• Home
  • Practice Focus
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
    • How I Do It
    • TRIO Best Practices
  • Business of Medicine
    • Health Policy
    • Legal Matters
    • Practice Management
    • Tech Talk
    • AI
  • Literature Reviews
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
  • Career
    • Medical Education
    • Professional Development
    • Resident Focus
  • ENT Perspectives
    • ENT Expressions
    • Everyday Ethics
    • From TRIO
    • The Great Debate
    • Letter From the Editor
    • Rx: Wellness
    • The Voice
    • Viewpoint
  • TRIO Resources
    • Triological Society
    • The Laryngoscope
    • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
    • TRIO Combined Sections Meetings
    • COSM
    • Related Otolaryngology Events
  • Search

At the Sharp End of the System: Disclosure and Apology in Otolaryngology

by Andrea M. Sattinger • December 1, 2006

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
Print-Friendly Version

I apologized to a patient and his family the day before yesterday because I forgot to do the tracheal esophageal (TE) puncture that I’d told the patient I was going to perform. The pharyngeal closure was difficult and at the completion of the procedure, I realized I had forgotten to place the TE puncture. I did not tell the patient and family that I had decided not to do it because the closure was difficult, because that was not true. I told them, I was focused on the fact that the closure was difficult and because my brain was working with that, I just plain forgot and I’m very sorry because it now means that you are going to need another operation at some time in the future to place this tracheal esophageal puncture. To me this represents the fundamental essence, if you will, of apology. With the patient and family, I went over the 4 R’s: recognition [that there was an error], regret, responsibility, and remedy. I also pointed out to them that I have now changed my system in the OR: every time I request the NG tube, which you use at the same time of the procedure, I will also be handed the instrument and catheter to perform a TE puncture.

You Might Also Like

  • Experts Urge Building Support System Before Jumping on Apology Bandwagon: ‘Be Proactive, Not Reactive’
  • Small Changes, Stark Differences: Errors in Otolaryngology
  • Adverse Event Aftermath: Departments are creating programs to help physicians cope
  • Disclosure of Adverse Outcomes Brings Ethical Challenges for Otolaryngologists
Explore This Issue
December 2006

Resources on the Web

SorryWorks!

www.sorryworks.net/media.phtml

Doctors, insurers, patients, lawyers, hospital administrators, and researchers joining together to provide a ‘middle ground’ solution to the medical malpractice crisis

