• Home
  • Practice Focus
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
    • How I Do It
    • TRIO Best Practices
  • Business of Medicine
    • Health Policy
    • Legal Matters
    • Practice Management
    • Tech Talk
    • AI
  • Literature Reviews
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
  • Career
    • Medical Education
    • Professional Development
    • Resident Focus
  • ENT Perspectives
    • ENT Expressions
    • Everyday Ethics
    • From TRIO
    • The Great Debate
    • Letter From the Editor
    • Rx: Wellness
    • The Voice
    • Viewpoint
  • TRIO Resources
    • Triological Society
    • The Laryngoscope
    • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
    • TRIO Combined Sections Meetings
    • COSM
    • Related Otolaryngology Events
  • Search

Bundled Payments for Patients with Head, Neck Cancer Launched at MD Anderson Cancer Center

by Richard Quinn • September 8, 2015

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
Print-Friendly Version

Curbing Spending

Rena Conti, PhD, assistant professor in the departments of pediatrics and public health sciences at the University of Chicago, said that pilot programs like the one at MD Anderson are a clear response to the need for getting a handle on cancer spending. Starting small with a program that might encompass as many as 150 patients over two years is a smart approach, she added. “Here’s an opportunity to learn how to manage a complex patient population and a complex disease type without putting a lot of practice money at risk,” she said.

You Might Also Like

  • How Tumor Boards Can Improve Care for Patients with Head, Neck Cancer
  • Head and Neck Cancer Patients Who Don’t Drink or Smoke Have Worse Outcomes
  • Head Neck Cancer Associated with Significant Incremental Increases in Annual Healthcare Expenditures
  • Patients in Head and Neck Cancer Trials Don’t Reflect Clinical Practice
Explore This Issue
September 2015

She anticipates that Medicare, “the dominant payer for cancer treatment in America,” will eventually move away from fee for service to alternative payment models and that pilots like the MD Anderson initiative will help prepare physicians and institutions for that transformation.

“It’s important to get a handle on what costs you can control and what aspects you can’t control as a practice, and these opportunities to work with private insurers, either for a set of cancers or for a select cancer, are first opportunities for practices to figure out … what they can and cannot negotiate for in anticipation for this becoming a reality in fee-for-service Medicare.”


Richard Quinn is a freelance medical journalist based in New Jersey.

The 1-2-3s of the Pilot Program

The pilot program from MD Anderson Cancer Center and United Healthcare provides a set sum for payment coverage for head and neck cancers.

The program, by the numbers:

  • 150: Total patient count expected.
  • 100,000: Amount in dollars the highest payments will exceed.
  • 30+: Patients enrolled so far.
  • 8: Payment bundles available, depending on patient services required.

Source: MD Anderson Cancer Center

Pages: 1 2 3 | Single Page

Filed Under: Departments, Health Policy Tagged With: bundled payment, cancer, insuranceIssue: September 2015

You Might Also Like:

  • How Tumor Boards Can Improve Care for Patients with Head, Neck Cancer
  • Head and Neck Cancer Patients Who Don’t Drink or Smoke Have Worse Outcomes
  • Head Neck Cancer Associated with Significant Incremental Increases in Annual Healthcare Expenditures
  • Patients in Head and Neck Cancer Trials Don’t Reflect Clinical Practice

The Triological SocietyENTtoday is a publication of The Triological Society.

Polls

Would you choose a concierge physician as your PCP?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...
  • Polls Archive

Top Articles for Residents

  • Applications Open for Resident Members of ENTtoday Edit Board
  • How To Provide Helpful Feedback To Residents
  • Call for Resident Bowl Questions
  • New Standardized Otolaryngology Curriculum Launching July 1 Should Be Valuable Resource For Physicians Around The World
  • Do Training Programs Give Otolaryngology Residents the Necessary Tools to Do Productive Research?
  • Popular this Week
  • Most Popular
  • Most Recent
    • A Journey Through Pay Inequity: A Physician’s Firsthand Account

    • The Dramatic Rise in Tongue Tie and Lip Tie Treatment

    • Otolaryngologists Are Still Debating the Effectiveness of Tongue Tie Treatment

    • Is Middle Ear Pressure Affected by Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Use?

    • Rating Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Severity: How Do Two Common Instruments Compare?

    • The Dramatic Rise in Tongue Tie and Lip Tie Treatment

    • Rating Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Severity: How Do Two Common Instruments Compare?

    • Is Middle Ear Pressure Affected by Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Use?

    • Otolaryngologists Are Still Debating the Effectiveness of Tongue Tie Treatment

    • Complications for When Physicians Change a Maiden Name

    • Excitement Around Gene Therapy for Hearing Restoration
    • “Small” Acts of Kindness
    • How To: Endoscopic Total Maxillectomy Without Facial Skin Incision
    • Science Communities Must Speak Out When Policies Threaten Health and Safety
    • Observation Most Cost-Effective in Addressing AECRS in Absence of Bacterial Infection

Follow Us

  • Contact Us
  • About Us
  • Advertise
  • The Triological Society
  • The Laryngoscope
  • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • Cookies

Wiley

Copyright © 2025 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies. ISSN 1559-4939