ENTtoday
  • Home
  • COVID-19
  • Practice Focus
    • Allergy
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
  • Departments
    • Issue Archive
    • TRIO Best Practices
      • Allergy
      • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
      • Head and Neck
      • Laryngology
      • Otology/Neurotology
      • Pediatric
      • Rhinology
      • Sleep Medicine
    • Career Development
    • Case of the Month
    • Everyday Ethics
    • Health Policy
    • Legal Matters
    • Letter From the Editor
    • Medical Education
    • Online Exclusives
    • Practice Management
    • Resident Focus
    • Rx: Wellness
    • Special Reports
    • Tech Talk
    • Viewpoint
    • What’s Your O.R. Playlist?
  • Literature Reviews
    • Allergy
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
  • Events
    • Featured Events
    • TRIO Meetings
  • Contact Us
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Triological Society
    • Advertising Staff
    • Subscribe
  • Advertise
    • Place an Ad
    • Classifieds
    • Rate Card
  • Search

Avoid the Hot Seat: How to prepare for a CMS audit

by Christopher Guadagnino, PhD • April 1, 2010

  • Tweet
  • Email
Print-Friendly Version

In February, the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) began rolling out its national Recovery Audit Contractor (RAC) program, aimed at ferreting out improper payments and preventing fraud, waste and abuse in the Medicare system. If you bill for Medicare fee-for-service, you are fair game for a RAC audit. A three-year demonstration of the RAC program, which ended in March 2008, heavily targeted bronchoscopy, injectable drugs and IV hydration therapy. But auditors are rapidly expanding the list, and the permanent program will include adenoidectomies, tonsillectomies, thyroidectomies and other otolaryngology-related procedures.

You Might Also Like

No related posts.

Explore This Issue
April 2010

Program Rationale and Process

CMS has contracted with four regional RACs for the permanent nationwide program; each will use proprietary auditing software to review paid claims from Medicare Part A and B providers to ensure they meet Medicare’s statutory, regulatory and policy requirements and regulations.

The RACs are ramping up their claim review activities in all states, said Connie Leonard, director of CMS’s Division of Recovery Audit Operations. When overpayments are confirmed, the RACs issue letters demanding that you repay your Medicare carrier or intermediary within 30 days. For confirmed underpayments, your carrier or intermediary forwards the additional payment to you, Leonard said.

You can repay an overpayment by check or installment plan on or before 30 days after receiving the RAC demand letter. If you haven’t made your payment by day 41, your Medicare contractor can recoup fees previously paid to you. If you wish to dispute overpayment charges, you can take your case through the usual Medicare claims appeal process. Leonard also explained that RACs offer a “discussion period,” which lasts from the date you get a “Detailed Review Results” letter until the date of recoupment, to give you the opportunity to discuss an improper payment determination outside the normal appeal process.

Some RACs are targeting adenoidectomy, tonsillectomy and several thyroidectomy codes as once-in-a-lifetime procedures.

RAC Obligations

Some physicians audited during the demonstration project found the experience onerous and abusive. In response, CMS has modified the program in several ways, Leonard said. For example:

  • RACs cannot audit claims earlier than three years from the start of the program, with a maximum look-back date of October 1, 2007;
  • RACs are limited to requesting 10 medical records per 45 days from a solo physician, 20 medical records from a small practice of two to five physicians, 30 from a group of six to 15 and 50 from a large group of more than 16 physicians;
  • Each RAC must hire a physician medical director and certified coders, and you may request the credentials of your auditor and ask to speak to your RAC’s medical director regarding a claim denial; and
  • RACs must have a Web-based claim status platform that will allow you to track the status of medical record submissions to RACs.

Codes to Watch

The majority of improper payments under the RAC demo program stemmed from providers billing for services that were incorrectly coded or did not meet Medicare’s medical necessity policies, according to the CMS.

Of particular concern to otolaryngologists under the permanent RAC program are once-in-a-lifetime procedures (codes that can be performed only once per patient lifetime), said Charles F. Koopmann, Jr., MD, MHSA, immediate past coordinator of practice affairs of the American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery (AAO-HNS).

