscopic debridements the next day, said Dr. Setzen. Just be sure that you document this procedure similar to an operative report in your chart note! He added that you should report unilateral or bilateral codes as appropriate.

Don’t use this if you’re going to ‘clean out the nose’, advised Dr. Setzen. It must be a formal debridement to use this code. And if you’re telling the carrier that you’re using debridement over and above FESS, add on -79 to the 31237 code. Example: You may report debridements following septoplasty or turbinate surgery for FESS, as the debridement is performed for an unrelated diagnosis-use Modifier 79 (31237-79).

Pages: 1 2 3 | Single Page

Filed Under: Departments, Health Policy, Practice Focus, Practice Management, Rhinology Tagged With: billing and coding, COSM, functional endoscopic sinus surgery, guidelines, healthcare reform, Imaging, insurance, Medicare, policy, reimbursement, sinuplasty, surgeryIssue: August 2006

You Might Also Like:

  • Coding: It’s All in the Details
  • Tips for Coding Inferior Turbinate Surgery
  • 2013 CPT Code Changes May Impact Your Practice
  • Coding and Documenting Advice from the Experts

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

The Triological SocietyENTtoday is a publication of The Triological Society.

Polls

Have you invented or patented something that betters the field of otolaryngology?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...
  • Polls Archive

Top Articles for Residents

  • Applications Open for Resident Members of ENTtoday Edit Board
  • How To Provide Helpful Feedback To Residents
  • Call for Resident Bowl Questions
  • New Standardized Otolaryngology Curriculum Launching July 1 Should Be Valuable Resource For Physicians Around The World
  • Do Training Programs Give Otolaryngology Residents the Necessary Tools to Do Productive Research?
  • Popular this Week
  • Most Popular
  • Most Recent
    • The Dramatic Rise in Tongue Tie and Lip Tie Treatment

    • Otolaryngologists Are Still Debating the Effectiveness of Tongue Tie Treatment

    • The Road Less Traveled—at Least by Otolaryngologists

    • The Best Site for Pediatric TT Placement: OR or Office?

    • Rating Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Severity: How Do Two Common Instruments Compare?

    • The Dramatic Rise in Tongue Tie and Lip Tie Treatment

    • Rating Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Severity: How Do Two Common Instruments Compare?

    • Is Middle Ear Pressure Affected by Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Use?

    • Otolaryngologists Are Still Debating the Effectiveness of Tongue Tie Treatment

    • Complications for When Physicians Change a Maiden Name

    • Leaky Pipes—Time to Focus on Our Foundations
    • You Are Among Friends: The Value Of Being In A Group
    • How To: Full Endoscopic Procedures of Total Parotidectomy
    • How To: Does Intralesional Steroid Injection Effectively Mitigate Vocal Fold Scarring in a Rabbit Model?
    • What Is the Optimal Anticoagulation in HGNS Surgery in Patients with High-Risk Cardiac Comorbidities?

Follow Us

  • Contact Us
  • About Us
  • Advertise
  • The Triological Society
  • The Laryngoscope
  • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • Cookies

Wiley

Copyright © 2025 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies. ISSN 1559-4939