• Home
  • Practice Focus
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
    • How I Do It
    • TRIO Best Practices
  • Business of Medicine
    • Health Policy
    • Legal Matters
    • Practice Management
    • Tech Talk
    • AI
  • Literature Reviews
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
  • Career
    • Medical Education
    • Professional Development
    • Resident Focus
  • ENT Perspectives
    • ENT Expressions
    • Everyday Ethics
    • From TRIO
    • The Great Debate
    • Letter From the Editor
    • Rx: Wellness
    • The Voice
    • Viewpoint
  • TRIO Resources
    • Triological Society
    • The Laryngoscope
    • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
    • TRIO Combined Sections Meetings
    • COSM
    • Related Otolaryngology Events
  • Search

What Is the Correlation Between EMG Waveforms, Muscle Activation During Intraoperative Neural Monitoring?

by Amy E. Hamaker • March 15, 2017

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
Print-Friendly Version

What is the correlation of physiologically important electromyographic (EMG) waveforms with demonstrable muscle activation used for the reliable interpretation of evoked waveforms during intraoperative neural monitoring (IONM) of the vagus nerve, recurrent laryngeal nerve (RLN), and external branch of the superior laryngeal nerve (EBSLN) in thyroid surgery?

Bottom line
Target musculature is the primary innervated muscle that produces the highest EMG amplitude and is the sole muscle grossly contracting with nerve stimulation.

You Might Also Like

  • ALEs an Alternative to Endotracheal Tube Electrode Neural Monitoring
  • Intraoperative Nerve Latency Measurements Can Indicate Post-Op Neural Function
  • Intraoperative Nerve Monitoring Is Highly Effective in Nonrecurrent Laryngeal Nerve Identification
  • Electrode Configuration Impacts Stability of Nerve Monitoring Signal During Thyroid Surgery
Explore This Issue
March 2017

Background: IONM provides additional functional information during thyroid surgery. Confusion in interpretation of IONM data can ensue when intraoperative EMG waveforms are recorded in isolation from true demonstrable muscular response. Direct stimulation of local muscle fibers with resultant regional contraction could be confused with neural stimulation of a branch of the RLN or EBSLN if EMG morphology is not interpreted correctly.

Study design: Retrospective chart review of 50 surgical sides from 37 thyroid surgery patients with laryngeal nerve IONM from January to December 2015.

Setting: Massachusetts Eye and Ear Infirmary, Boston.

Figure 1. A) Laryngeal twitch can be palpated with a finger placed on the posterior aspect of the larynx during recurrent laryngeal nerve (RLN) or vagal stimulation. B) Stimulator probe points to the left RLN in the photo. Credit: Copyright 2016 The American Laryngological, Rhinological and Otological Society, Inc.

Figure 1. A) Laryngeal twitch can be palpated with a finger placed on the posterior aspect of the larynx during recurrent laryngeal nerve (RLN) or vagal stimulation. B) Stimulator probe points to the left RLN in the photo.

Credit: Copyright 2016 The American Laryngological, Rhinological and Otological Society, Inc.

Synopsis: The target muscle for vagal/RLN stimulation was the ipsilateral vocalis muscle, based on large EMG amplitudes and laryngeal twitch presence (see Figure 1). The target muscle for EBSLN stimulation was the ipsilateral CTM, based on large EMG amplitudes and correlated muscular contraction. In contrast, non-target muscle groups showed small EMG amplitudes and a concomitant lack of muscular contraction. With vagal/RLN stimulation, mean target ipsilateral vocalis EMG amplitude response for all 50 sides was 1,095.7 µV; non-target muscle groups showed much smaller EMG amplitudes, with a mean of 304.0 µV (ipsilateral CTM), 281.6 µV (contralateral vocalis), 45.3 µV (contralateral CTM), and 17.7 µV (ipsilateral straps). With EBSLN stimulation, mean target ipsilateral CTM EMG amplitude response for all 50 sides was 6,379.3 µV; mean amplitudes for non-target muscle groups were 156.73 µV (ipsilateral vocalis), 85.4 µV (contralateral vocalis), 65.0 µV (contralateral CTM), and 17.0 µV (ipsilateral straps). The large-amplitude EMG response of the target muscle for both the vagus/RLN and EBSLN systems was correlated with a meaningful muscular response through visualization and/or palpation of target muscle activation, in stark contrast to a lack of any visual or palpable nontarget muscle activation.

Pages: 1 2 | Single Page

Filed Under: Head and Neck, Literature Reviews Tagged With: diagnosis, electromyographic waveforms, EMG, intraoperative neural monitoring, IONM, muscle activation, thryoid surgeryIssue: March 2017

You Might Also Like:

  • ALEs an Alternative to Endotracheal Tube Electrode Neural Monitoring
  • Intraoperative Nerve Latency Measurements Can Indicate Post-Op Neural Function
  • Intraoperative Nerve Monitoring Is Highly Effective in Nonrecurrent Laryngeal Nerve Identification
  • Electrode Configuration Impacts Stability of Nerve Monitoring Signal During Thyroid Surgery

The Triological SocietyENTtoday is a publication of The Triological Society.

Polls

Have you invented or patented something that betters the field of otolaryngology?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...
  • Polls Archive

Top Articles for Residents

  • Applications Open for Resident Members of ENTtoday Edit Board
  • How To Provide Helpful Feedback To Residents
  • Call for Resident Bowl Questions
  • New Standardized Otolaryngology Curriculum Launching July 1 Should Be Valuable Resource For Physicians Around The World
  • Do Training Programs Give Otolaryngology Residents the Necessary Tools to Do Productive Research?
  • Popular this Week
  • Most Popular
  • Most Recent
    • The Dramatic Rise in Tongue Tie and Lip Tie Treatment

    • Otolaryngologists as Entrepreneurs: Transforming Patient Care And Practice

    • Otolaryngologists Are Still Debating the Effectiveness of Tongue Tie Treatment

    • Continued Discussion And Engagement Are Essential To How Otolaryngologists Are Championing DEI Initiatives In Medicine

    • Rating Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Severity: How Do Two Common Instruments Compare?

    • The Dramatic Rise in Tongue Tie and Lip Tie Treatment

    • Rating Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Severity: How Do Two Common Instruments Compare?

    • Is Middle Ear Pressure Affected by Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Use?

    • Otolaryngologists Are Still Debating the Effectiveness of Tongue Tie Treatment

    • Complications for When Physicians Change a Maiden Name

    • Leaky Pipes—Time to Focus on Our Foundations
    • You Are Among Friends: The Value Of Being In A Group
    • How To: Full Endoscopic Procedures of Total Parotidectomy
    • How To: Does Intralesional Steroid Injection Effectively Mitigate Vocal Fold Scarring in a Rabbit Model?
    • What Is the Optimal Anticoagulation in HGNS Surgery in Patients with High-Risk Cardiac Comorbidities?

Follow Us

  • Contact Us
  • About Us
  • Advertise
  • The Triological Society
  • The Laryngoscope
  • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • Cookies

Wiley

Copyright © 2025 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies. ISSN 1559-4939