Some RACs are targeting adenoidectomy, tonsillectomy and several thyroidectomy codes as once-in-a-lifetime procedures. These codes represent the biggest risk, Dr. Koopmann said, because otolaryngologists don’t always remove all of the tissue, and it is not uncommon for tissue to grow back. “You don’t take out all the adenoids in the usual patient. There’s often residual lymph tissue. In some patients you may do a very limited adenoidectomy to reduce hypernasal speech,” said Dr. Koopmann, who is also associate chair of otolaryngology at the University of Michigan Health System in Ann Arbor, Mich.

Manage an RAC Audit

You can minimize practice disruption from a RAC audit by taking pre-emptive action, Dr. Koopmann said. His advice:

  • Read the RAC material on CMS’s Web site (www.cms.hhs.gov/RAC) to identify current and future audit targets;
  • Educate your staff now about the RAC program. Make certain they know what your RAC’s letterhead and envelope look like. You only have 30 days to respond to a RAC letter, so you don’t want it to lie somewhere unopened;
  • Designate a point person who will act as a liaison with your regional RAC. Train a backup person as well; and
  • Learn the Medicare appeals process. If you think you’re correct, be firm and appeal as quickly as you can. If not, pay as soon as you can.

Robin L. Wagner, COPM, executive director of the Association of Otolaryngology Administrators, also suggested the following:

  • Log all RAC requests onto a spreadsheet;
  • Provide all medical records within 45 days of the RAC’s request;
  • If you receive a notice of overpayment, you can either submit a rebuttal to your RAC auditor or file an appeal directly with your fiscal intermediary (FI). The time allowed for a rebuttal is 15 days; and
  • If you file an appeal, you must file with your FI within 120 days after overpayment is recouped.

Christopher Guadagnino, PhD, is a medical writer based in Pennsylvania.

Pages: 1 2 | Multi-Page

Filed Under: Departments, Health Policy, Legal Matters, Practice Management Tagged With: audit, billing and coding, healthcare reform, legal, Medicare, policyIssue: April 2010

You Might Also Like:

The Triological SocietyENTtoday is a publication of The Triological Society.

The Laryngoscope
Ensure you have all the latest research at your fingertips; Subscribe to The Laryngoscope today!

Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
Open access journal in otolaryngology – head and neck surgery is currently accepting submissions.

Classifieds

View the classified ads »

TRIO Best Practices

View the TRIO Best Practices »

Top Articles for Residents

  • Do Training Programs Give Otolaryngology Residents the Necessary Tools to Do Productive Research?
  • Why More MDs, Medical Residents Are Choosing to Pursue Additional Academic Degrees
  • What Physicians Need to Know about Investing Before Hiring a Financial Advisor
  • Tips to Help You Regain Your Sense of Self
  • Should USMLE Step 1 Change from Numeric Score to Pass/Fail?
  • Popular this Week
  • Most Popular
  • Most Recent
    • The Dramatic Rise in Tongue Tie and Lip Tie Treatment
    • Rating Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Severity: How Do Two Common Instruments Compare?
    • Vertigo in the Elderly: What Does It Mean?
    • Is Radiofrequency Ablation a Good Alternative to Surgery for Benign Thyroid Nodules? A Look at Benefits, Risks
    • What Happens to Medical Students Who Don’t Match?
    • The Dramatic Rise in Tongue Tie and Lip Tie Treatment
    • Rating Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Severity: How Do Two Common Instruments Compare?
    • Vertigo in the Elderly: What Does It Mean?
    • Neurogenic Cough Is Often a Diagnosis of Exclusion
    • Complications for When Physicians Change a Maiden Name
    • Smell and Taste Disorder Differences Seen Between Long-Term COVID-19 and non-COVID-19 Patients
    • The Triological Society is Growing in Ethnic and Gender Diversity as Well as Thesis Acceptance
    • No Persistent Postoperative Swallowing Dysfunction Following Pharyngeal Surgery in Patients with Obstructive Sleep Apnea
    • Do the Principles of Adult Learning Maximize Training Efficiency and Efficacy for Pediatric Otolaryngologists?
    • Prolonged Operative Time Associated with Multiple Adverse Outcomes in Endoscopic Sinonasal Surgery

Polls

Do you think that women have made large enough strides in otolaryngology leadership and gender equity?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...
  • Polls Archive
  • Home
  • Contact Us
  • Advertise
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • Cookie Preferences

Visit: The Triological Society • The Laryngoscope • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology

Wiley
© 2023 The Triological Society. All Rights Reserved.
ISSN 1559-4939