• Home
  • Practice Focus
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
    • How I Do It
    • TRIO Best Practices
  • Business of Medicine
    • Health Policy
    • Legal Matters
    • Practice Management
    • Tech Talk
    • AI
  • Literature Reviews
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
  • Career
    • Medical Education
    • Professional Development
    • Resident Focus
  • ENT Perspectives
    • ENT Expressions
    • Everyday Ethics
    • From TRIO
    • The Great Debate
    • Letter From the Editor
    • Rx: Wellness
    • The Voice
    • Viewpoint
  • TRIO Resources
    • Triological Society
    • The Laryngoscope
    • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
    • TRIO Combined Sections Meetings
    • COSM
    • Related Otolaryngology Events
  • Search

Carbon Dioxide Laser-Assisted Cartilage Reshaping Otoplasty

by Sue Pondrom • July 2, 2010

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
Print-Friendly Version

How does the new technique of carbon dioxide laser-assisted cartilage reshaping (CO2 LACR) otoplasty work and what are the outcomes?

You Might Also Like

  • A 1,540 nm Wavelength Optimal for Laser-Assisted Cartilage Reshaping for Protruding Ears
  • Carbon Dioxide Laser Scores Well on Patient Tolerance in the Office
  • KTP and CO2 Laser Fiber Stapedotomy Compared
  • Laser vs. Manual Penetration of Stapes Footplate
Explore This Issue
July 2010

Background: With more than 200 different otoplasty techniques, no single technique is considered the standard of care. Otoplasty techniques are cartilage sculpting (cutting), cartilage sparing (suturing) or a composite of the two. Problems associated with these techniques include suture extrusion, loss of correction over time, difficulty reshaping thick cartilage and permanent distortion of the ear.

Study design: Prospective case study.

Setting: Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Menoufyia University Hospital, Shibin Elkom, Menoufyia, Egypt.

Synopsis: Sixteen patients ages four to seven with bilateral prominent ears with unfurled antihelixes and without other associated ear deformities underwent early and final outcome assessments after carbon dioxide LACR otoplasty operations. Assessments included McDowell’s basic goals of otoplasty, patient/parent satisfaction, doctors’ satisfaction and measurements of early and late postoperative degree and change of protrusion. The same doctor performed each procedure, which is described in the article. The average follow-up time was 2.4 years, with no cases requiring revision surgery. In late assessment, 14 patients were pleased and two were “satisfied.” The author said the outcome of laser beams on cartilage depends on the laser wavelength, pulse duration, irradiance and tissue optical and thermal possessions. This retroauricular open approach allocated precise laser application, maintained control of the auricular reshaping process and passed up skin laser interactions. The author commented that there can be multiple negative results with LACR, noting a study by Leclère and colleagues in which LACR was performed without otoplasty surgery, and its drawbacks included prolonged mold use and development of contact dermatitis in six patients.

Bottom line: CO2 LACR otoplasty results in endurance of auricular appearance and symmetry, with good to satisfactory outcomes, but further follow-up is still needed.

Citation: Ragab A. Carbon dioxide laser-assisted cartilage reshaping otoplasty: a new technique for prominent ears. Laryngoscope. 2010;120(7):1312-1382.

—Reviewed by Sue Pondrom

Filed Under: Literature Reviews, Otology/Neurotology Tagged With: carbon dioxide laser-assisted cartilage reshaping, clinical, CO2 LACR, otoplasty, outcomes, treatmentIssue: July 2010

You Might Also Like:

  • A 1,540 nm Wavelength Optimal for Laser-Assisted Cartilage Reshaping for Protruding Ears
  • Carbon Dioxide Laser Scores Well on Patient Tolerance in the Office
  • KTP and CO2 Laser Fiber Stapedotomy Compared
  • Laser vs. Manual Penetration of Stapes Footplate

The Triological SocietyENTtoday is a publication of The Triological Society.

Polls

Have you experienced an increase in in-office rhinology procedures in the last year?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...
  • Polls Archive

Top Articles for Residents

  • A Letter to My Younger Self: Making Deliberate Changes Can Help Improve the Sense of Belonging
  • ENTtoday Welcomes Resident Editorial Board Members
  • Applications Open for Resident Members of ENTtoday Edit Board
  • How To Provide Helpful Feedback To Residents
  • Call for Resident Bowl Questions
  • Popular this Week
  • Most Popular
  • Most Recent
    • Empty Nose Syndrome: Physiological, Psychological, or Perhaps a Little of Both?

    • The Dramatic Rise in Tongue Tie and Lip Tie Treatment

    • History of the Cochlear Implant

    • Otolaryngologists Are Still Debating the Effectiveness of Tongue Tie Treatment

    • Rating Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Severity: How Do Two Common Instruments Compare?

    • The Dramatic Rise in Tongue Tie and Lip Tie Treatment

    • Rating Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Severity: How Do Two Common Instruments Compare?

    • Is Middle Ear Pressure Affected by Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Use?

    • Otolaryngologists Are Still Debating the Effectiveness of Tongue Tie Treatment

    • Keeping Watch for Skin Cancers on the Head and Neck

    • Questions on NIH Funding Leave ENT Researchers Pondering Next Steps and Leaving Everything Up in the Air
    • In-Office Rhinology Practices Continue to Grow
    • How Do We Define “Winning” in the OR?
    • A Letter to My Younger Self: Making Deliberate Changes Can Help Improve the Sense of Belonging
    • How To: Superior Maximization of Sphenoidotomy with Olfaction Preservation in Endoscopic Endonasal Surgery

Follow Us

  • Contact Us
  • About Us
  • Advertise
  • The Triological Society
  • The Laryngoscope
  • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • Cookies

Wiley

Copyright © 2025 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies. ISSN 1559-4939