• Home
  • Practice Focus
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
    • How I Do It
    • TRIO Best Practices
  • Business of Medicine
    • Health Policy
    • Legal Matters
    • Practice Management
    • Tech Talk
    • AI
  • Literature Reviews
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
  • Career
    • Medical Education
    • Professional Development
    • Resident Focus
  • ENT Perspectives
    • ENT Expressions
    • Everyday Ethics
    • From TRIO
    • The Great Debate
    • Letter From the Editor
    • Rx: Wellness
    • The Voice
    • Viewpoint
  • TRIO Resources
    • Triological Society
    • The Laryngoscope
    • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
    • TRIO Combined Sections Meetings
    • COSM
    • Related Otolaryngology Events
  • Search

Act Locally: Quality and Safety in Head and Neck Care

by Jennifer Decker Arevalo, MA • October 1, 2007

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
Print-Friendly Version

Referring back to Dr. Lore’s prophetic plea for added qualifications from a decade ago, Dr. Weber recommended that physicians, medical organizations, and associations must work to solve these problems concerning quality and safety in head and neck cancer care. Failure to take the lead in assuring outstanding training for head and neck cancer specialists and developing treatment centers with a well-defined multidisciplinary treatment team, while at the same time avoiding the proliferation of inadequate patient management efforts, will lead to the external imposition of standards that may not be in the patient’s best interests.

You Might Also Like

  • ‘Patient-Centered Approach’ Delivers High-Quality Care to Patients with Head and Neck Cancers
  • No Association Between Circulating Tumor Cells and Locally Advanced and Metastatic SCC of the Head and Neck Prognosis
  • How Tumor Boards Can Improve Care for Patients with Head, Neck Cancer
  • Developing Quality Measures in Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery
Explore This Issue
October 2007

We have an obligation to develop these quality standards and to ensure that our patients with head and neck cancer receive the best care available that will provide the optimum change for survival and functional restoration.

Contact the Editor

ENToday welcomes your feedback about our publication! Contact us using the information below:

ENToday@lwwny.com

Reference

  1. Lore, JM Jr. Dabbling in head and neck oncology (a plea for added qualifications). Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1987;113(11):1165-8.

©2007 The Triological Society

Pages: 1 2 3 4 | Single Page

Filed Under: Everyday Ethics, Head and Neck, Practice Management Issue: October 2007

You Might Also Like:

  • ‘Patient-Centered Approach’ Delivers High-Quality Care to Patients with Head and Neck Cancers
  • No Association Between Circulating Tumor Cells and Locally Advanced and Metastatic SCC of the Head and Neck Prognosis
  • How Tumor Boards Can Improve Care for Patients with Head, Neck Cancer
  • Developing Quality Measures in Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

The Triological SocietyENTtoday is a publication of The Triological Society.

Polls

Would you choose a concierge physician as your PCP?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...
  • Polls Archive

Top Articles for Residents

  • Applications Open for Resident Members of ENTtoday Edit Board
  • How To Provide Helpful Feedback To Residents
  • Call for Resident Bowl Questions
  • New Standardized Otolaryngology Curriculum Launching July 1 Should Be Valuable Resource For Physicians Around The World
  • Do Training Programs Give Otolaryngology Residents the Necessary Tools to Do Productive Research?
  • Popular this Week
  • Most Popular
  • Most Recent
    • A Journey Through Pay Inequity: A Physician’s Firsthand Account

    • The Dramatic Rise in Tongue Tie and Lip Tie Treatment

    • Otolaryngologists Are Still Debating the Effectiveness of Tongue Tie Treatment

    • Is Middle Ear Pressure Affected by Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Use?

    • Rating Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Severity: How Do Two Common Instruments Compare?

    • The Dramatic Rise in Tongue Tie and Lip Tie Treatment

    • Rating Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Severity: How Do Two Common Instruments Compare?

    • Is Middle Ear Pressure Affected by Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Use?

    • Otolaryngologists Are Still Debating the Effectiveness of Tongue Tie Treatment

    • Complications for When Physicians Change a Maiden Name

    • Excitement Around Gene Therapy for Hearing Restoration
    • “Small” Acts of Kindness
    • How To: Endoscopic Total Maxillectomy Without Facial Skin Incision
    • Science Communities Must Speak Out When Policies Threaten Health and Safety
    • Observation Most Cost-Effective in Addressing AECRS in Absence of Bacterial Infection

Follow Us

  • Contact Us
  • About Us
  • Advertise
  • The Triological Society
  • The Laryngoscope
  • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • Cookies

Wiley

Copyright © 2025 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies. ISSN 1559-4939