• Home
  • Practice Focus
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
    • How I Do It
    • TRIO Best Practices
  • Business of Medicine
    • Health Policy
    • Legal Matters
    • Practice Management
    • Technology
    • AI
  • Literature Reviews
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
  • Career
    • Medical Education
    • Professional Development
    • Resident Focus
  • ENT Perspectives
    • ENT Expressions
    • Everyday Ethics
    • From TRIO
    • The Great Debate
    • Letter From the Editor
    • Rx: Wellness
    • The Voice
    • Viewpoint
    • SUO Corner
  • TRIO Resources
    • Triological Society
    • The Laryngoscope
    • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
    • TRIO Combined Sections Meetings
    • COSM
    • Related Otolaryngology Events
  • Search

Otolaryngologists Vary Significantly in Choice of Injectable Materials for Vocal Fold Injection Augmentation

by Linda Kossoff • May 26, 2023

  • Tweet
  • Email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
Print-Friendly Version

What are the variations in provider preference and utilization of injectable materials for vocal fold injection (VFI) augmentation?

BOTTOM LINE

You Might Also Like

  • Trial Vocal Fold Injection Helps Predict Positive Outcomes
  • Vocal Fold Fat Augmentation Is a Durable Treatment Option for Patients with Glottic Insufficiency
  • When Should You Perform Injection Medialization for Pediatric Unilateral Vocal Fold Immobility?
  • Vocal Fold Augmentation Improves Dyspnea Symptoms for Glottic Insufficiency
Explore This Issue
May 2023

There are significant variations in preferences regarding VFI materials, although hyaluronic acid (HA)-based products are the most frequently used by providers.

BACKGROUND: VFI is an effective treatment for glottic insufficiency. Advances in injection material availability have helped expand VFI use, while rapid changes in available material options have increased the variability of provider preferences. The materials differ in their duration of effect, and decisions regarding their selection are not standardized.

STUDY DESIGN: Survey research.

SETTING: Department of Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, Calif.

SYNOPSIS: Researchers designed an electronic survey of 40 questions pertaining to the preferences and practices of American laryngologists in terms of vocal fold injectables. Of the 158 laryngologists contacted, 97 (61.4%) participated in the survey. Most respondents were fellowship trained (92.8%) and practiced in an academic setting (93.8%), with clinical experience in the field ranging from < five years to > 15 years. Responses showed that the most frequently used injectable materials were HA-based products, used for acute/ subacute vocal fold paralysis, presbyphonia, and sulcus/scar (54.2%, 61.5%, 44.7%, and 41.7%, respectively). However, 17.8% of participants discontinued HA-based products, largely due to adverse effects. Carboxymethycellulose- based products were preferred for trial augmentation (57.2%); 21.8% of participants discontinued these products due to quick material resorption. Calcium hydroxyapatite-based products were preferred for long-term paralysis; 26% of respondents abandoned these products, mostly due to inflammatory properties. More than 30% of respondents reported wanting to reinitiate micronized alloderm Cymetra as an available injectable. Brand choice seemed largely driven by situational factors like availability and cost. The study was limited by its recruiting metholodogy, survey response rate, and descriptive response nature.

CITATION: Kharidia KM, Bensoussan Y, Rosen CA, et al. Variations in practices and preferences of vocal fold injection materials: A national survey. Laryngoscope. 2023;133:1176–1183.

Filed Under: Laryngology, Laryngology, Literature Reviews, Practice Focus Tagged With: glottic insufficiency, patient surveys, vocal fold injectionIssue: May 2023

You Might Also Like:

  • Trial Vocal Fold Injection Helps Predict Positive Outcomes
  • Vocal Fold Fat Augmentation Is a Durable Treatment Option for Patients with Glottic Insufficiency
  • When Should You Perform Injection Medialization for Pediatric Unilateral Vocal Fold Immobility?
  • Vocal Fold Augmentation Improves Dyspnea Symptoms for Glottic Insufficiency

The Triological SocietyENTtoday is a publication of The Triological Society.

Polls

Have you ever participated in a professional group's advocacy or Hill Day event?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...
  • Polls Archive

Top Articles for Residents

  • Is the SLOR in Otolaryngology Residency Applications Contributing to Rural Disparities?
  • Applications Open for Resident Members of the ENTtoday Editorial Board: Deadline Extended
  • A Resident’s View of AI in Otolaryngology
  • Call for Resident Bowl Questions
  • Resident Pearls: Pediatric Otolaryngologists Share Tips for Safer, Smarter Tonsillectomies
  • Popular this Week
  • Most Popular
  • Most Recent
    • A Royal Family Heritage: The Habsburg Jaw
    • The Dramatic Rise in Tongue Tie and Lip Tie Treatment
    • What Does The Pitt Have Against Otolaryngologists?
    • Some Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Resists PPI Treatment
    • Rating Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Severity: How Do Two Common Instruments Compare?
    • The Dramatic Rise in Tongue Tie and Lip Tie Treatment
    • Rating Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Severity: How Do Two Common Instruments Compare?
    • Is Middle Ear Pressure Affected by Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Use?
    • Otolaryngologists Are Still Debating the Effectiveness of Tongue Tie Treatment
    • Complications for When Physicians Change a Maiden Name
    • Society Debuts TRIO Leadership Academy
    • Innovations in Otolaryngology: Two Paths to Progress
    • How to Have Effective Presurgical Discussions
    • Advocacy: Finding Our Voice
    • A Royal Family Heritage: The Habsburg Jaw

Follow Us

  • Contact Us
  • About Us
  • Advertise
  • The Triological Society
  • The Laryngoscope
  • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • Cookies

Wiley

Copyright © 2026 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies. ISSN 1559-4939