ENTtoday
  • Home
  • COVID-19
  • Practice Focus
    • Allergy
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
  • Departments
    • Issue Archive
    • TRIO Best Practices
      • Allergy
      • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
      • Head and Neck
      • Laryngology
      • Otology/Neurotology
      • Pediatric
      • Rhinology
      • Sleep Medicine
    • Career Development
    • Case of the Month
    • Everyday Ethics
    • Health Policy
    • Legal Matters
    • Letter From the Editor
    • Medical Education
    • Online Exclusives
    • Practice Management
    • Resident Focus
    • Rx: Wellness
    • Special Reports
    • Tech Talk
    • Viewpoint
    • What’s Your O.R. Playlist?
  • Literature Reviews
    • Allergy
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
  • Events
    • Featured Events
    • TRIO Meetings
  • Contact Us
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Triological Society
    • Advertising Staff
    • Subscribe
  • Advertise
    • Place an Ad
    • Classifieds
    • Rate Card
  • Search

Intraoperative Nerve Monitoring Is Highly Effective in Nonrecurrent Laryngeal Nerve Identification

by Amy E. Hamaker • September 24, 2017

  • Tweet
  • Email
Print-Friendly Version

What are the electrophysiological parameters of the nonrecurrent laryngeal nerve (NRLN), and how efficient is intraoperative nerve monitoring (IONM) for successful NRLN identification?

Bottom line
IONM is highly effective in NRLN identification. Right vagus nerve latency in the NRLN group was found to be significantly shorter than in the RLN group.

You Might Also Like

  • Recurrent Laryngeal Nerve Monitoring No Better Than ID Alone
  • Nerve Monitoring System Can Help Identify Functional Separation between Branches of Hypoglossal Nerve
  • Intraoperative Nerve Latency Measurements Can Indicate Post-Op Neural Function
  • What Is the Correlation Between EMG Waveforms, Muscle Activation During Intraoperative Neural Monitoring?
Explore This Issue
September 2017

Background: The NRLN is a common anatomic variation of the right recurrent laryngeal nerve (RLN), which has been associated with an increased risk of injury during thyroid and parathyroid surgery. Previous reports suggest that the NRLN may be under-recognized and under-reported, and paresis and paralysis rates may be 10 times higher than the typical RLN. International neural monitoring guidelines call for routine and systematic use of nerve-stimulating equipment in RLN dissection, but there are very limited published data on the value of nerve monitoring for NRLN identification.

Study design: Retrospective database analysis of 15 NRLNs in a total 682 laryngeal nerves from a single surgeon at a tertiary care center between January 2012 and December 2015.

Setting: Tulane University Health Sciences Center, New Orleans.

Intraoperative view of a right nonrecurrent laryngeal nerve as captured during right thyroidectomy in one of our cases. (A) Right nonrecurrent laryngeal nerve. (B) Right common carotid artery. (C) Retracted right thyroid lobe. Credit: © The American Laryngological, Rhinological and Otological Society, Inc.

Intraoperative view of a right nonrecurrent laryngeal nerve as captured during right thyroidectomy in one of our cases. (A) Right nonrecurrent laryngeal nerve. (B) Right common carotid artery. (C) Retracted right thyroid lobe.

Credit: © The American Laryngological, Rhinological and Otological Society, Inc.

Synopsis: Fifteen NRLNs were identified; all were right sided. Final diagnosis after surgical pathology was malignancy in seven of 15 cases (47%) and a benign disease in eight of 15 cases (53%). Stimulation of the NRLN was performed using 1 mA. Stimulation threshold for the right vagus nerve was 3 mA. The mean initial NRLN amplitude was 1010.5 µV ± 491.59 µV, with a range of 218 to 1,805 µV. The mean final NRLN amplitude was 859.31 µV ± 492.08 µV, with a range of 200 to 1,600 µV. The mean initial amplitudes of the right NRLN, right RLN, right vagus nerve, and both RLNs were compared using analysis of variance and found to be statistically significant. The mean initial NRLN latency was 1.06 ± 0.25 ms, with a range of 0.6 to 1.6 ms. The mean final NRLN latency was 1.09 ± 0.26 ms, with a range of 0.6 to 1.7 ms. Comparison of NRLN, right RLN, and left RLN latencies was significant. The latency associated with right vagus nerve stimulation in the NRLN group when compared with that of RLN group was significantly shorter. Limitations included limited ability to extrapolate to a larger patient population due to a small number of NRLN cases from a single surgeon.

Pages: 1 2 | Single Page

Filed Under: Laryngology, Literature Reviews Tagged With: intraoperative nerve monitoring, nerve monitoring, nonrecurrent laryngeal nerve identification, NRLN, thyroid surgeryIssue: September 2017

You Might Also Like:

  • Recurrent Laryngeal Nerve Monitoring No Better Than ID Alone
  • Nerve Monitoring System Can Help Identify Functional Separation between Branches of Hypoglossal Nerve
  • Intraoperative Nerve Latency Measurements Can Indicate Post-Op Neural Function
  • What Is the Correlation Between EMG Waveforms, Muscle Activation During Intraoperative Neural Monitoring?

The Triological SocietyENTtoday is a publication of The Triological Society.

The Laryngoscope
Ensure you have all the latest research at your fingertips; Subscribe to The Laryngoscope today!

Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
Open access journal in otolaryngology – head and neck surgery is currently accepting submissions.

Classifieds

View the classified ads »

TRIO Best Practices

View the TRIO Best Practices »

Top Articles for Residents

  • Do Training Programs Give Otolaryngology Residents the Necessary Tools to Do Productive Research?
  • Why More MDs, Medical Residents Are Choosing to Pursue Additional Academic Degrees
  • What Physicians Need to Know about Investing Before Hiring a Financial Advisor
  • Tips to Help You Regain Your Sense of Self
  • Should USMLE Step 1 Change from Numeric Score to Pass/Fail?
  • Popular this Week
  • Most Popular
  • Most Recent
    • The Dramatic Rise in Tongue Tie and Lip Tie Treatment
    • Vertigo in the Elderly: What Does It Mean?
    • Experts Delve into Treatment Options for Laryngopharyngeal Reflux
    • Non-Acidic Reflux Explains Lack of Response to H2 Blockers and PPIs
    • How 3D Printing Is Transforming the Pediatric Otolaryngology Field
    • Vertigo in the Elderly: What Does It Mean?
    • New Developments in the Management of Eustachian Tube Dysfunction
    • Some Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Resists PPI Treatment
    • Eustachian Tuboplasty: A Potential New Option for Chronic Tube Dysfunction and Patulous Disease
    • The Dramatic Rise in Tongue Tie and Lip Tie Treatment
    • Why Virtual Grand Rounds May Be Here to Stay
    • Otolaryngologist Leverages His Love of Pinball into Second Business
    • These New Imaging Advances May Help to Protect Parathyroids
    • Is the Training and Cost of a Fellowship Worth It? Here’s What Otolaryngologists Say
    • Which Otologic Procedures Poses the Greatest Risk of Aerosol Generation?

Polls

Have you used 3D-printed materials in your otolaryngology practice?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...
  • Polls Archive
  • Home
  • Contact Us
  • Advertise
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use

Visit: The Triological Society • The Laryngoscope • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology

Wiley
© 2021 The Triological Society. All Rights Reserved.
ISSN 1559-4939

loading Cancel
Post was not sent - check your email addresses!
Email check failed, please try again
Sorry, your blog cannot share posts by email.
This site uses cookies: Find out more.