• Home
  • Practice Focus
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
    • How I Do It
    • TRIO Best Practices
  • Business of Medicine
    • Health Policy
    • Legal Matters
    • Practice Management
    • Tech Talk
    • AI
  • Literature Reviews
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
  • Career
    • Medical Education
    • Professional Development
    • Resident Focus
  • ENT Perspectives
    • ENT Expressions
    • Everyday Ethics
    • From TRIO
    • The Great Debate
    • Letter From the Editor
    • Rx: Wellness
    • The Voice
    • Viewpoint
  • TRIO Resources
    • Triological Society
    • The Laryngoscope
    • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
    • TRIO Combined Sections Meetings
    • COSM
    • Related Otolaryngology Events
  • Search

Managing Expectations: Facial plastic surgeons emphasize the limits of injectable fillers

by Mary Beth Nierengarten • August 9, 2010

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
Print-Friendly Version

With the availability of noninvasive procedures that use injectable fillers to do the work surgery once monopolized, more people than ever before are seeking the elixir of youth that comes now at the end of a needle rather than a knife.

You Might Also Like

  • Trends in Facial Plastic Surgery: New Patient Groups Bring New Challenges
  • Facial Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery: New Patients, New Reasons, New Techniques
  • Why Facial Plastic Surgeons Should Consider Bringing More Surgical Procedures In-House
  • Is Autologous Fat Grafting Superior to Other Fillers for Facial Rejuvenation?
Explore This Issue
August 2010

For the physicians who wield this needle, communicating the risks of injectable fillers is critical, both to inform the patient of any potential negative outcomes and to modulate the patient’s expectation of what fillers can and cannot do about what nature has either eroded or neglected to give.

Along with educating patients about the number of products available and safely administering the product, Jonathan Sykes, MD, professor and director of facial plastic and reconstructive surgery at the University of California (UC) Davis Medical Center in Sacramento, Calif., and president-elect of the American Academy of Facial Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, emphasized that his job also involves talking about limitations. “There are some patients who want something that won’t work, or it may take more than one injection” he said. “My job is to provide two-way communication to find out what the patient wants.”

What the Patient Wants

Finding out what the patient wants is the first step in discussing the potential risks of fillers, because not fulfilling patient expectations is one of the risks.

“The first thing I try to do with patients is to get a concept of what they want to accomplish and what timeline they want to accomplish that in,” Dr. Sykes said.

Knowing the overall goals of each patient provides the foundation on which to discuss which fillers may or may not be appropriate and the potential risks of various fillers based on the agent used as well as their longevity (See “Complications of Injectble Fillers,” page 21).

“I listen to what concerns the patient, and if a filler is appropriate, I explain both the risks and the benefits,” said Hayes Gladstone, MD, associate professor and director of dermatologic surgery at the Stanford University School of Medicine in Stanford, Calif. For example, he said, if the patient wants lip augmentation, filler with hyluronic acid or collagen may be appropriate, while calcium hydroxylapatite could lead to lumpiness.

After selecting the appropriate filler and procedure, Dr. Gladstone then discusses with the patient the risks and benefits and provides a handout detailing these as well as the procedure itself. Included in the handout is a description of the most common fillers used and what they are best used for (see “Patient Education,” p. 21). When the patient comes in for the procedure, Dr. Gladstone again discusses the risks and benefits.

Pages: 1 2 3 4 | Single Page

Filed Under: Departments, Facial Plastic/Reconstructive, Practice Management Tagged With: facial, facial plastic surgery, injectable fillers, patient communication, patient education, patient safety, reconstructiveIssue: August 2010

You Might Also Like:

  • Trends in Facial Plastic Surgery: New Patient Groups Bring New Challenges
  • Facial Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery: New Patients, New Reasons, New Techniques
  • Why Facial Plastic Surgeons Should Consider Bringing More Surgical Procedures In-House
  • Is Autologous Fat Grafting Superior to Other Fillers for Facial Rejuvenation?

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

The Triological SocietyENTtoday is a publication of The Triological Society.

Polls

Would you choose a concierge physician as your PCP?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...
  • Polls Archive

Top Articles for Residents

  • Applications Open for Resident Members of ENTtoday Edit Board
  • How To Provide Helpful Feedback To Residents
  • Call for Resident Bowl Questions
  • New Standardized Otolaryngology Curriculum Launching July 1 Should Be Valuable Resource For Physicians Around The World
  • Do Training Programs Give Otolaryngology Residents the Necessary Tools to Do Productive Research?
  • Popular this Week
  • Most Popular
  • Most Recent
    • A Journey Through Pay Inequity: A Physician’s Firsthand Account

    • The Dramatic Rise in Tongue Tie and Lip Tie Treatment

    • Otolaryngologists Are Still Debating the Effectiveness of Tongue Tie Treatment

    • Is Middle Ear Pressure Affected by Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Use?

    • Rating Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Severity: How Do Two Common Instruments Compare?

    • The Dramatic Rise in Tongue Tie and Lip Tie Treatment

    • Rating Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Severity: How Do Two Common Instruments Compare?

    • Is Middle Ear Pressure Affected by Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Use?

    • Otolaryngologists Are Still Debating the Effectiveness of Tongue Tie Treatment

    • Complications for When Physicians Change a Maiden Name

    • Excitement Around Gene Therapy for Hearing Restoration
    • “Small” Acts of Kindness
    • How To: Endoscopic Total Maxillectomy Without Facial Skin Incision
    • Science Communities Must Speak Out When Policies Threaten Health and Safety
    • Observation Most Cost-Effective in Addressing AECRS in Absence of Bacterial Infection

Follow Us

  • Contact Us
  • About Us
  • Advertise
  • The Triological Society
  • The Laryngoscope
  • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • Cookies

Wiley

Copyright © 2025 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies. ISSN 1559-4939