• Home
  • Practice Focus
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
    • How I Do It
    • TRIO Best Practices
  • Business of Medicine
    • Health Policy
    • Legal Matters
    • Practice Management
    • Tech Talk
    • AI
  • Literature Reviews
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
  • Career
    • Medical Education
    • Professional Development
    • Resident Focus
  • ENT Perspectives
    • ENT Expressions
    • Everyday Ethics
    • From TRIO
    • The Great Debate
    • Letter From the Editor
    • Rx: Wellness
    • The Voice
    • Viewpoint
  • TRIO Resources
    • Triological Society
    • The Laryngoscope
    • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
    • TRIO Combined Sections Meetings
    • COSM
    • Related Otolaryngology Events
  • Search

Treatment Termination Criteria for Necrotizing (Malignant) Otitis Externa

by Andy M. Courson, MD, Holenarasipur R. Vikram, MD, and David M. Barrs, MD • July 1, 2014

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
Print-Friendly Version

Trio Best PracticeBackground

The diagnosis of necrotizing, or “malignant,” otitis externa (NOE) is typically made by the clinical picture of a severe otitis externa, often in a diabetic or immunocompromised patient, with associated skull base soft tissue infection and osteomyelitis, as visualized on magnetic resonance (MR) or computed tomographic (CT) scanning. While treatment efficacy has improved since the condition was first described decades ago, NOE remains a severe infection with potential for significant morbidity and mortality. Bacterial NOE is ideally treated with at least six weeks of culture-directed systemic antibiotics, often with infectious disease consultation. Patients presenting with NOE frequently have been previously treated with oral or topical antibiotics, rendering cultures negative. In these cases, many clinicians empirically treat with antipseudomonal antibiotics. Longer therapy may be required with multidrug resistant strains of bacteria such as Pseudomonas aeruginosa, or with molds such as Aspergillus fumigatus. As NOE can mimic squamous cell carcinoma of the external ear canal on physical exam and CT scan, some clinicians biopsy granulation tissue when diagnosis is uncertain or if granulation tissue is present after six weeks of treatment. Once clinical exam and laboratory markers have normalized, the otolaryngologist faces the problem of how to determine if treatment has been adequate and can be discontinued with minimal risk of recurrence. As soft tissue involvement is expected to have resolved, the concern is for persistent osteomyelitis. Two questions are important: what is the appropriate duration of antibiotics and how can the clinician tell when the infection is resolved.

You Might Also Like

  • What Is the Best Test for Diagnosing and Monitoring Treatment Response in Malignant Otitis Externa?
  • Age Is Only Independent Risk Factor in Malignant Otitis Externa Patient Admission-Level Outcomes
  • What is the Role of Tympanostomy Tubes in the Treatment of Recurrent Acute Otitis Media?
  • Change of Course?: Studies point to antibiotics as optimal treatment for otitis media
Explore This Issue
July 2014

Best Practice

Based on recommendations for the treatment of osteomyelitis, bacterial NOE should be treated with at least six weeks of antibiotics. Even with clinical resolution, there may be concern for residual infection in a surgically inaccessible skull base area. Imaging studies can therefore be considered. MRI, CT, and Tc99 cannot be used to document resolution as bone changes persist after disease resolution. Ga67 scintigraphy or 111In-labeled leukocyte scintigraphy combined with SPECT/CT can help differentiate healing bone from active infection. If these are positive, antimicrobial therapy is continued, and the scans can be repeated at two to four week intervals until normalization. No current evidence exists for the efficacy of FDG PET in imaging NOE, but the otolaryngologist should consider consultation with radiologists specialized in nuclear medicine as imaging modalities may change rapidly. Recurrence has been reported to be around 15% to 20%, so at least a six month follow-up for NOE with a low threshold for reimaging is ideal. Future research directed at determining the sensitivity and specificity of the various radiologicmodalities in identifying resolution of disease could help unify recommendations for when to terminate therapy for NOE. Read the full article in the Laryngoscope.

Filed Under: Otology/Neurotology, Practice Focus, TRIO Best Practices Tagged With: Necrotizing otitis externaIssue: July 2014

You Might Also Like:

  • What Is the Best Test for Diagnosing and Monitoring Treatment Response in Malignant Otitis Externa?
  • Age Is Only Independent Risk Factor in Malignant Otitis Externa Patient Admission-Level Outcomes
  • What is the Role of Tympanostomy Tubes in the Treatment of Recurrent Acute Otitis Media?
  • Change of Course?: Studies point to antibiotics as optimal treatment for otitis media

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

The Triological SocietyENTtoday is a publication of The Triological Society.

Polls

Would you choose a concierge physician as your PCP?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...
  • Polls Archive

Top Articles for Residents

  • Applications Open for Resident Members of ENTtoday Edit Board
  • How To Provide Helpful Feedback To Residents
  • Call for Resident Bowl Questions
  • New Standardized Otolaryngology Curriculum Launching July 1 Should Be Valuable Resource For Physicians Around The World
  • Do Training Programs Give Otolaryngology Residents the Necessary Tools to Do Productive Research?
  • Popular this Week
  • Most Popular
  • Most Recent
    • A Journey Through Pay Inequity: A Physician’s Firsthand Account

    • The Dramatic Rise in Tongue Tie and Lip Tie Treatment

    • Otolaryngologists Are Still Debating the Effectiveness of Tongue Tie Treatment

    • Is Middle Ear Pressure Affected by Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Use?

    • Rating Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Severity: How Do Two Common Instruments Compare?

    • The Dramatic Rise in Tongue Tie and Lip Tie Treatment

    • Rating Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Severity: How Do Two Common Instruments Compare?

    • Is Middle Ear Pressure Affected by Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Use?

    • Otolaryngologists Are Still Debating the Effectiveness of Tongue Tie Treatment

    • Complications for When Physicians Change a Maiden Name

    • Excitement Around Gene Therapy for Hearing Restoration
    • “Small” Acts of Kindness
    • How To: Endoscopic Total Maxillectomy Without Facial Skin Incision
    • Science Communities Must Speak Out When Policies Threaten Health and Safety
    • Observation Most Cost-Effective in Addressing AECRS in Absence of Bacterial Infection

Follow Us

  • Contact Us
  • About Us
  • Advertise
  • The Triological Society
  • The Laryngoscope
  • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • Cookies

Wiley

Copyright © 2025 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies. ISSN 1559-4939