• Home
  • Practice Focus
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
    • How I Do It
    • TRIO Best Practices
  • Business of Medicine
    • Health Policy
    • Legal Matters
    • Practice Management
    • Tech Talk
    • AI
  • Literature Reviews
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
  • Career
    • Medical Education
    • Professional Development
    • Resident Focus
  • ENT Perspectives
    • ENT Expressions
    • Everyday Ethics
    • From TRIO
    • The Great Debate
    • Letter From the Editor
    • Rx: Wellness
    • The Voice
    • Viewpoint
  • TRIO Resources
    • Triological Society
    • The Laryngoscope
    • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
    • TRIO Combined Sections Meetings
    • COSM
    • Related Otolaryngology Events
  • Search

What You Need to Know About CMS Changes to the Physician Fee Schedule for 2021

by Sunil Verma, MD, MBA • April 20, 2021

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
Print-Friendly Version

The criteria used to determine total time spent in the visit now include all time spent on the day of the encounter.

You Might Also Like

  • Letter from the Editor: How 2021 CMS Reimbursement Changes Will Affect Otolaryngology
  • Is the Fee-for-Service Physician Payment Model Doomed?
  • Time-Based Physician Services Require Proper Documentation
  • Supreme Court Finds CMS COVID19 Vaccine Mandate Permissible, Not OSHA
Explore This Issue
April 2021

If a physician and advanced practice provider (APP; i.e., nurse practitioner or physician assistant) perform a shared visit, the time that each provider spends separately can be counted and added together to determine the level of service for the visit. Time that the physician and APP spend together can be counted only once, however, and time that a resident physician spends with a patient alone does not count toward the total time. It’s also important to note that time spent during procedures billed through separate CPT codes, such as flexible laryngoscopy, does not count toward total time.

Medical Decision Making (MDM). The complexity of MDM is based on meeting elements from two of the three following categories (see the table on page 18 for more detailed information):

  1. Number and complexity of problems addressed during the encounter;
  2. Amount and/or complexity of data reviewed and analyzed; and
  3. Risk of complications and/or morbidity or mortality of patient management.

For otolaryngologists, MDM complexity is most often established through documentation of information from elements 1 and 3. It’s important for providers to separately list each problem along with its management. As always, detailing what information is reviewed and outcomes of patient management are vital not only for risk management but also for billing and coding.

Disclaimer note: Please check with your own compliance and risk office as per their interpretation of the CMS rules.


Dr. Verma is an assistant dean of clinical affairs at UC Irvine. He is also the director of the UCI Health Voice and Swallowing Center and the medical director of the department of otolaryngology–head and neck surgery.

Pages: 1 2 3 | Single Page

Filed Under: Features, Home Slider Tagged With: patient care, practice managementIssue: April 2021

You Might Also Like:

  • Letter from the Editor: How 2021 CMS Reimbursement Changes Will Affect Otolaryngology
  • Is the Fee-for-Service Physician Payment Model Doomed?
  • Time-Based Physician Services Require Proper Documentation
  • Supreme Court Finds CMS COVID19 Vaccine Mandate Permissible, Not OSHA

The Triological SocietyENTtoday is a publication of The Triological Society.

Polls

Has your practice or department been affected by the lack of anesthesiologists?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...
  • Polls Archive

Top Articles for Residents

  • Applications Open for Resident Members of the ENTtoday Editorial Board
  • A Resident’s View of AI in Otolaryngology
  • Call for Resident Bowl Questions
  • Resident Pearls: Pediatric Otolaryngologists Share Tips for Safer, Smarter Tonsillectomies
  • A Letter to My Younger Self: Making Deliberate Changes Can Help Improve the Sense of Belonging
  • Popular this Week
  • Most Popular
  • Most Recent
    • Rewriting the Rules of Rhinosinusitis

    • Office Laryngoscopy Is Not Aerosol Generating When Evaluated by Optical Particle Sizer

    • Some Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Resists PPI Treatment

    • Otolaryngologists Are Still Debating the Effectiveness of Tongue Tie Treatment

    • Top 10 LARY and LIO Articles of 2024

    • The Dramatic Rise in Tongue Tie and Lip Tie Treatment

    • Rating Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Severity: How Do Two Common Instruments Compare?

    • Is Middle Ear Pressure Affected by Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Use?

    • Otolaryngologists Are Still Debating the Effectiveness of Tongue Tie Treatment

    • Keeping Watch for Skin Cancers on the Head and Neck

    • Applications Open for Resident Members of the ENTtoday Editorial Board
    • Bottleneck In the OR: How Anesthesiologist Shortages Threaten Surgical Care
    • Onboarding and Working with APPs
    • Evaluating Treatment Patterns in Bell’s Palsy Using Nationwide Employer- Sponsored Healthcare Claims
    • Randomized Trials Comparing Inferior Turbinoplasty Techniques for Nasal Obstruction

Follow Us

  • Contact Us
  • About Us
  • Advertise
  • The Triological Society
  • The Laryngoscope
  • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • Cookies

Wiley

Copyright © 2026 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies. ISSN 1559-4939