• Home
  • Practice Focus
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
    • How I Do It
    • TRIO Best Practices
  • Business of Medicine
    • Health Policy
    • Legal Matters
    • Practice Management
    • Tech Talk
    • AI
  • Literature Reviews
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
  • Career
    • Medical Education
    • Professional Development
    • Resident Focus
  • ENT Perspectives
    • ENT Expressions
    • Everyday Ethics
    • From TRIO
    • The Great Debate
    • Letter From the Editor
    • Rx: Wellness
    • The Voice
    • Viewpoint
  • TRIO Resources
    • Triological Society
    • The Laryngoscope
    • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
    • TRIO Combined Sections Meetings
    • COSM
    • Related Otolaryngology Events
  • Search

Avoiding the Operating Room: The Advantages of Office-Based Laryngology and Esophagology

by John Austin • August 1, 2006

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
Print-Friendly Version

The surgery, I don’t worry about. I worry about the anesthesia. Once you start sedating someone, and once you start intubating, that’s when the problems arise, he said. Not only do I worry about it, but the literature corroborates it time and again. There is much less risk for the patient and, for those patients who care to, they can go back to work the same day.

You Might Also Like

  • Office-Based FNA Thyroid Nodule Biopsies a Viable Option
  • In-Office Laryngeal Procedures in Awake Patients a Viable, and Often Preferable, Option
  • Adding Office-Based Laryngeal Procedures to Your Practice Can Benefit Patients
  • Novel Method Overcomes Nasal Discomfort in Office-Based Laser Surgery
Explore This Issue
August 2006

There is also a significant economic advantage to performing the procedure in an office-based setting-an economy of both time and money. Dr. Aviv noted the Relative Value Unit (RVU) for direct laryngoscopy and biopsy in the operating room is 5.4, while a TFL biopsy done in the office actually gets reimbursed at a higher value of 5.78.

In our institution, when we do a direct laryngoscopy biopsy, it takes about two hours total. Thirty minutes or so to get the line and put the patient under. It takes us five minutes to do our part and then it takes about 45 minutes to wake the patient up, Dr. Aviv said. If you can do it much faster at your institution, then I want your manual.

Figure. Here are some of the instruments used to take office biopsies using transnasal endoscopy: a biopsy brush, biopsy forceps with a needle, and biopsy forceps (left to right).

click for large version
Figure. Here are some of the instruments used to take office biopsies using transnasal endoscopy: a biopsy brush, biopsy forceps with a needle, and biopsy forceps (left to right).

That works out to about 2.7 RVUs an hour for a procedure performed in-hospital. So how does that compare to in-office?

For the same biopsy in the office, no matter how slow we go, it never takes us more than 30 minutes, he said. That’s about 11.5 RVUs an hour. You don’t need an MBA to figure that one out.

Lasers

Steven Zeitels, MD, Chair of Laryngeal Surgery of Harvard Medical School in Boston, Mass., offered his perspective on the use of lasers in the office setting, including the pulsed KTP, pulsed dye laser (PDL), and the newer thulium laser.

The big issue for us, when you use the PDL, for example, is there was a significant amount of bleeding because of the nature of the PDL, Dr. Zeitels said. That’s not good if you’re working on a patient in the office. If the blood goes under the basement membrane, then you’re going to heat the blood under the basement. If it leaks out, the patient starts coughing and you’re going to get more bleeding and lose your window of opportunity with local anesthesia. You only get about 20 to 25 minutes, and if you re-dose the lidocaine into the trachea, you run the risk of lidocaine toxicity.

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 | Single Page

Filed Under: Departments, Laryngology, Medical Education, Practice Focus, Practice Management Tagged With: COSM, injections, laser, office-based, outcomes, patient satisfaction, surgery, techniques, treatment, vocal cordIssue: August 2006

You Might Also Like:

  • Office-Based FNA Thyroid Nodule Biopsies a Viable Option
  • In-Office Laryngeal Procedures in Awake Patients a Viable, and Often Preferable, Option
  • Adding Office-Based Laryngeal Procedures to Your Practice Can Benefit Patients
  • Novel Method Overcomes Nasal Discomfort in Office-Based Laser Surgery

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

The Triological SocietyENTtoday is a publication of The Triological Society.

Polls

Would you choose a concierge physician as your PCP?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...
  • Polls Archive

Top Articles for Residents

  • Applications Open for Resident Members of ENTtoday Edit Board
  • How To Provide Helpful Feedback To Residents
  • Call for Resident Bowl Questions
  • New Standardized Otolaryngology Curriculum Launching July 1 Should Be Valuable Resource For Physicians Around The World
  • Do Training Programs Give Otolaryngology Residents the Necessary Tools to Do Productive Research?
  • Popular this Week
  • Most Popular
  • Most Recent
    • A Journey Through Pay Inequity: A Physician’s Firsthand Account

    • The Dramatic Rise in Tongue Tie and Lip Tie Treatment

    • Otolaryngologists Are Still Debating the Effectiveness of Tongue Tie Treatment

    • Is Middle Ear Pressure Affected by Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Use?

    • Rating Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Severity: How Do Two Common Instruments Compare?

    • The Dramatic Rise in Tongue Tie and Lip Tie Treatment

    • Rating Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Severity: How Do Two Common Instruments Compare?

    • Is Middle Ear Pressure Affected by Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Use?

    • Otolaryngologists Are Still Debating the Effectiveness of Tongue Tie Treatment

    • Complications for When Physicians Change a Maiden Name

    • Excitement Around Gene Therapy for Hearing Restoration
    • “Small” Acts of Kindness
    • How To: Endoscopic Total Maxillectomy Without Facial Skin Incision
    • Science Communities Must Speak Out When Policies Threaten Health and Safety
    • Observation Most Cost-Effective in Addressing AECRS in Absence of Bacterial Infection

Follow Us

  • Contact Us
  • About Us
  • Advertise
  • The Triological Society
  • The Laryngoscope
  • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • Cookies

Wiley

Copyright © 2025 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies. ISSN 1559-4939