• Home
  • Practice Focus
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
    • How I Do It
    • TRIO Best Practices
  • Business of Medicine
    • Health Policy
    • Legal Matters
    • Practice Management
    • Tech Talk
    • AI
  • Literature Reviews
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
  • Career
    • Medical Education
    • Professional Development
    • Resident Focus
  • ENT Perspectives
    • ENT Expressions
    • Everyday Ethics
    • From TRIO
    • The Great Debate
    • Letter From the Editor
    • Rx: Wellness
    • The Voice
    • Viewpoint
  • TRIO Resources
    • Triological Society
    • The Laryngoscope
    • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
    • TRIO Combined Sections Meetings
    • COSM
    • Related Otolaryngology Events
  • Search

Tips for Creating a Dynamic Otolaryngology Workforce

by Andrew J. Tompkins, MD, MBA • July 13, 2022

  • Tweet
  • Email
Print-Friendly Version

One of the uncomfortable truths of medicine is that we compete against one another. We have a shared history, having gone through the crucible of training together—in some cases even in the same program, at the same time. Many of us are friends. Some of the things that attracted me to our specialty and that I continue to be enamored by are the intellect and kindness of our members.

You Might Also Like

  • Transparent, Regular Data Vital to Reworking How We Think About Workforce Supply
  • Rethinking the Otolaryngology Workforce
  • Tips on Creating a Website for Your Practice
  • Fill the Gap: Strategies for addressing the otolaryngology workforce shortage
Explore This Issue
July 2022

But we must also grapple with the fact that as high-minded, compassionate, and friendly as we are, we still compete with one another. And our organizations’ growth aspirations and our shared marketplace’s competitive dynamics have real implications for the complexion of our workforce.

Andrew J. Tompkins, MD, MBATransparent outcome data, with appropriate controls, that patients care about should replace the current quality mandates put out by CMS. These transparency changes allow for more efficient allocation of capital—patients will choose to go where they perceive the value is, and workforce changes will follow. —Andrew J. Tompkins, MD, MBA

One of the most basic structural elements of our workforce is our practice environment (hospital, private practice, academic center, etc.). Where job seekers go will largely depend on work availability in these environments, which, of course, will vary geographically and over time. Even group size is changing over time, with unique otolaryngology practices on the decline and a trend toward larger practice size (Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2022;6:1–6). Whether from competitive dynamics, practice expenses, or real-term decline in physician fee schedule payments, job creation through solo practice is waning. Therefore, job opportunities are increasingly set through the labor demand in these larger practice environments, which are based on things like referral volume, subspecialty need, and advanced practice provider (APP) integration. Of these items, referral volume is paramount for creating job opportunities. The upshot is that if referrals aren’t growing in a given practice environment, the preferences of a job seeker matter little—they have to take what’s available.

Medical Market Details

Before exploring competition for patient visits, we should take a step back and examine what competition looks like in a normal workplace market. In a normal market, competition occurs based on consumer value. Firms jockey to provide different products to different market segments at different costs. Better quality and/or lower cost usually wins, and the consumer wins. Transparency of quality and cost is vital to optimizing consumer value.

Unfortunately, we don’t operate in such a market. We operate based on referral control with hidden quality and cost. Worse yet, we have disparate payments for the same service based on service location, with asymmetric inflation figures applied annually by our government. In 2020, for example, Medicare paid the average hospital 2.3 times more money for a level 3 follow-up visit than they did an average private practice (American Medical Association Current Procedural Terminology code 99213, HCP Code Set G0463, CMS.gov 2020 payment files). Keep in mind, patients also pay that higher cost sharing for arguably the same service, and they have no idea how much they’re paying in advance. Normal markets don’t operate like this.

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 | Single Page

Filed Under: Departments, Home Slider, Viewpoint Tagged With: career development, otolaryngologyIssue: July 2022

You Might Also Like:

  • Transparent, Regular Data Vital to Reworking How We Think About Workforce Supply
  • Rethinking the Otolaryngology Workforce
  • Tips on Creating a Website for Your Practice
  • Fill the Gap: Strategies for addressing the otolaryngology workforce shortage

The Triological SocietyENTtoday is a publication of The Triological Society.

Polls

Have you invented or patented something that betters the field of otolaryngology?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...
  • Polls Archive

Top Articles for Residents

  • Applications Open for Resident Members of ENTtoday Edit Board
  • How To Provide Helpful Feedback To Residents
  • Call for Resident Bowl Questions
  • New Standardized Otolaryngology Curriculum Launching July 1 Should Be Valuable Resource For Physicians Around The World
  • Do Training Programs Give Otolaryngology Residents the Necessary Tools to Do Productive Research?
  • Popular this Week
  • Most Popular
  • Most Recent
    • The Dramatic Rise in Tongue Tie and Lip Tie Treatment

    • Otolaryngologists Are Still Debating the Effectiveness of Tongue Tie Treatment

    • The Best Site for Pediatric TT Placement: OR or Office?

    • Rating Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Severity: How Do Two Common Instruments Compare?

    • Keeping Watch for Skin Cancers on the Head and Neck

    • The Dramatic Rise in Tongue Tie and Lip Tie Treatment

    • Rating Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Severity: How Do Two Common Instruments Compare?

    • Is Middle Ear Pressure Affected by Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Use?

    • Otolaryngologists Are Still Debating the Effectiveness of Tongue Tie Treatment

    • Complications for When Physicians Change a Maiden Name

    • Leaky Pipes—Time to Focus on Our Foundations
    • You Are Among Friends: The Value Of Being In A Group
    • How To: Full Endoscopic Procedures of Total Parotidectomy
    • How To: Does Intralesional Steroid Injection Effectively Mitigate Vocal Fold Scarring in a Rabbit Model?
    • What Is the Optimal Anticoagulation in HGNS Surgery in Patients with High-Risk Cardiac Comorbidities?

Follow Us

  • Contact Us
  • About Us
  • Advertise
  • The Triological Society
  • The Laryngoscope
  • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • Cookies

Wiley

Copyright © 2025 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies. ISSN 1559-4939