• Home
  • Practice Focus
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
    • How I Do It
    • TRIO Best Practices
  • Business of Medicine
    • Health Policy
    • Legal Matters
    • Practice Management
    • Tech Talk
    • AI
  • Literature Reviews
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
  • Career
    • Medical Education
    • Professional Development
    • Resident Focus
  • ENT Perspectives
    • ENT Expressions
    • Everyday Ethics
    • From TRIO
    • The Great Debate
    • Letter From the Editor
    • Rx: Wellness
    • The Voice
    • Viewpoint
  • TRIO Resources
    • Triological Society
    • The Laryngoscope
    • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
    • TRIO Combined Sections Meetings
    • COSM
    • Related Otolaryngology Events
  • Search

What You Need to Know About CMS Changes to the Physician Fee Schedule for 2021

by Sunil Verma, MD, MBA • April 20, 2021

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
Print-Friendly Version

As many of you are aware, CMS has made significant changes to the Physician Fee Schedule (PFS) for the 2021 calendar year. These modifications to the PFS are the most significant changes made since 1997 and will undoubtedly affect the way in which otolaryngologists practice, from documentation to reimbursement.

You Might Also Like

  • Letter from the Editor: How 2021 CMS Reimbursement Changes Will Affect Otolaryngology
  • Is the Fee-for-Service Physician Payment Model Doomed?
  • Time-Based Physician Services Require Proper Documentation
  • Supreme Court Finds CMS COVID19 Vaccine Mandate Permissible, Not OSHA
Explore This Issue
April 2021

The two largest areas of change in the PFS are those in ambulatory/outpatient evaluation and management (E/M) services and those in payment to providers.

Payment Changes

As a review, the CMS reimbursement payments are calculated as follows:

(Relative Value Unit) x (Geographic Practice Cost Index) x Conversion Factor = Payment

Each procedure’s relative value unit (RVU) is composed of three parts: work RVU (wRVU), practice expense RVU (PE RVU), and malpractice RVU (MP RVU). RVUs for each outpatient CPT code (99202-99205/99211-99215) increased substantially from calendar year 2020 to calendar year 2021. All components of the RVU, including wRVU, changed; the wRVU for 99203-99205 and 99213-99215 increased:

  • 99203 wRVU increased from 1.42 to 1.60
  • 99204 wRVU increased from 2.43 to 2.60
  • 99205 wRVU increased from 3.17 to 3.50

While, on the surface, an increase in RVU for E/M visits might seem favorable, budget neutrality requirements require that the increases in payment for these E/M visits be offset by reductions in payments for other services. This was achieved in two fashions. First, CMS did rebalance the RVU attribution for some services, which affected other subspecialties much more than otolaryngology.

The second, and more impactful, way that budget neutrality was achieved was the decrease in the Conversion Factor (CF) for the first time in many years, from $36.09 to $32.41. We have to look back over 25 years ago to 1994 to identify a comparable CF of $32.91, without any consideration of inflation.

The degree of history documented, including family, past surgical and medical history, and a review of systems, is no longer used for coding. As such, providers may document only a history that’s relevant to the medical encounter.

While, on the whole, these changes translate to an increase in payment for ambulatory/outpatient E/M services, it means procedures and other services in which RVUs did not meaningfully increase will be reimbursed at a significantly lower rate.

Many organizations have attempted to model what the changes in RVUs and payments will be, but this is difficult to project due to coding practices. Most agree, however, that otolaryngologists will receive an approximately 7% increase in wRVUs but a corresponding 3%-4% decrease in reimbursement for identical services rendered.   

Physicians paid on a $/RVU model can expect that organizations will propose decreasing the amount paid per RVU. Even for those with no or few Medicare patients, private payor contracts typically mirror CMS payment models, so changes throughout the year should be expected. Otolaryngologists who provide mostly ambulatory care with few procedural services may see increases in reimbursement or payments as a result of these changes. 

Pages: 1 2 3 | Single Page

Filed Under: Features, Home Slider Tagged With: patient care, practice managementIssue: April 2021

You Might Also Like:

  • Letter from the Editor: How 2021 CMS Reimbursement Changes Will Affect Otolaryngology
  • Is the Fee-for-Service Physician Payment Model Doomed?
  • Time-Based Physician Services Require Proper Documentation
  • Supreme Court Finds CMS COVID19 Vaccine Mandate Permissible, Not OSHA

The Triological SocietyENTtoday is a publication of The Triological Society.

Polls

Would you choose a concierge physician as your PCP?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...
  • Polls Archive

Top Articles for Residents

  • Applications Open for Resident Members of ENTtoday Edit Board
  • How To Provide Helpful Feedback To Residents
  • Call for Resident Bowl Questions
  • New Standardized Otolaryngology Curriculum Launching July 1 Should Be Valuable Resource For Physicians Around The World
  • Do Training Programs Give Otolaryngology Residents the Necessary Tools to Do Productive Research?
  • Popular this Week
  • Most Popular
  • Most Recent
    • A Journey Through Pay Inequity: A Physician’s Firsthand Account

    • The Dramatic Rise in Tongue Tie and Lip Tie Treatment

    • Otolaryngologists Are Still Debating the Effectiveness of Tongue Tie Treatment

    • Is Middle Ear Pressure Affected by Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Use?

    • Rating Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Severity: How Do Two Common Instruments Compare?

    • The Dramatic Rise in Tongue Tie and Lip Tie Treatment

    • Rating Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Severity: How Do Two Common Instruments Compare?

    • Is Middle Ear Pressure Affected by Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Use?

    • Otolaryngologists Are Still Debating the Effectiveness of Tongue Tie Treatment

    • Complications for When Physicians Change a Maiden Name

    • Excitement Around Gene Therapy for Hearing Restoration
    • “Small” Acts of Kindness
    • How To: Endoscopic Total Maxillectomy Without Facial Skin Incision
    • Science Communities Must Speak Out When Policies Threaten Health and Safety
    • Observation Most Cost-Effective in Addressing AECRS in Absence of Bacterial Infection

Follow Us

  • Contact Us
  • About Us
  • Advertise
  • The Triological Society
  • The Laryngoscope
  • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • Cookies

Wiley

Copyright © 2025 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies. ISSN 1559-4939