• Home
  • Practice Focus
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
    • How I Do It
    • TRIO Best Practices
  • Business of Medicine
    • Health Policy
    • Legal Matters
    • Practice Management
    • Tech Talk
    • AI
  • Literature Reviews
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
  • Career
    • Medical Education
    • Professional Development
    • Resident Focus
  • ENT Perspectives
    • ENT Expressions
    • Everyday Ethics
    • From TRIO
    • The Great Debate
    • Letter From the Editor
    • Rx: Wellness
    • The Voice
    • Viewpoint
  • TRIO Resources
    • Triological Society
    • The Laryngoscope
    • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
    • TRIO Combined Sections Meetings
    • COSM
    • Related Otolaryngology Events
  • Search

Unintended Consequences: Combat-related injuries lead to advances in facial plastic and reconstructive surgery

by Jennifer Decker Arevalo, MA • February 1, 2010

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
Print-Friendly Version

The expertise gained by deployed otolaryngologists in OIF and OEF who have seen a large volume of HFNIs, has led to a renewed interest in HFNI trauma care by civilian otolaryngologists. “In fact, there is an effort underway, led by the military otolaryngologists, to refocus on our specialty’s experience and expertise in this aspect of trauma care,” Dr. Holt said.

You Might Also Like

  • Facial Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery: New Patients, New Reasons, New Techniques
  • Wound Management Following Facial Plastic Surgery
  • Trends in Facial Plastic Surgery: New Patient Groups Bring New Challenges
  • The Revolution and Evolution of Free Flaps in Facial Reconstructive Surgery
Explore This Issue
February 2010

More importantly, “as we become better educated and experienced in working with these technological advances, our service men and women are achieving better outcomes and reaping the benefits,” Dr. Laughlin added. ENTtoday

Infection Control

Infections in battlefield wounds have been an ongoing risk factor for years. According to a 2008 study, a high frequency of combat-related maxillofacial infections (7.1 percent) in theater, compared to other parts of the body (3.9 percent), was first observed in the Vietnam War, even with rapid evacuation, antibiotics, and early wound care (J Trauma. 2008;64(3):S265-S276). During the Iraq-Iran conflict in the 1980s, an 11 percent infection rate for maxillofacial injuries has been noted; delay in evacuation and lack of suitable fixation devices are listed as contributing factors.

Of the 52 patients in Dr. Lopez’s study who underwent ORIF in theater during OIF in 2005, none developed Acinetobacter baumannii infection. A. baumannii is a bacterium found in Iraqi soil that causes wound and prostheses infections, catheter-related sepsis and osteomyelitis. Although complex infection problems, including multiresistant microorganisms like A. baumannii, can still occur today, “infections are extremely rare and localized, because of the head and neck’s robust vascular supply,” said Dr. Lopez.

Additionally, deployed otolaryngologists/head and neck surgeons now have years of experience in which they have learned how to combat these bugs at an earlier stage in theater. “We quickly learned that standard empiric antibiotics used to treat civilian casualties did not work as well with combat casualties due to the indigenous bacteria of the theater,” Dr. Laughlin said.

“Dr. Lopez’s article was a valuable case series report and supported the prevailing opinion that head and neck combat injuries treated in theater are not at higher risk for A. baumannii infections,” said Lt. Col. Robert Hale, DDS, director of Craniomaxillofacial Research at the U.S. Army Institute of Surgical Research.

Dr. Hale and his colleagues now encourage physicians to use high-dose cefazolin, clindamycin, or ceftriaxone immediately upon identification of an HNFI and continue coverage during surgical interventions in a military setting. However, coverage should not extend beyond 24 hours post-op because long term antibiotic use may contribute to multidrug-resistant infections, such as A. baumannii, that have been found in military hospitals. Wounded service men and women are now automatically cultured for A. baumannii and placed in isolation if the results are positive, even though HNFIs have a lower incidence of this particular infection due to high oxygen tension levels.

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 | Single Page

Filed Under: Departments, Facial Plastic/Reconstructive, Head and Neck, Medical Education, Practice Focus Tagged With: antibiotics, facial, head and neck, infection, reconstructive, research, surgery, warIssue: February 2010

You Might Also Like:

  • Facial Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery: New Patients, New Reasons, New Techniques
  • Wound Management Following Facial Plastic Surgery
  • Trends in Facial Plastic Surgery: New Patient Groups Bring New Challenges
  • The Revolution and Evolution of Free Flaps in Facial Reconstructive Surgery

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

The Triological SocietyENTtoday is a publication of The Triological Society.

Polls

Would you choose a concierge physician as your PCP?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...
  • Polls Archive

Top Articles for Residents

  • Applications Open for Resident Members of ENTtoday Edit Board
  • How To Provide Helpful Feedback To Residents
  • Call for Resident Bowl Questions
  • New Standardized Otolaryngology Curriculum Launching July 1 Should Be Valuable Resource For Physicians Around The World
  • Do Training Programs Give Otolaryngology Residents the Necessary Tools to Do Productive Research?
  • Popular this Week
  • Most Popular
  • Most Recent
    • A Journey Through Pay Inequity: A Physician’s Firsthand Account

    • The Dramatic Rise in Tongue Tie and Lip Tie Treatment

    • Otolaryngologists Are Still Debating the Effectiveness of Tongue Tie Treatment

    • Is Middle Ear Pressure Affected by Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Use?

    • Rating Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Severity: How Do Two Common Instruments Compare?

    • The Dramatic Rise in Tongue Tie and Lip Tie Treatment

    • Rating Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Severity: How Do Two Common Instruments Compare?

    • Is Middle Ear Pressure Affected by Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Use?

    • Otolaryngologists Are Still Debating the Effectiveness of Tongue Tie Treatment

    • Complications for When Physicians Change a Maiden Name

    • Excitement Around Gene Therapy for Hearing Restoration
    • “Small” Acts of Kindness
    • How To: Endoscopic Total Maxillectomy Without Facial Skin Incision
    • Science Communities Must Speak Out When Policies Threaten Health and Safety
    • Observation Most Cost-Effective in Addressing AECRS in Absence of Bacterial Infection

Follow Us

  • Contact Us
  • About Us
  • Advertise
  • The Triological Society
  • The Laryngoscope
  • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • Cookies

Wiley

Copyright © 2025 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies. ISSN 1559-4939