• Home
  • Practice Focus
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
    • How I Do It
    • TRIO Best Practices
  • Business of Medicine
    • Health Policy
    • Legal Matters
    • Practice Management
    • Tech Talk
    • AI
  • Literature Reviews
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
  • Career
    • Medical Education
    • Professional Development
    • Resident Focus
  • ENT Perspectives
    • ENT Expressions
    • Everyday Ethics
    • From TRIO
    • The Great Debate
    • Letter From the Editor
    • Rx: Wellness
    • The Voice
    • Viewpoint
  • TRIO Resources
    • Triological Society
    • The Laryngoscope
    • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
    • TRIO Combined Sections Meetings
    • COSM
    • Related Otolaryngology Events
  • Search

Can Sharing ENT Performance Bonuses With Staff Pay Off?

by Kurt Ullman • June 1, 2013

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
Print-Friendly Version

“There are few hard and fast rules that Medicare and the other payers are willing to tell us about,” said Dr. Hunter. “We don’t know that if we do these exact things, we are going to get X amount of dollars. As this evolves, it is imperative that we keep the staff up to date and be upfront about what we do, or do not, know.”

You Might Also Like

  • Pay for Performance: What’s Next?
  • Pay for Performance: Here to Stay-for the Time Being
  • A Pay Cut by Any Other Name Is Still a Pay Cut
  • Interplay Between Physician Employment Agreements, Medical Staff Bylaws Should Not be Ignored
Explore This Issue
June 2013

Remind staff that there is a time lag before finding out how much money, if any, was awarded. This lag can make it harder for both staff and physicians to stay focused.

“These incentives are usually not awarded until the end of the year,” said Witt. “It needs to be reinforced, probably multiple times, that we won’t know the results, or see the fruits of our labor, until next year. If possible, the practice may want to spread the bonus throughout the year, possibly quarterly, to maintain momentum and continually reinforce the need to focus on patient satisfaction.”

Another concern is that there may not be feedback from the various payers on how well a group is doing. It is very likely that the practice may not hear from the insurers until the notification that they have, or have not, qualified for the money.

Communicating what the payers are basing their reimbursement or bonus decisions on should be a priority. To meet the criteria, the staff has to know what it is going to be. This, too, may turn out to be a moving target as many payers roll out what are likely to be different programs.

“As the information on these plans is released, embrace them and do the best job you can implementing them within the office to take care of our patients,” said Dr. Smith. “With great change comes great opportunities, and the ones who embrace them are the ones who will be successful in the new health care system.”

Pages: 1 2 3 4 | Single Page

Filed Under: Departments, Practice Management Tagged With: patient satisfaction, practice management, salary, staffingIssue: June 2013

You Might Also Like:

  • Pay for Performance: What’s Next?
  • Pay for Performance: Here to Stay-for the Time Being
  • A Pay Cut by Any Other Name Is Still a Pay Cut
  • Interplay Between Physician Employment Agreements, Medical Staff Bylaws Should Not be Ignored

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

The Triological SocietyENTtoday is a publication of The Triological Society.

Polls

Would you choose a concierge physician as your PCP?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...
  • Polls Archive

Top Articles for Residents

  • Applications Open for Resident Members of ENTtoday Edit Board
  • How To Provide Helpful Feedback To Residents
  • Call for Resident Bowl Questions
  • New Standardized Otolaryngology Curriculum Launching July 1 Should Be Valuable Resource For Physicians Around The World
  • Do Training Programs Give Otolaryngology Residents the Necessary Tools to Do Productive Research?
  • Popular this Week
  • Most Popular
  • Most Recent
    • A Journey Through Pay Inequity: A Physician’s Firsthand Account

    • The Dramatic Rise in Tongue Tie and Lip Tie Treatment

    • Otolaryngologists Are Still Debating the Effectiveness of Tongue Tie Treatment

    • Is Middle Ear Pressure Affected by Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Use?

    • Rating Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Severity: How Do Two Common Instruments Compare?

    • The Dramatic Rise in Tongue Tie and Lip Tie Treatment

    • Rating Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Severity: How Do Two Common Instruments Compare?

    • Is Middle Ear Pressure Affected by Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Use?

    • Otolaryngologists Are Still Debating the Effectiveness of Tongue Tie Treatment

    • Complications for When Physicians Change a Maiden Name

    • Excitement Around Gene Therapy for Hearing Restoration
    • “Small” Acts of Kindness
    • How To: Endoscopic Total Maxillectomy Without Facial Skin Incision
    • Science Communities Must Speak Out When Policies Threaten Health and Safety
    • Observation Most Cost-Effective in Addressing AECRS in Absence of Bacterial Infection

Follow Us

  • Contact Us
  • About Us
  • Advertise
  • The Triological Society
  • The Laryngoscope
  • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • Cookies

Wiley

Copyright © 2025 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies. ISSN 1559-4939