• Home
  • Practice Focus
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
    • How I Do It
    • TRIO Best Practices
  • Business of Medicine
    • Health Policy
    • Legal Matters
    • Practice Management
    • Tech Talk
    • AI
  • Literature Reviews
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
  • Career
    • Medical Education
    • Professional Development
    • Resident Focus
  • ENT Perspectives
    • ENT Expressions
    • Everyday Ethics
    • From TRIO
    • The Great Debate
    • Letter From the Editor
    • Rx: Wellness
    • The Voice
    • Viewpoint
  • TRIO Resources
    • Triological Society
    • The Laryngoscope
    • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
    • TRIO Combined Sections Meetings
    • COSM
    • Related Otolaryngology Events
  • Search

Intraoperative Nerve Latency Measurements Can Indicate Post-Op Neural Function

by Amy Hamaker • February 10, 2015

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
Print-Friendly Version

What is the normative amplitude and latency of the vagus, the recurrent laryngeal nerve (RLN), and the external branch of superior laryngeal nerve (EBSLN), and how do they indicate post-operative neural function?

Background: In neural monitoring, a visually identified, surgically preserved, structurally intact nerve may not necessarily function normally. Intraoperative nerve monitoring (IONM) during thyroid and parathyroid surgery has gained widespread acceptance as an adjunct to visual nerve identification, which is known to be exceedingly poor. Recognizing latency (and amplitude) measurement variations from normative (pre-dissection) values will alert surgeons to the possibility of an adverse surgical maneuver.

You Might Also Like

  • What Is the Correlation Between EMG Waveforms, Muscle Activation During Intraoperative Neural Monitoring?
  • Intraoperative Nerve Monitoring Is Highly Effective in Nonrecurrent Laryngeal Nerve Identification
  • ALEs an Alternative to Endotracheal Tube Electrode Neural Monitoring
  • Do Nimodipine and Steroids Influence Recovery Time in Post-Thyroidectomy Recurrent Laryngeal Nerve Paralysis?
Explore This Issue
February 2015

Study design: Quantitative analysis of evoked waveform data performed on both sides in 25 consecutive patients aged 32 to 75 years undergoing thyroid surgery from February to April 2008.

Setting: Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston.

Synopsis: During surgery, pulsatile neural stimulus at 4 Hz, duration 100 µs at 1 to 2 mA was used. The mean left vagal latency was 8.14 ms, compared with a mean right vagal latency of 5.47 ms. Mean left RLN latency was 4.19 ms, compared with a mean right RLN latency of 3.73 ms. Pooled RLN mean latency was 3.96 ms, and pooled mean EBSLN latency was 3.56 ms. Pooled mean EBSLN latency was statistically significantly different from left vagal latency and right vagal latency. In ipsilateral comparisons, the mean right vagal latency (5.47 ms) compared to the mean right RLN latency (3.73 ms), and the mean left vagal latency (8.14 ms) compared with the mean left RLN latency (4.19 ms) showed statistical significance. In amplitude, the mean RLN amplitude showed a statistically significant difference to the mean EBSLN amplitude. Limitations included the small number of patients in the study, and the fact that data relate specifically to the authors’ utilized IONM device and setup parameters.

Bottom line: The unique right vagus, left vagus, and RLN latencies are characteristic of the individual nerves and allow the identification of an intact left or right vagus/RLN system.

Citation: Sritharan N, Chase M, Kamani D, Randolph M, Randolph GW. The vagus nerve, recurrent laryngeal nerve, and external branch of the superior laryngeal nerve have unique latencies allowing for intraoperative documentation of intact neural function during thyroid surgery. Laryngoscope. 2015;125:E84-E89.

—Reviewed by Amy Hamaker

Filed Under: Laryngology, Literature Reviews Tagged With: neural function, recurrent laryngeal nerve, surgeryIssue: February 2015

You Might Also Like:

  • What Is the Correlation Between EMG Waveforms, Muscle Activation During Intraoperative Neural Monitoring?
  • Intraoperative Nerve Monitoring Is Highly Effective in Nonrecurrent Laryngeal Nerve Identification
  • ALEs an Alternative to Endotracheal Tube Electrode Neural Monitoring
  • Do Nimodipine and Steroids Influence Recovery Time in Post-Thyroidectomy Recurrent Laryngeal Nerve Paralysis?

The Triological SocietyENTtoday is a publication of The Triological Society.

Polls

Would you choose a concierge physician as your PCP?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...
  • Polls Archive

Top Articles for Residents

  • Applications Open for Resident Members of ENTtoday Edit Board
  • How To Provide Helpful Feedback To Residents
  • Call for Resident Bowl Questions
  • New Standardized Otolaryngology Curriculum Launching July 1 Should Be Valuable Resource For Physicians Around The World
  • Do Training Programs Give Otolaryngology Residents the Necessary Tools to Do Productive Research?
  • Popular this Week
  • Most Popular
  • Most Recent
    • The Dramatic Rise in Tongue Tie and Lip Tie Treatment

    • Otolaryngologists Are Still Debating the Effectiveness of Tongue Tie Treatment

    • Is Middle Ear Pressure Affected by Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Use?

    • Rating Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Severity: How Do Two Common Instruments Compare?

    • 22 Symptoms Common to Patients with Superior Canal Dehiscence Syndrome

    • The Dramatic Rise in Tongue Tie and Lip Tie Treatment

    • Rating Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Severity: How Do Two Common Instruments Compare?

    • Is Middle Ear Pressure Affected by Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Use?

    • Otolaryngologists Are Still Debating the Effectiveness of Tongue Tie Treatment

    • Complications for When Physicians Change a Maiden Name

    • Excitement Around Gene Therapy for Hearing Restoration
    • “Small” Acts of Kindness
    • How To: Endoscopic Total Maxillectomy Without Facial Skin Incision
    • Science Communities Must Speak Out When Policies Threaten Health and Safety
    • Observation Most Cost-Effective in Addressing AECRS in Absence of Bacterial Infection

Follow Us

  • Contact Us
  • About Us
  • Advertise
  • The Triological Society
  • The Laryngoscope
  • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • Cookies

Wiley

Copyright © 2025 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies. ISSN 1559-4939