• Home
  • Practice Focus
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
    • How I Do It
    • TRIO Best Practices
  • Business of Medicine
    • Health Policy
    • Legal Matters
    • Practice Management
    • Tech Talk
    • AI
  • Literature Reviews
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
  • Career
    • Medical Education
    • Professional Development
    • Resident Focus
  • ENT Perspectives
    • ENT Expressions
    • Everyday Ethics
    • From TRIO
    • The Great Debate
    • Letter From the Editor
    • Rx: Wellness
    • The Voice
    • Viewpoint
  • TRIO Resources
    • Triological Society
    • The Laryngoscope
    • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
    • TRIO Combined Sections Meetings
    • COSM
    • Related Otolaryngology Events
  • Search

Developments in Testing for, Treating Obstructive Sleep Apnea

by Jennifer Decker Arevalo, MA • October 1, 2007

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
Print-Friendly Version

Based on the tests, 71.4% of the patients had positive pH studies and 10.4% reported no signs or symptoms of LPR, indicating occult disease. Patients who tested positive for LPR were enrolled in Phase II and treated with esomeprazole magnesium, 40 mg QD, for two months. After two months, the PSG, pH study, QOL survey and subject data collection were repeated.

You Might Also Like

  • No Significant Association Between Laryngopharyngeal Reflux and Obstructive Sleep Apnea
  • New Developments Regarding Hypoglossal Nerve Stimulation for Obstructive Sleep Apnea
  • Can Lingual Tonsillectomy Improve Pediatric Obstructive Sleep Apnea?
  • Adding Enhanced Measurements to Drug-Induced Sleep Endoscopy Aids in Distinguishing Central from Obstructive Sleep Apnea in Patients
Explore This Issue
October 2007

During the study, we did not use CPAP and BiPAP, even though they are a fairly simple and effective treatment for OSA, because the purpose of this study was to evaluate whether the elimination of LPR, as an isolated treatment, could improve OSA, said Dr. Friedman.

In the 32 patients participating in Phase II, snoring levels decreased from 8.7 ± 2.1 to 6.9 ± 2.6 (p09), daytime sleepiness decreased from 14.4 ± 3.5 to 11.2 ± 2.5 (p21), AHI from 33.5 ± 21.6 to 30.1 ± 12.3 (p12), and minimum O2 saturation increased form 85.7 ± 8.3 to 87.1 ± 5.0 (p16).

Although no patients were cured by proton-pump inhibitor therapy alone, the study identified the following important points. First, LPR and OSA are common comorbid conditions; the incidence of LPR in patients with OSA in this study was 71.4%. Second, treatment of LPR had a significant impact on the reduction of AHI, snoring, and daytime sleepiness, and it also improved minimum oxygen saturation.

This was the first study to focus on patients with negative upper esophageal monitoring indicating the elimination of LPR. In patients with both conditions, adequate treatment of LPR with esomeprazole was effective in reducing the subjective and objective findings of OSA and is an important adjunct in the overall management of OSA.

References

  1. Pang K, Terris D. Screening for obstructive sleep apnea: an evidence-based analysis. Am J Otolaryngol 2006;27(2);112-8.

    [Context Link]

  2. de Chazal P, Penzel T, Heneghan C. Automated detection of obstructive sleep apnea at different time scales using electrocardiogram. Physiol Meas 2004;25(4):967-83.

    [Context Link]

  3. Shouldice RB, O’Brien LM, O’Brien C, et al. Detection of obstructive sleep apnea in pediatric subjects using surface lead electrocardiogram features. Sleep 2004;27(4):784-92.

    [Context Link]

  4. de Chazal P, Heneghan C, Sheridan E, et al. Automated processing of the single lead electrocardiogram for the detection of obstructive sleep apnea. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 2003;50(6):686-96.

    [Context Link]

  5. American Thoracic Society. Standards and indications for cardiopulmonary sleep studies in children. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 1996;153(2):866-78.

    [Context Link]

  6. Scholle S, Zwacka G. Arousals and obstructive sleep apnea syndrome in children. Clin Neurophysiol 2001(6);112:984-91.

    [Context Link]

  7. Kirk VG, Bohn SG, Flemons W, et al. Comparison of home oximetry monitoring with laboratory polysomnography in children. Chest 2003;124(5):1702-8.

    [Context Link]

  8. Wise SK, Wise JC, DelGaudio JM. Gastroesophageal reflux and laryngopharyngeal reflux in patients with sleep-disordered breathing. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2006;135(2):253-7.

    [Context Link]

  9. Kasasbeh A, Kasasbeh E, Krishnaswamy G. Potential mechanisms connecting asthma, esophageal reflux, and obesity/sleep apnea complex-a hypothetical review. Sleep Med Rev 2007;11(1):47-58.

    [Context Link]

  10. Morse CA, Quan SF, May MZ. Is there a relationship between obstructive sleep apnea and gastroesophageal reflux disease? Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2004;2(9):761-8.

    [Context Link]

  11. Green BT, Broughton WA, O’Connor JB. Marked improvement in nocturnal gastroesophageal reflux in a large cohort of patients with obstructive sleep apnea treated with continuous positive airway pressure. Arch Intern Med 2003;163(1):41-5.

    [Context Link]

©2007 The Triological Society

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 | Single Page

Filed Under: Sleep Medicine Issue: October 2007

You Might Also Like:

  • No Significant Association Between Laryngopharyngeal Reflux and Obstructive Sleep Apnea
  • New Developments Regarding Hypoglossal Nerve Stimulation for Obstructive Sleep Apnea
  • Can Lingual Tonsillectomy Improve Pediatric Obstructive Sleep Apnea?
  • Adding Enhanced Measurements to Drug-Induced Sleep Endoscopy Aids in Distinguishing Central from Obstructive Sleep Apnea in Patients

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

The Triological SocietyENTtoday is a publication of The Triological Society.

Polls

Do you use AI-powered scribes for documentation?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...
  • Polls Archive

Top Articles for Residents

  • Applications Open for Resident Members of ENTtoday Edit Board
  • How To Provide Helpful Feedback To Residents
  • Call for Resident Bowl Questions
  • New Standardized Otolaryngology Curriculum Launching July 1 Should Be Valuable Resource For Physicians Around The World
  • Do Training Programs Give Otolaryngology Residents the Necessary Tools to Do Productive Research?
  • Popular this Week
  • Most Popular
  • Most Recent
    • The Dramatic Rise in Tongue Tie and Lip Tie Treatment

    • Otolaryngologists Are Still Debating the Effectiveness of Tongue Tie Treatment

    • Rating Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Severity: How Do Two Common Instruments Compare?

    • History of the Cochlear Implant

    • Keeping Watch for Skin Cancers on the Head and Neck

    • The Dramatic Rise in Tongue Tie and Lip Tie Treatment

    • Rating Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Severity: How Do Two Common Instruments Compare?

    • Is Middle Ear Pressure Affected by Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Use?

    • Otolaryngologists Are Still Debating the Effectiveness of Tongue Tie Treatment

    • Complications for When Physicians Change a Maiden Name

    • ENTtoday Recognized for Excellence
    • The Importance of Time Away
    • Endoscopic Ear Surgery: Advancements and Adoption Challenges 
    • Reflections from a Past President of the Triological Society
    • ENT Surgeons Explore the Benefits and Challenges of AI-Powered Scribes: Revolutionizing Documentation in Healthcare

Follow Us

  • Contact Us
  • About Us
  • Advertise
  • The Triological Society
  • The Laryngoscope
  • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • Cookies

Wiley

Copyright © 2025 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies. ISSN 1559-4939