• Home
  • Practice Focus
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
    • How I Do It
    • TRIO Best Practices
  • Business of Medicine
    • Health Policy
    • Legal Matters
    • Practice Management
    • Technology
    • AI
  • Literature Reviews
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
  • Career
    • Medical Education
    • Professional Development
    • Resident Focus
  • ENT Perspectives
    • ENT Expressions
    • Everyday Ethics
    • From TRIO
    • The Great Debate
    • Letter From the Editor
    • Rx: Wellness
    • The Voice
    • Viewpoint
    • SUO Corner
  • TRIO Resources
    • Triological Society
    • The Laryngoscope
    • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
    • TRIO Combined Sections Meetings
    • COSM
    • Related Otolaryngology Events
  • Home
  • Practice Focus
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
    • How I Do It
    • TRIO Best Practices
  • Business of Medicine
    • Health Policy
    • Legal Matters
    • Practice Management
    • Technology
    • AI
  • Literature Reviews
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
  • Career
    • Medical Education
    • Professional Development
    • Resident Focus
  • ENT Perspectives
    • ENT Expressions
    • Everyday Ethics
    • From TRIO
    • The Great Debate
    • Letter From the Editor
    • Rx: Wellness
    • The Voice
    • Viewpoint
    • SUO Corner
  • TRIO Resources
    • Triological Society
    • The Laryngoscope
    • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
    • TRIO Combined Sections Meetings
    • COSM
    • Related Otolaryngology Events
  • Search

An Inside Look at How the CPT Is Kept Balanced and Current

by Linda Kossoff • November 17, 2021

  • Tweet
  • Email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
Print-Friendly Version

Developed and introduced by the American Medical Association (AMA) in response to the implementation of Medicare in 1966, the Current Procedural Terminology (CPT) coding system has since become the principal uniform language used by healthcare professionals and administrative personnel to describe specific medical services and procedures. To date, CPT encompasses some 10,000 codes, and the set is continually evolving to keep pace with ongoing advancements in science, technology, clinical protocols, data management, and more. Facilitating that tall order requires the complex and multifaceted system that exists today, under the watchful eye and hands-on maintenance and support of the AMA.

You Might Also Like

  • 2013 CPT Code Changes May Impact Your Practice
  • The ABCs of CPT Coding
  • Tips for Coding Inferior Turbinate Surgery
  • What You Need to Know About CMS Changes to the Physician Fee Schedule for 2021
Explore This Issue
November 2021

Although hospitals, clinics, and private medical practices across the country rely on CPT for billing reimbursement, among other things, the system itself, and the process by which it is kept balanced and current, may seem mysterious and even confusing to practitioners and their staff. Indeed, a closer look inside the workings of the CPT coding system reveals a complex world of moving parts that are synchronized enough to coordinate the reporting, supporting, advisory, and decision-making activities of hundreds of people—yet flexible enough to adapt to unanticipated emergencies, such as a global public health crisis.

Defining the Updating Process

The primary responsibility for the curation of the CPT code set lies with the CPT editorial panel (currently expanding from 17 to 22 members), appointed by the AMA board of trustees. The panel comprises an independent body of physicians who typically meet three times a year for multiple days at a time. There are 200 independent advisors to the CPT panel, also appointed by the AMA board of trustees. “This group intersects with all of the approximately 180 medical societies that have seats with the AMA’s house of delegates,” explained Laurie McGraw, senior vice president of Health Solutions at the AMA. The AMA staff supports the panel by providing information, documentation, people power, and technology support— in short, the fuel required to keep the machine running.

“From our perspective, the more we can educate people on CPT and be as transparent and accessible as possible, the better,” said McGraw. To that end, she offered a step-by-step description of the CPT process.

1. Code change requests. “Code change requests are put forth when it appears that there’s a novel innovation or procedure for which there is currently no existing code, an existing code or category of codes that needs to be modified, or a code that needs to be deleted altogether because it’s no longer applicable,” she said.

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 | Single Page

Filed Under: Features, Home Slider Tagged With: billing and coding, practice managementIssue: November 2021

You Might Also Like:

  • 2013 CPT Code Changes May Impact Your Practice
  • The ABCs of CPT Coding
  • Tips for Coding Inferior Turbinate Surgery
  • What You Need to Know About CMS Changes to the Physician Fee Schedule for 2021

The Triological SocietyENTtoday is a publication of The Triological Society.

Polls

More and more medical trainees are taking dedicated, prolonged gap years. Did you?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...
  • Polls Archive

Top Articles for Residents

  • Is the SLOR in Otolaryngology Residency Applications Contributing to Rural Disparities?
  • Applications Open for Resident Members of the ENTtoday Editorial Board
  • A Resident’s View of AI in Otolaryngology
  • Call for Resident Bowl Questions
  • Resident Pearls: Pediatric Otolaryngologists Share Tips for Safer, Smarter Tonsillectomies
  • Popular this Week
  • Most Popular
  • Most Recent
    • Gap Year for Research: Is It Worth It?
    • What Otolaryngologists Can Learn from Athletes
    • Office Laryngoscopy Is Not Aerosol Generating When Evaluated by Optical Particle Sizer
    • MRI Surveillance Should Extend to 10 Years Post- Op for Vestibular Schwannoma Patients
    • What Happens to Medical Students Who Don’t Match?
    • The Dramatic Rise in Tongue Tie and Lip Tie Treatment
    • Rating Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Severity: How Do Two Common Instruments Compare?
    • Is Middle Ear Pressure Affected by Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Use?
    • Otolaryngologists Are Still Debating the Effectiveness of Tongue Tie Treatment
    • Complications for When Physicians Change a Maiden Name
    • Short-Term Efficacy of Biologics in Recalcitrant AFRS: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    • The Devaluation of Otolaryngology: An Evaluation of CMS’s Involvement in Physician Reimbursement
    • Embolized Middle Meningeal Artery as a Surgical Landmark in Infratemporal Fossa
    • Lord of the (Magnetic) Rings: Rigid Bronchoscopy for Aspirated Magnetic Foreign Bodies in Tertiary Bronchi
    • What Otolaryngologists Can Learn from Athletes

Follow Us

  • Contact Us
  • About Us
  • Advertise
  • The Triological Society
  • The Laryngoscope
  • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • Cookies

Wiley

Copyright © 2026 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies. ISSN 1559-4939