• Home
  • Practice Focus
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
    • How I Do It
    • TRIO Best Practices
  • Business of Medicine
    • Health Policy
    • Legal Matters
    • Practice Management
    • Tech Talk
    • AI
  • Literature Reviews
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
  • Career
    • Medical Education
    • Professional Development
    • Resident Focus
  • ENT Perspectives
    • ENT Expressions
    • Everyday Ethics
    • From TRIO
    • The Great Debate
    • Letter From the Editor
    • Rx: Wellness
    • The Voice
    • Viewpoint
  • TRIO Resources
    • Triological Society
    • The Laryngoscope
    • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
    • TRIO Combined Sections Meetings
    • COSM
    • Related Otolaryngology Events
  • Search

Digital Efficiency: Panel discusses the inevitability of EMRs

by Tom Valeo • March 1, 2010

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
Print-Friendly Version

The Health Information Technology for Economic and Clinical Health Act (HITECH), which was part of the recent stimulus bill, has made available $19 billion to promote and stimulate the adoption and use of electronic records primarily through incentives provided by Medicare and Medicaid reimbursement.

You Might Also Like

  • A Better Way to Implement EMRs: Why one-size-fits-all won’t work
  • Digital Dilemma: Physicians oppose EHR requirements
  • EMR and Advertising: Strange Bedfellows?
  • The Great Unknowns: Panel discusses research on pediatric tonsillitis, ottitis, sinusitis
Explore This Issue
March 2010

The sooner a hospital or private practice adopts EMRs, the more money will be available, Dr. Nussenbaum emphasized. “If you do it each year between 2011 and 2015, you can get $44,000 per physician,” Dr. Nussenbaum said, “but if you don’t start adopting until 2013, it goes down to $39,000. If you adopt in 2014, it goes down to $35,000. And if you start adopting in 2015, you’d have no access to any federal incentive money.”

After that, penalties will be imposed on those who have not yet adopted EMRs. “The penalties start in 2015 with 1 percent,” Dr. Nussenbaum said. “In 2016, it’s 2 percent. It goes all the way down to 2019 with a 5 percent decrease.”

EMR will lead to happier employees and physicians as well as to safer, better quality care for patients.
—Brian Nussenbaum, MD

Security Concerns

Udayan K. Shah, MD, FACS, FAAP, filled in for his brother, Rahul K. Shah, MD, FACS, FAAP, co-chair of the American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery Foundation’s Patient Safety and Quality Improvement Committee.

Dr. Shah, associate professor of otolaryngology-head and neck surgery at Thomas Jefferson University in Philadelphia, read from notes provided by his brother regarding potential security problems that may result from the switch to electronic records. There’s the danger, he said, of unauthorized access to patient records, such as Social Security numbers and details about chronic health problems such as diabetes and mental illness, which health and life insurance companies might try to use to deny payment.

“There may be holdouts among patients, and our obligation is to show them the advantages of EMR in respect to outcomes, process improvements, and policy imperatives,” Dr. Shah said. ENTtoday

Pages: 1 2 | Single Page

Filed Under: Departments, Health Policy, Practice Management, Tech Talk Tagged With: EHR, electronic health records, healthcare reform, policy, practice management, QualityIssue: March 2010

You Might Also Like:

  • A Better Way to Implement EMRs: Why one-size-fits-all won’t work
  • Digital Dilemma: Physicians oppose EHR requirements
  • EMR and Advertising: Strange Bedfellows?
  • The Great Unknowns: Panel discusses research on pediatric tonsillitis, ottitis, sinusitis

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

The Triological SocietyENTtoday is a publication of The Triological Society.

Polls

Would you choose a concierge physician as your PCP?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...
  • Polls Archive

Top Articles for Residents

  • Applications Open for Resident Members of ENTtoday Edit Board
  • How To Provide Helpful Feedback To Residents
  • Call for Resident Bowl Questions
  • New Standardized Otolaryngology Curriculum Launching July 1 Should Be Valuable Resource For Physicians Around The World
  • Do Training Programs Give Otolaryngology Residents the Necessary Tools to Do Productive Research?
  • Popular this Week
  • Most Popular
  • Most Recent
    • A Journey Through Pay Inequity: A Physician’s Firsthand Account

    • The Dramatic Rise in Tongue Tie and Lip Tie Treatment

    • Otolaryngologists Are Still Debating the Effectiveness of Tongue Tie Treatment

    • Is Middle Ear Pressure Affected by Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Use?

    • Rating Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Severity: How Do Two Common Instruments Compare?

    • The Dramatic Rise in Tongue Tie and Lip Tie Treatment

    • Rating Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Severity: How Do Two Common Instruments Compare?

    • Is Middle Ear Pressure Affected by Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Use?

    • Otolaryngologists Are Still Debating the Effectiveness of Tongue Tie Treatment

    • Complications for When Physicians Change a Maiden Name

    • Excitement Around Gene Therapy for Hearing Restoration
    • “Small” Acts of Kindness
    • How To: Endoscopic Total Maxillectomy Without Facial Skin Incision
    • Science Communities Must Speak Out When Policies Threaten Health and Safety
    • Observation Most Cost-Effective in Addressing AECRS in Absence of Bacterial Infection

Follow Us

  • Contact Us
  • About Us
  • Advertise
  • The Triological Society
  • The Laryngoscope
  • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • Cookies

Wiley

Copyright © 2025 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies. ISSN 1559-4939