• Home
  • Practice Focus
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
    • How I Do It
    • TRIO Best Practices
  • Business of Medicine
    • Health Policy
    • Legal Matters
    • Practice Management
    • Tech Talk
    • AI
  • Literature Reviews
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
  • Career
    • Medical Education
    • Professional Development
    • Resident Focus
  • ENT Perspectives
    • ENT Expressions
    • Everyday Ethics
    • From TRIO
    • The Great Debate
    • Letter From the Editor
    • Rx: Wellness
    • The Voice
    • Viewpoint
  • TRIO Resources
    • Triological Society
    • The Laryngoscope
    • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
    • TRIO Combined Sections Meetings
    • COSM
    • Related Otolaryngology Events
  • Search

Is There Still a Place for the Head Mirror?

by Gina Roberts-Grey • July 3, 2015

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
Print-Friendly Version

Elizabeth A Blair, MD, associate professor of otolaryngology -head and neck surgery at the University of Chicago, likes the portability of headlights. “It’s challenging to use a head mirror on small children who can’t sit still,” she said.

You Might Also Like

  • Headlight vs. Head Mirror
  • Response from the editor
  • With Change Looming, Head and Neck Surgeons Look in the Mirror
  • Transoral Laser Microsurgery a Viable Option for Head and Neck Patients
Explore This Issue
September 2010

The headlight’s price tag also beckons doctors. When they first went to market, headlights cost thousands, compared to head mirrors, which are priced at around $100. “Now, their price has come down so they’re much more affordable,” Dr. Blair said.

Misperceptions

Misperceptions

In 1982, a non-otolaryngologist wrote a letter to the editor of The Pharos, the journal of the Alpha Omega Alpha Honor Medical Society, criticizing all cartoons and illustrations of physicians wearing head mirrors. He asserted that picturing doctors with head mirrors was archaic since physicians no longer used them. His letter was accompanied by an illustration of a doctor throwing his head mirror into a garbage can. In the next issue, there were letters from several otolaryngologists strongly refuting the assumption that no one used head mirrors. These letters were accompanied by an illustration of doctors retrieving their head mirrors from a garbage can.

A Constant for Residents

But, despite the headlight’s reduced cost and noted convenience, some residency programs refuse to retire their head mirrors and switch strictly to headlights. Two reasons many teaching programs, like those at the University of California, Irvine and the University of Kansas Medical Center, still require residents to train on head mirrors are that they’re lightweight and cast a very bright and clear light. “The hole in the middle allows for binocular vision,” Dr. Verret said.

Head mirrors are easily transported, too. “I also like that I can take it off easily to tuck in my pocket,” Dr. Blair said. “I prefer to use a head mirror whenever possible because I get a very bright beam of light where I need it, improving my ability to see,” he added.

Another added benefit: You don’t need to worry about your batteries running low or remember to recharge the battery pack.

Then there’s the impact the apparatuses have on your appearance and well being. “Head mirrors are gentler to your head. They’re lighter and less bulky so there’s less chance it will give you a headache after wearing one for several hours or all day. The head band doesn’t get caught in your hair and cause breakage, either,” Dr. Blair said.

Pediatric otolaryngology departments, however, feel differently. “We don’t train residents on the head mirror and we don’t use them in pediatrics,” said Deidre Larrier, MD, resident director of otolaryngology at Texas Children’s Hospital. “Head lights are much easier to use.”

The Head Mirror’s Future

Dr. Blair is quick to note that the specialty shouldn’t automatically discard the head mirror, or move completely to the headlight. “When medicine is looking at ways to be more efficient and cost effective, discarding proven technology for something that is more expensive is questionable,” Dr. Blair said.

Pages: 1 2 3 | Single Page

Filed Under: Departments, Home Slider, Practice Management, Tech Talk Tagged With: head mirror, headlights, product development, residents, technology, trainingIssue: September 2010

You Might Also Like:

  • Headlight vs. Head Mirror
  • Response from the editor
  • With Change Looming, Head and Neck Surgeons Look in the Mirror
  • Transoral Laser Microsurgery a Viable Option for Head and Neck Patients

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

The Triological SocietyENTtoday is a publication of The Triological Society.

Polls

Would you choose a concierge physician as your PCP?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...
  • Polls Archive

Top Articles for Residents

  • Applications Open for Resident Members of ENTtoday Edit Board
  • How To Provide Helpful Feedback To Residents
  • Call for Resident Bowl Questions
  • New Standardized Otolaryngology Curriculum Launching July 1 Should Be Valuable Resource For Physicians Around The World
  • Do Training Programs Give Otolaryngology Residents the Necessary Tools to Do Productive Research?
  • Popular this Week
  • Most Popular
  • Most Recent
    • A Journey Through Pay Inequity: A Physician’s Firsthand Account

    • The Dramatic Rise in Tongue Tie and Lip Tie Treatment

    • Rating Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Severity: How Do Two Common Instruments Compare?

    • Otolaryngologists Are Still Debating the Effectiveness of Tongue Tie Treatment

    • Is Middle Ear Pressure Affected by Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Use?

    • The Dramatic Rise in Tongue Tie and Lip Tie Treatment

    • Rating Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Severity: How Do Two Common Instruments Compare?

    • Is Middle Ear Pressure Affected by Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Use?

    • Otolaryngologists Are Still Debating the Effectiveness of Tongue Tie Treatment

    • Complications for When Physicians Change a Maiden Name

    • Excitement Around Gene Therapy for Hearing Restoration
    • “Small” Acts of Kindness
    • How To: Endoscopic Total Maxillectomy Without Facial Skin Incision
    • Science Communities Must Speak Out When Policies Threaten Health and Safety
    • Observation Most Cost-Effective in Addressing AECRS in Absence of Bacterial Infection

Follow Us

  • Contact Us
  • About Us
  • Advertise
  • The Triological Society
  • The Laryngoscope
  • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • Cookies

Wiley

Copyright © 2025 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies. ISSN 1559-4939