Johns Hopkins scenarios

www.jhsph.edu/dept/hpm/research/Wu_video.html

Removing Insult from Injury: Disclosing Adverse Events

References

  1. Lander LI, Connor JA, Shah RK, et al. Otolaryngologists’ responses to errors and adverse events. Laryngoscope 2006;116:1114-20.
    [Context Link]
  2. Roberson DW, Kentala E, Healy GB. Quality and safety in a complex world: why systems science matters to otolaryngologists. Laryngoscope 2004;114:1810-4.
    [Context Link]
  3. Shah RK, Kentala E, Healy GB, et al. Classification and consequences of errors in otolaryngology. Laryngoscope 2004;114:1322-35.
    [Context Link]
  4. Shah RK, Roberson DW, Healy GB. Errors and adverse events in otolaryngology. Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2006;14:164-9.
    [Context Link]
  5. Stelfox HT, Palmisani S, Scurlock C, et al. The To Err is Human report and the patient safety literature. Qual Saf Health Care 2006;15:174-8.
    [Context Link]
  6. Mazor KM, Simon SR, Gurwitz JH. Communicating with patients about medical errors: a review of the literature. Arch Intern Med 2004;164:1690-7.
    [Context Link]
  7. Kohn LT, Corrigan JM, Donaldson MS, Institute of Medicine Committee on Quality of Health Care in America. To Err is Human: Building a Safer Health System. Washington, DC: National Academy Press; 1999.
    [Context Link]
  8. Elder NC, Dovey SM. Classification of medical errors and preventable adverse events in primary care: a synthesis of the literature. J Fam Pract 2002;51:927-32.
    [Context Link]
  9. Elder NC, Jacobson CJ, Zink T, et al. How experiencing preventable medical problems changed patients’ interactions with primary health care. Ann Fam Med 2005;3:537-44.
    [Context Link]
  10. Woods MS, Star JI. Healing Words: The Power of Apology in Medicine. Santa Fe, NM: Doctors in Touch; 2004.
    [Context Link]
  11. Duclos CW, Eichler M, Taylor L, et al. Patient perspectives of patient-provider communication after adverse events. Int J Qual Health Care 2005;17:479-86.
    [Context Link]
  12. Hoy EW. Disclosing medical errors to patients. Ear Nose Throat J 2006;85:410.
    [Context Link]
  13. Lazare A. Apology in medical practice: an emerging clinical skill. JAMA 2006;296:1401-4.
    [Context Link]
  14. Leape LL. Editorial. Physician self-examination. Int J Qual Health Care 1998;10:289-90.
    [Context Link]
  15. Leape LL. Errors are not diseases: they are symptoms of diseases. Laryngoscope 2004;114:1320-1.
    [Context Link]
  16. Leape LL, Rogers G, Hanna D, et al. Developing and implementing new safe practices: voluntary adoption through statewide collaboratives. Qual Saf Health Care 2006;15:289-95.
    [Context Link]
  17. Longo DR, Hewett JE, Ge B, et al. The long road to patient safety: a status report on patient safety systems. JAMA 2005;294:2858-65.
    [Context Link]
  18. Lubell J, DoBias M. Medication errors persist: IOM. Report highlights steps to reduce severity, frequency. Mod Healthc 2006;36:10.
    [Context Link]
  19. Chan DK, Gallagher TH, Reznick R, et al. How surgeons disclose medical errors to patients: a study using standardized patients. Surgery 2005;138:851-8.
    [Context Link]
  20. Wu AW. Handling hospital errors: is disclosure the best defense? 1999;131:970-2.
    [Context Link]
  21. Cantor MD, Barach P, Derse A, et al. Disclosing adverse events to patients. Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf 2005;31:5-12.
    [Context Link]
  22. Gallagher TH, Garbutt JM, Waterman AD, et al. Choosing your words carefully: how physicians would disclose harmful medical errors to patients. Arch Int Med 2006;166:1585-93.
    [Context Link]
  23. Wu AW. Medical error: the second victim. BMJ 2000;320:726-7.
    [Context Link]

©2006 The Triological Society

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 | Single Page

Filed Under: Departments, Health Policy, Legal Matters, Practice Management Tagged With: disclosure, legal, malpractice, medical errors, patient communication, patient safety, practice management, researchIssue: December 2006

You Might Also Like:

  • Experts Urge Building Support System Before Jumping on Apology Bandwagon: ‘Be Proactive, Not Reactive’
  • Small Changes, Stark Differences: Errors in Otolaryngology
  • Adverse Event Aftermath: Departments are creating programs to help physicians cope
  • Disclosure of Adverse Outcomes Brings Ethical Challenges for Otolaryngologists

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

The Triological SocietyENTtoday is a publication of The Triological Society.

Polls

Would you choose a concierge physician as your PCP?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...
  • Polls Archive

Top Articles for Residents

  • Applications Open for Resident Members of ENTtoday Edit Board
  • How To Provide Helpful Feedback To Residents
  • Call for Resident Bowl Questions
  • New Standardized Otolaryngology Curriculum Launching July 1 Should Be Valuable Resource For Physicians Around The World
  • Do Training Programs Give Otolaryngology Residents the Necessary Tools to Do Productive Research?
  • Popular this Week
  • Most Popular
  • Most Recent
    • The Dramatic Rise in Tongue Tie and Lip Tie Treatment

    • Otolaryngologists Are Still Debating the Effectiveness of Tongue Tie Treatment

    • Excitement Around Gene Therapy for Hearing Restoration

    • Is Middle Ear Pressure Affected by Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Use?

    • Rating Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Severity: How Do Two Common Instruments Compare?

    • The Dramatic Rise in Tongue Tie and Lip Tie Treatment

    • Rating Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Severity: How Do Two Common Instruments Compare?

    • Is Middle Ear Pressure Affected by Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Use?

    • Otolaryngologists Are Still Debating the Effectiveness of Tongue Tie Treatment

    • Complications for When Physicians Change a Maiden Name

    • Excitement Around Gene Therapy for Hearing Restoration
    • “Small” Acts of Kindness
    • How To: Endoscopic Total Maxillectomy Without Facial Skin Incision
    • Science Communities Must Speak Out When Policies Threaten Health and Safety
    • Observation Most Cost-Effective in Addressing AECRS in Absence of Bacterial Infection

Follow Us

  • Contact Us
  • About Us
  • Advertise
  • The Triological Society
  • The Laryngoscope
  • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • Cookies

Wiley

Copyright © 2025 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies. ISSN 1559-4939