• Home
  • Practice Focus
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
    • How I Do It
    • TRIO Best Practices
  • Business of Medicine
    • Health Policy
    • Legal Matters
    • Practice Management
    • Technology
    • AI
  • Literature Reviews
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
  • Career
    • Medical Education
    • Professional Development
    • Resident Focus
  • ENT Perspectives
    • ENT Expressions
    • Everyday Ethics
    • From TRIO
    • The Great Debate
    • Letter From the Editor
    • Rx: Wellness
    • The Voice
    • Viewpoint
    • SUO Corner
  • TRIO Resources
    • Triological Society
    • The Laryngoscope
    • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
    • TRIO Combined Sections Meetings
    • COSM
    • Related Otolaryngology Events
  • Home
  • Practice Focus
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
    • How I Do It
    • TRIO Best Practices
  • Business of Medicine
    • Health Policy
    • Legal Matters
    • Practice Management
    • Technology
    • AI
  • Literature Reviews
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
  • Career
    • Medical Education
    • Professional Development
    • Resident Focus
  • ENT Perspectives
    • ENT Expressions
    • Everyday Ethics
    • From TRIO
    • The Great Debate
    • Letter From the Editor
    • Rx: Wellness
    • The Voice
    • Viewpoint
    • SUO Corner
  • TRIO Resources
    • Triological Society
    • The Laryngoscope
    • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
    • TRIO Combined Sections Meetings
    • COSM
    • Related Otolaryngology Events
  • Search

Babbling Is Necessary for Speech and Language Development

by Sue Pondrom • December 1, 2010

  • Tweet
  • Email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
Print-Friendly Version

What is the importance of pre-linguistic vocalization?

You Might Also Like

  • Cochlear Implant Effective in Language Development if Implanted at Early Age
  • Researchers Examine Links Between Music, Language, and Social Development
  • New Speech-Language Pathology Rule: Supervision of videostroboscopy and nasopharyngoscopy no longer required
  • Language Performance in Disabled Children with Cochlear Implants
Explore This Issue
December 2010

Background: The characterization and significance of pre-linguistic vocalization has long been the subject of research and debate. Pre-linguistic vocalization can generally be classified into non-speech-like vocalizations, including vegetative sounds, and speech-like vocalizations known as protophones. Most protophones begin with vowel-like vocalizations and culminate in well-formed, reduplicated consonant-vowel combinations referred to as canonical babbling.

Study design: Retrospective review

Setting: Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of Michigan Medical School and University of Michigan Health System, Ann Arbor; Department of Speech-Language Pathology, Division of Pediatric Otolaryngology, University of Michigan Health System

Synopsis: Researchers utilized a novel method to evaluate speech and language development in the absence of pre-linguistic practice. Seven children had high-grade, long-segment, subglottic stenosis with tracheostomy placement during the pre-linguistic stage of language development. All seven were aphonic until they subsequently underwent cricotracheal resection and decannulation.

After an initial delay in speech acquisition, vegetative functions were the first laryngeal sounds to emerge, followed by an accelerated progression through canonical babbling to verbalizations. Non-speech-like laryngeal sounds were superseded by protophone development.

The study compared the children’s pre- and post-surgical methods of communication. The researchers concluded that cricotracheal resection facilitates the study of early vocal practice deprivation on subsequent speech and language development. The study did not demonstrate a correlation between use of preoperative sign language and time to speech development.

Bottom line: The observations in this study support the hypothesis that babbling is necessary for speech and language development regardless of the age at which verbalization is physiologically possible.

Citation: Bohm LA, Nelson ME, Driver LE, et al. Babbling, vegetative function, and language development after cricotracheal resection in aphonic children. Laryngoscope. 2010;120(12):2494-2497.

—Reviewed by Sue Pondrom

Filed Under: Laryngology, Literature Reviews, Otology/Neurotology, Pediatric Tagged With: language development, pre-linguistic vocalization, speech, speech developmentIssue: December 2010

You Might Also Like:

  • Cochlear Implant Effective in Language Development if Implanted at Early Age
  • Researchers Examine Links Between Music, Language, and Social Development
  • New Speech-Language Pathology Rule: Supervision of videostroboscopy and nasopharyngoscopy no longer required
  • Language Performance in Disabled Children with Cochlear Implants

The Triological SocietyENTtoday is a publication of The Triological Society.

Polls

More and more medical trainees are taking dedicated, prolonged gap years. Did you?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...
  • Polls Archive

Top Articles for Residents

  • Is the SLOR in Otolaryngology Residency Applications Contributing to Rural Disparities?
  • Applications Open for Resident Members of the ENTtoday Editorial Board
  • A Resident’s View of AI in Otolaryngology
  • Call for Resident Bowl Questions
  • Resident Pearls: Pediatric Otolaryngologists Share Tips for Safer, Smarter Tonsillectomies
  • Popular this Week
  • Most Popular
  • Most Recent
    • Gap Year for Research: Is It Worth It?
    • What Otolaryngologists Can Learn from Athletes
    • Office Laryngoscopy Is Not Aerosol Generating When Evaluated by Optical Particle Sizer
    • What Happens to Medical Students Who Don’t Match?
    • Some Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Resists PPI Treatment
    • The Dramatic Rise in Tongue Tie and Lip Tie Treatment
    • Rating Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Severity: How Do Two Common Instruments Compare?
    • Is Middle Ear Pressure Affected by Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Use?
    • Otolaryngologists Are Still Debating the Effectiveness of Tongue Tie Treatment
    • Complications for When Physicians Change a Maiden Name
    • Short-Term Efficacy of Biologics in Recalcitrant AFRS: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    • The Devaluation of Otolaryngology: An Evaluation of CMS’s Involvement in Physician Reimbursement
    • Embolized Middle Meningeal Artery as a Surgical Landmark in Infratemporal Fossa
    • Lord of the (Magnetic) Rings: Rigid Bronchoscopy for Aspirated Magnetic Foreign Bodies in Tertiary Bronchi
    • What Otolaryngologists Can Learn from Athletes

Follow Us

  • Contact Us
  • About Us
  • Advertise
  • The Triological Society
  • The Laryngoscope
  • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • Cookies

Wiley

Copyright © 2026 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies. ISSN 1559-4939