• Home
  • Practice Focus
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
    • How I Do It
    • TRIO Best Practices
  • Business of Medicine
    • Health Policy
    • Legal Matters
    • Practice Management
    • Tech Talk
    • AI
  • Literature Reviews
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
  • Career
    • Medical Education
    • Professional Development
    • Resident Focus
  • ENT Perspectives
    • ENT Expressions
    • Everyday Ethics
    • From TRIO
    • The Great Debate
    • Letter From the Editor
    • Rx: Wellness
    • The Voice
    • Viewpoint
  • TRIO Resources
    • Triological Society
    • The Laryngoscope
    • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
    • TRIO Combined Sections Meetings
    • COSM
    • Related Otolaryngology Events
  • Search

Corticosteroid Nasal Sprays Approved for Over-the-Counter Use

by Mary Beth Nierengarten • September 7, 2014

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
Print-Friendly Version
Corticosteroid Nasal Sprays Approved for Over-the-Counter Use

In October 2013, the first intranasal corticosteroid nasal spray became available for over-the-counter (OTC) use after the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved Nasacort AQ (triamcinolone acetonide) for the nonprescription treatment of nasal allergy symptoms.

You Might Also Like

  • Irrigations Better Able Than Sprays to Reach Parts of Nasal Cavity
  • Steroidal Sprays for Rhinosinusitis: Experts Assess a Review
  • Treating Allergic Rhinitis: A Patient Experiment
  • Nasal Decongestants Improve Nasal Airflow, but Not Eustachian Tube Function
Explore This Issue
September 2014

The decision was met with some controversy, most notably in a response from the American Academy of Otolarnygic Allergy (AAOA), the American Academy of Allergy, Asthma and Immunology (AAAAI), and the American College of Allergy, Asthma and Immunology (ACAAI). These organizations submitted their response to the FDA detailing their objections to making these sprays OTC due to safety concerns.

In their response, the AAAAI and ACAAI described updated studies that supported their earlier recommendations against the OTC use of intranasal corticosteroid nasal sprays published in a position paper in 2006 (Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol. 2006;96:514-525). Highlighted in both the position paper and a 2013 response to the FDA decision was the need for clinician monitoring of these sprays to avoid potential adverse effects, including growth suppression in children and ocular side effects and osteoporosis in some individuals.

Bryan Leatherman, MD, secretary of the AAOA board of directors, says his organization expressed concern over ensuring patients were receiving an accurate diagnosis of their nasal problems, were given good information about appropriate treatment options, and that they were monitored long-term for potential side effects.

Another concern is that some patients may not be knowledgeable in how to use the product. “We know that these [medications] are extremely effective, but only when used the right way, and with the knowledge that they only should be used once a day,” said Alpen Patel, MD, who serves as AAOA socioeconomic chair. Also, he said, “they may not use it long enough and may prematurely give up on it.”

Effect on Treatment of Patients

According to Timothy L. Smith, MD, MPH, professor of otolaryngology/head and neck surgery at Oregon Health and Science University in Portland and

ENTtoday editorial board member, the approval of this first intranasal spray for OTC use has occurred too recently to know how it will affect patients and otolaryngology practice. “I don’t think anyone knows yet how this will play out, but it needs to be actively monitored,” he said, adding that the issue of approving these sorts of drugs for OTC use is on his radar screen but that he doesn’t have any immediate concerns about their use.

Having said that, he did emphasize the need to place the approval in the context of all medical treatments—namely, the risks and benefits of making these sprays OTC must be weighed. “Any time someone is using a topical corticoid steroid, there is a potential for adverse effects to the nasal cavity and, ideally, you have a clinician to oversee that and look for those types of problems,” he said. “On the other hand, there may be some people who don’t have access to these types of medication who now will have access.”

For Thomas B. Casale, MD, executive vice president of AAAAI and professor of internal medicine in the division of allergy and immunology at the University of South Florida’s Morsani College of Medicine in Tampa, the biggest concern with OTC use of these sprays is not the safety of the drugs themselves but the lack of clinician oversight of the disease process the drugs are used to treat.

