• Home
  • Practice Focus
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
    • How I Do It
    • TRIO Best Practices
  • Business of Medicine
    • Health Policy
    • Legal Matters
    • Practice Management
    • Tech Talk
    • AI
  • Literature Reviews
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
  • Career
    • Medical Education
    • Professional Development
    • Resident Focus
  • ENT Perspectives
    • ENT Expressions
    • Everyday Ethics
    • From TRIO
    • The Great Debate
    • Letter From the Editor
    • Rx: Wellness
    • The Voice
    • Viewpoint
  • TRIO Resources
    • Triological Society
    • The Laryngoscope
    • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
    • TRIO Combined Sections Meetings
    • COSM
    • Related Otolaryngology Events
  • Search

Can Sharing ENT Performance Bonuses With Staff Pay Off?

by Kurt Ullman • June 1, 2013

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
Print-Friendly Version

Thus, practices have to decide the circumstances under which they can give the staff extra money, how much to pitch into the pot and the best way to distribute it to the employees. Done poorly, an incentive plan can be counterproductive, undermining efficiency and morale. It can be hard for employees to be nice on the phone if they think they are not being treated fairly.

You Might Also Like

  • Pay for Performance: What’s Next?
  • Pay for Performance: Here to Stay-for the Time Being
  • A Pay Cut by Any Other Name Is Still a Pay Cut
  • Interplay Between Physician Employment Agreements, Medical Staff Bylaws Should Not be Ignored
Explore This Issue
June 2013

Divide and Dole Out

The first hurdle is whether a practice can afford to pay anything extra. “I am a firm believer that you don’t give bonuses when you don’t have money to give bonuses,” said Witt.

It is also very important to figure out how much the bonus is actually worth. Participation in some patient satisfaction programs, for instance, may require overhead such as an outside firm to administer and track the surveys. These extra costs to physicians should be repaid before thinking about other uses.

Another question to be considered early in the process is how to divide the remaining money. One way is to look at the measures for the bonus and split the money between the physicians and the staff based on the percentages of the criteria for which each was responsible. Using this method would mean that if the physicians were the focus of 70 percent of the survey, they would get 70 percent of the bonus.

If there is already a standing method to divide up money for other bonuses, such as meeting revenue or profit targets for the practice, these could also be used in this instance. Make sure that the staff understands the process, regardless of the method chosen.

“When changing from paying for volume to paying for quality and satisfaction, we need to consider putting at least some of the money into a pool for staff,” said Joe F. Smith, MD, an otolaryngologist with ENTcare in Dothan, Ala. “These models now mean that physician reimbursement will be based on more than whether or not I treat a patient right. It will also hinge on staff and their interactions.”

Actually dividing up any money available, whether from “new money” bonuses or from incremental increases in general reimbursements, is another decision management will have to make. For example, many practices have bonus programs for employees based on the practice meeting certain revenue and/or income performance targets.

To the extent that successfully meeting quality or satisfaction goals impacts reimbursement directly, this would be a good way to reward and incentivize your staff. Make sure that the criteria for meeting these milestones is incorporated into their employee performance targets.

Pages: 1 2 3 4 | Single Page

Filed Under: Departments, Practice Management Tagged With: patient satisfaction, practice management, salary, staffingIssue: June 2013

You Might Also Like:

  • Pay for Performance: What’s Next?
  • Pay for Performance: Here to Stay-for the Time Being
  • A Pay Cut by Any Other Name Is Still a Pay Cut
  • Interplay Between Physician Employment Agreements, Medical Staff Bylaws Should Not be Ignored

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

The Triological SocietyENTtoday is a publication of The Triological Society.

Polls

Would you choose a concierge physician as your PCP?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...
  • Polls Archive

Top Articles for Residents

  • Applications Open for Resident Members of ENTtoday Edit Board
  • How To Provide Helpful Feedback To Residents
  • Call for Resident Bowl Questions
  • New Standardized Otolaryngology Curriculum Launching July 1 Should Be Valuable Resource For Physicians Around The World
  • Do Training Programs Give Otolaryngology Residents the Necessary Tools to Do Productive Research?
  • Popular this Week
  • Most Popular
  • Most Recent
    • A Journey Through Pay Inequity: A Physician’s Firsthand Account

    • The Dramatic Rise in Tongue Tie and Lip Tie Treatment

    • Otolaryngologists Are Still Debating the Effectiveness of Tongue Tie Treatment

    • Is Middle Ear Pressure Affected by Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Use?

    • Rating Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Severity: How Do Two Common Instruments Compare?

    • The Dramatic Rise in Tongue Tie and Lip Tie Treatment

    • Rating Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Severity: How Do Two Common Instruments Compare?

    • Is Middle Ear Pressure Affected by Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Use?

    • Otolaryngologists Are Still Debating the Effectiveness of Tongue Tie Treatment

    • Complications for When Physicians Change a Maiden Name

    • Excitement Around Gene Therapy for Hearing Restoration
    • “Small” Acts of Kindness
    • How To: Endoscopic Total Maxillectomy Without Facial Skin Incision
    • Science Communities Must Speak Out When Policies Threaten Health and Safety
    • Observation Most Cost-Effective in Addressing AECRS in Absence of Bacterial Infection

Follow Us

  • Contact Us
  • About Us
  • Advertise
  • The Triological Society
  • The Laryngoscope
  • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • Cookies

Wiley

Copyright © 2025 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies. ISSN 1559-4939