• Home
  • Practice Focus
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
    • How I Do It
    • TRIO Best Practices
  • Business of Medicine
    • Health Policy
    • Legal Matters
    • Practice Management
    • Technology
    • AI
    • History of Otolaryngology
  • Literature Reviews
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
  • Career
    • Medical Education
    • Professional Development
    • Resident Focus
  • ENT Perspectives
    • ENT Expressions
    • Everyday Ethics
    • From TRIO
    • The Great Debate
    • Letter From the Editor
    • Rx: Wellness
    • The Voice
    • Viewpoint
    • SUO Corner
  • TRIO Resources
    • Triological Society
    • The Laryngoscope
    • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
    • TRIO Combined Sections Meetings
    • COSM
    • Related Otolaryngology Events
  • Search

Why Otolaryngologists Should Embrace Off-Label Drugs, Devices

by Thomas R. Collins • November 1, 2013

  • Tweet
  • Email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
Print-Friendly Version

The panel ended up asking for “teachability,” or proof that others could learn to use the system as safely and effectively as the applicants. It was the first time such a concept had been attached to an FDA approval, Dr. O’Malley said. The panel eventually found that it takes about 20 cases for an experienced head and neck surgeon to get to the same level as the applicants, and the FDA gave its approval in 2009.

You Might Also Like

  • Making Decisions on When to Use Off-Label Drugs
  • How the U.S. FDA Approves Medical Devices
  • SM14: Treatment for Thyroid Tumors and Benefits of Hearing Devices Spark Debate Among Otolaryngologists
  • Off-Label Cochlear Implantation Common
Explore This Issue
November 2013
“Medicine doesn’t move forward without innovation. Innovation frequently involves the off-label use of drugs or devices.”

—Michael Rutter, MD

Building Relationships with Patients

Michael Rutter, MD, a pediatric otolaryngologist and director of clinical research at Cincinnati Children’s Hospital Medical Center, said that not only can off-label uses mean good medicine, but they are also necessary to advance the field. “Medicine doesn’t move forward without innovation,” he said. “Innovation frequently involves the off-label use of drugs or devices.”

Among other off-label uses, Dr. Rutter introduced the use of angioplasty balloon dilators for dilation in pediatric tracheoplasty cases in 2001. They’ve used the technique 1,900 times, he said. “A lot of the surgical innovation that we’ve developed in Cincinnati arose out of the personal relationship we have between [a doctor] and a family,” he said. “Most families are willing to let you try if you have a relationship with them and they trust you.”

Not only is communication with the family important, but family dissent is essentially the only thing preventing surgeons from using devices in a different way than intended, modifying devices or using drugs in an off-label way. “There are very few checks and balances between you and your relationship with the patient and the family,” he said.

Pages: 1 2 3 | Single Page

Filed Under: Features Tagged With: AAO-HNS annual meeting, medical devices, off-label drugs, otolaryngologist, patient careIssue: November 2013

You Might Also Like:

  • Making Decisions on When to Use Off-Label Drugs
  • How the U.S. FDA Approves Medical Devices
  • SM14: Treatment for Thyroid Tumors and Benefits of Hearing Devices Spark Debate Among Otolaryngologists
  • Off-Label Cochlear Implantation Common

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

The Triological SocietyENTtoday is a publication of The Triological Society.

Polls

How have you adopted advanced technologies in your practice?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...
  • Polls Archive

Top Articles for Residents

  • Is the SLOR in Otolaryngology Residency Applications Contributing to Rural Disparities?
  • Applications Open for Resident Members of the ENTtoday Editorial Board: Deadline Extended
  • A Resident’s View of AI in Otolaryngology
  • Call for Resident Bowl Questions
  • Resident Pearls: Pediatric Otolaryngologists Share Tips for Safer, Smarter Tonsillectomies
  • Popular this Week
  • Most Popular
  • Most Recent
    • Novel Treatments and Advances in OSA
    • The Reasons We Keep Going
    • Some Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Resists PPI Treatment
    • The Dramatic Rise in Tongue Tie and Lip Tie Treatment
    • Dr. Rebecca Howell’s Circuitous, Yet Serendipitous, Path to Laryngology
    • The Dramatic Rise in Tongue Tie and Lip Tie Treatment
    • Rating Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Severity: How Do Two Common Instruments Compare?
    • Is Middle Ear Pressure Affected by Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Use?
    • Otolaryngologists Are Still Debating the Effectiveness of Tongue Tie Treatment
    • Complications for When Physicians Change a Maiden Name
    • ENTtoday Wins 2026 APEX Award
    • AI-Powered Real-Time Multimodal Model for Predicting Recurrence and Survival in Head and Neck Cancer: A Multicenter, Multinational Study
    • Voices of Leadership: Challenges Faced by Female Facial Plastic Surgeons and Considerations for Future Generations
    • AI in the Diagnosis of Cholesteatoma: A Systematic Review of Current Evidence
    • Gender Identity Disparities in Early Adolescent Sleep: Findings from the Adolescent Brain Cognitive Development Study

Follow Us

  • Contact Us
  • About Us
  • Advertise
  • The Triological Society
  • The Laryngoscope
  • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • Cookies

Wiley

Copyright © 2026 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies. ISSN 1559-4939