• Home
  • Practice Focus
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
    • How I Do It
    • TRIO Best Practices
  • Business of Medicine
    • Health Policy
    • Legal Matters
    • Practice Management
    • Tech Talk
    • AI
  • Literature Reviews
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
  • Career
    • Medical Education
    • Professional Development
    • Resident Focus
  • ENT Perspectives
    • ENT Expressions
    • Everyday Ethics
    • From TRIO
    • The Great Debate
    • Letter From the Editor
    • Rx: Wellness
    • The Voice
    • Viewpoint
  • TRIO Resources
    • Triological Society
    • The Laryngoscope
    • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
    • TRIO Combined Sections Meetings
    • COSM
    • Related Otolaryngology Events
  • Search

Prediction Model for Newborn HL

by Amy Eckner • November 1, 2013

  • Tweet
  • Email
Print-Friendly Version

Can risk factors for bilateral hearing loss (HL) be used to predict HL among infants who do not pass the initial newborn hearing screening?

Background: Children with HL often have delayed academic achievement, lower average reading ability and lower-than-average cognitive test performance. Risk factors are used to help identify infants who pass the initial newborn hearing screening (NHS) in the United States but are at risk for developing delayed-onset HL, or those who may have milder forms of permanent HL.

You Might Also Like

  • Newborn Hearing Screening Affects Age Children Receive Cochlear Implantation
  • Should Infants Who Fail their Newborn Hearing Screen Undergo Cytomegalovirus Testing?
  • Retropharyngeal Abscess Prediction Remains Limited
  • Cincinnati Criteria Identifies More Cases of Enlarged Vestibular Aqueduct
Explore This Issue
November 2013

Study design: Individual retrospective case-control study using medical records of 687 infants (229 HL, 458 control) aged zero to six months of age referred for natural sleep or sedated auditory brainstem response (ABR) in 2005 through 2009.

Setting: Audiology department, St. Louis Children’s Hospital, BJC HealthCare system.

Synopsis: Two children with normal hearing were identified as controls for each one child diagnosed with HL. The most common reason for diagnostic ABR testing was not passing NHS. Mean birth weight and estimated gestational age (EGA) were lower in infants with HL, and more infants with HL had been admitted to a NICU. The ear examination suggested middle ear effusion in 76 HL cases, and nine HL cases had atresia in at least one ear; 65 HL cases had prolonged latencies on ABR. Fifteen HL cases were diagnosed with conductive HL. Congenital cytomegalovirus infection, hyperbilirubinemia, eye problems and Down syndrome were not associated with HL. Among infants who received diagnostic ABR for other reasons, there was an increased rate of several risk factors compared with infants who had not passed NHS. Having none of the risk factors was associated with a low HL risk; having three or more was associated with an extremely high HL risk. Having even one factor raised the HL probability to 50 percent. Limitations included a lack of differentiation in hearing loss between temporary conductive HL, permanent HL and auditory neuropathy spectrum disorder.

Bottom line: The presence of any one of four independently predictive risk factors was associated with a 50 percent hearing loss rate; having three or more was associated with a 90 percent rate of hearing loss.

Citation: Lieu JE, Ratnaraj F, Ead B. Evaluating a prediction model for infant hearing loss. Laryngoscope. 2013;123:2873-2879.

—Reviewed by Amy Eckner

Filed Under: Literature Reviews, Otology/Neurotology, Otology/Neurotology, Pediatric, Pediatric Tagged With: bilateral hearing loss, newbornIssue: November 2013

You Might Also Like:

  • Newborn Hearing Screening Affects Age Children Receive Cochlear Implantation
  • Should Infants Who Fail their Newborn Hearing Screen Undergo Cytomegalovirus Testing?
  • Retropharyngeal Abscess Prediction Remains Limited
  • Cincinnati Criteria Identifies More Cases of Enlarged Vestibular Aqueduct

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

The Triological SocietyENTtoday is a publication of The Triological Society.

Polls

Have you invented or patented something that betters the field of otolaryngology?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...
  • Polls Archive

Top Articles for Residents

  • Applications Open for Resident Members of ENTtoday Edit Board
  • How To Provide Helpful Feedback To Residents
  • Call for Resident Bowl Questions
  • New Standardized Otolaryngology Curriculum Launching July 1 Should Be Valuable Resource For Physicians Around The World
  • Do Training Programs Give Otolaryngology Residents the Necessary Tools to Do Productive Research?
  • Popular this Week
  • Most Popular
  • Most Recent
    • The Dramatic Rise in Tongue Tie and Lip Tie Treatment

    • The Best Site for Pediatric TT Placement: OR or Office?

    • Rating Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Severity: How Do Two Common Instruments Compare?

    • Otolaryngologists Are Still Debating the Effectiveness of Tongue Tie Treatment

    • The Road Less Traveled—at Least by Otolaryngologists

    • The Dramatic Rise in Tongue Tie and Lip Tie Treatment

    • Rating Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Severity: How Do Two Common Instruments Compare?

    • Is Middle Ear Pressure Affected by Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Use?

    • Otolaryngologists Are Still Debating the Effectiveness of Tongue Tie Treatment

    • Complications for When Physicians Change a Maiden Name

    • Leaky Pipes—Time to Focus on Our Foundations
    • You Are Among Friends: The Value Of Being In A Group
    • How To: Full Endoscopic Procedures of Total Parotidectomy
    • How To: Does Intralesional Steroid Injection Effectively Mitigate Vocal Fold Scarring in a Rabbit Model?
    • What Is the Optimal Anticoagulation in HGNS Surgery in Patients with High-Risk Cardiac Comorbidities?

Follow Us

  • Contact Us
  • About Us
  • Advertise
  • The Triological Society
  • The Laryngoscope
  • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • Cookies

Wiley

Copyright © 2025 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies. ISSN 1559-4939