• Home
  • Practice Focus
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
    • How I Do It
    • TRIO Best Practices
  • Business of Medicine
    • Health Policy
    • Legal Matters
    • Practice Management
    • Tech Talk
    • AI
  • Literature Reviews
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
  • Career
    • Medical Education
    • Professional Development
    • Resident Focus
  • ENT Perspectives
    • ENT Expressions
    • Everyday Ethics
    • From TRIO
    • The Great Debate
    • Letter From the Editor
    • Rx: Wellness
    • The Voice
    • Viewpoint
  • TRIO Resources
    • Triological Society
    • The Laryngoscope
    • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
    • TRIO Combined Sections Meetings
    • COSM
    • Related Otolaryngology Events
  • Search

Developments in Testing for, Treating Obstructive Sleep Apnea

by Jennifer Decker Arevalo, MA • October 1, 2007

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
Print-Friendly Version

The Holter apnea monitor was used on 14 adult patients and the Holter oximeter on 47 adults and three children between March 2006 and January 2007 in an unattended home setting. After placing chest electrodes on patients and securing the oximetry finger probe on those using the Holter oximeter, the medical assistant instructed the patients (or parents) on the use and removal of the device. Patients were also instructed to record the time at which they went to sleep, awoke, or experienced any other events during the night.

You Might Also Like

  • No Significant Association Between Laryngopharyngeal Reflux and Obstructive Sleep Apnea
  • New Developments Regarding Hypoglossal Nerve Stimulation for Obstructive Sleep Apnea
  • Can Lingual Tonsillectomy Improve Pediatric Obstructive Sleep Apnea?
  • Adding Enhanced Measurements to Drug-Induced Sleep Endoscopy Aids in Distinguishing Central from Obstructive Sleep Apnea in Patients
Explore This Issue
October 2007

Patients were also asked to complete a brief questionnaire regarding any discomfort related to the device. Few patients complained about sleeping with the device and none complained about it interfering with their daily life, even the children, said Dr. Stern. In fact, most patients were surprised and pleased with the ease of use and rapid test results.

When the device was returned the next day, the medical assistant obtained any other information regarding the test and inquired specifically about electrode disconnections during the test. The assistant then transferred data via a compact flash card from the Holter device to a desktop computer for analysis.

We believe that the Holter oximeter represents a very promising new method of screening for OSA in the unattended home environment, said Dr. Stern. It uses time-tested inexpensive devices to produce a reliable and sensitive measure of the AHI. Compared to other tests currently used for home screening of OSA, it has a very high reliability rate and correlates well with PSG. It could become a first-line screening tool for OSA in the adult population and is especially promising in the pediatric population, where the most common screening device has been pulse oximetry alone.

Pulse oximetry in children is problematic. The pathophysiology of OSA in children is different from that in adults, with frequent episodes of upper airway obstruction that are not associated with saturation drop.5 In children, there are large numbers of movement artifacts, due to their more restless sleep.6 These artifacts can cause low saturation recordings and a large number of false positive findings. A recent study questioned the validity of pulse oximetry in children and suggested that if it is used as a test for the diagnosis of OSA, it should be associated with additional sensors, such as motion sensors or measures of airflow.7

Michael Friedman, MD

Michael Friedman, MD

It’s even more difficult to get kids into a lab and get them to sleep, as their sleeping position is restricted because of the numerous electrodes and their sleep is interrupted by technicians repositioning the electrodes, said Dr. Stern. The home device is a major advance for screening kids, as it eases follow-up and retesting after treatment.

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 | Single Page

Filed Under: Sleep Medicine Issue: October 2007

You Might Also Like:

  • No Significant Association Between Laryngopharyngeal Reflux and Obstructive Sleep Apnea
  • New Developments Regarding Hypoglossal Nerve Stimulation for Obstructive Sleep Apnea
  • Can Lingual Tonsillectomy Improve Pediatric Obstructive Sleep Apnea?
  • Adding Enhanced Measurements to Drug-Induced Sleep Endoscopy Aids in Distinguishing Central from Obstructive Sleep Apnea in Patients

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

The Triological SocietyENTtoday is a publication of The Triological Society.

Polls

Would you choose a concierge physician as your PCP?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...
  • Polls Archive

Top Articles for Residents

  • Applications Open for Resident Members of ENTtoday Edit Board
  • How To Provide Helpful Feedback To Residents
  • Call for Resident Bowl Questions
  • New Standardized Otolaryngology Curriculum Launching July 1 Should Be Valuable Resource For Physicians Around The World
  • Do Training Programs Give Otolaryngology Residents the Necessary Tools to Do Productive Research?
  • Popular this Week
  • Most Popular
  • Most Recent
    • A Journey Through Pay Inequity: A Physician’s Firsthand Account

    • The Dramatic Rise in Tongue Tie and Lip Tie Treatment

    • Otolaryngologists Are Still Debating the Effectiveness of Tongue Tie Treatment

    • Is Middle Ear Pressure Affected by Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Use?

    • Rating Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Severity: How Do Two Common Instruments Compare?

    • The Dramatic Rise in Tongue Tie and Lip Tie Treatment

    • Rating Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Severity: How Do Two Common Instruments Compare?

    • Is Middle Ear Pressure Affected by Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Use?

    • Otolaryngologists Are Still Debating the Effectiveness of Tongue Tie Treatment

    • Complications for When Physicians Change a Maiden Name

    • Excitement Around Gene Therapy for Hearing Restoration
    • “Small” Acts of Kindness
    • How To: Endoscopic Total Maxillectomy Without Facial Skin Incision
    • Science Communities Must Speak Out When Policies Threaten Health and Safety
    • Observation Most Cost-Effective in Addressing AECRS in Absence of Bacterial Infection

Follow Us

  • Contact Us
  • About Us
  • Advertise
  • The Triological Society
  • The Laryngoscope
  • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • Cookies

Wiley

Copyright © 2025 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies. ISSN 1559-4939