While saying that the drugs themselves are fairly safe, Dr. Casale emphasized that optimal treatment of allergies requires consultation with a physician. “Trivializing the disease by using over-the-counter medications may result in impaired quality of life and poorer outcomes for patients,” he said. “Consultation with a physician … would help identify things that the patient can do in addition to medications.”

What Time May Tell

Dr. Smith highlighted the fact that more time will need to pass before otolaryngologists and other clinicians know the full extent of how these OTC sprays will affect their practice. “I imagine there is only a very small proportion of patients who are accessing this nasal spray OTC,” he said. “We have not seen the peak of this, not even close. As other comparable sprays start to go OTC, we will see a shift and then may or may not see an increase in adverse effects from these OTC medications because of the lack of clinician oversight.”


Mary Beth Nierengarten is a freelance medical writer based in Minnesota.

Position of the AAAAI and ACAAI on OTC Use

  • There are significant risks associated with inhaled and intranasal corticosteroids in adults and children, specifically: effects on growth, ocular effects, effects on bone, effects on the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis, and local adverse effects.
  • Any adverse effects may have an insidious onset and may therefore not be obvious for many years.
  • The decision to switch intranasal corticosteroids to OTC status will undoubtedly and unnecessarily cause growth and adrenal suppression in a large number of children.
  • Dose adjustments and the correct monitoring and management of local and systemic adverse effects can only be done in a healthcare setting.

Source: AAAAI, ACAAI, AAP

Pages: 1 2 3 | Multi-Page

Filed Under: Allergy, Features, Practice Focus Tagged With: allergy, rhinitisIssue: September 2014

You Might Also Like:

  • Irrigations Better Able Than Sprays to Reach Parts of Nasal Cavity
  • Steroidal Sprays for Rhinosinusitis: Experts Assess a Review
  • Treating Allergic Rhinitis: A Patient Experiment
  • Nasal Decongestants Improve Nasal Airflow, but Not Eustachian Tube Function

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

The Triological SocietyENTtoday is a publication of The Triological Society.

Polls

Have you invented or patented something that betters the field of otolaryngology?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...
  • Polls Archive

Top Articles for Residents

  • Applications Open for Resident Members of ENTtoday Edit Board
  • How To Provide Helpful Feedback To Residents
  • Call for Resident Bowl Questions
  • New Standardized Otolaryngology Curriculum Launching July 1 Should Be Valuable Resource For Physicians Around The World
  • Do Training Programs Give Otolaryngology Residents the Necessary Tools to Do Productive Research?
  • Popular this Week
  • Most Popular
  • Most Recent
    • The Dramatic Rise in Tongue Tie and Lip Tie Treatment

    • Rating Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Severity: How Do Two Common Instruments Compare?

    • Keeping Watch for Skin Cancers on the Head and Neck

    • Is Middle Ear Pressure Affected by Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Use?

    • Otolaryngologists Are Still Debating the Effectiveness of Tongue Tie Treatment

    • The Dramatic Rise in Tongue Tie and Lip Tie Treatment

    • Rating Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Severity: How Do Two Common Instruments Compare?

    • Is Middle Ear Pressure Affected by Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Use?

    • Otolaryngologists Are Still Debating the Effectiveness of Tongue Tie Treatment

    • Complications for When Physicians Change a Maiden Name

    • Physician Handwriting: A Potentially Powerful Healing Tool
    • Leaky Pipes—Time to Focus on Our Foundations
    • You Are Among Friends: The Value Of Being In A Group
    • How To: Full Endoscopic Procedures of Total Parotidectomy
    • How To: Does Intralesional Steroid Injection Effectively Mitigate Vocal Fold Scarring in a Rabbit Model?

Follow Us

  • Contact Us
  • About Us
  • Advertise
  • The Triological Society
  • The Laryngoscope
  • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • Cookies

Wiley

Copyright © 2025 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies. ISSN 1559-4939