• Home
  • Practice Focus
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
    • How I Do It
    • TRIO Best Practices
  • Business of Medicine
    • Health Policy
    • Legal Matters
    • Practice Management
    • Tech Talk
    • AI
  • Literature Reviews
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
  • Career
    • Medical Education
    • Professional Development
    • Resident Focus
  • ENT Perspectives
    • ENT Expressions
    • Everyday Ethics
    • From TRIO
    • The Great Debate
    • Letter From the Editor
    • Rx: Wellness
    • The Voice
    • Viewpoint
  • TRIO Resources
    • Triological Society
    • The Laryngoscope
    • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
    • TRIO Combined Sections Meetings
    • COSM
    • Related Otolaryngology Events
  • Search

Endoscopic Resection of Esthesioneuroblastomas Shows Promising Results

by Ed Susman • October 1, 2008

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
Print-Friendly Version

The defect created is the same that is achieved in conventional approaches. He said that the defect can be covered with vascularized flaps. One thing that we have learned over the last decade is the use of a Foley balloon as an external bolster to maintain support during the early healing period.

You Might Also Like

  • Endoscopic versus Open Craniofacial Resection of Esthesioneuroblastoma: What Is the Evidence?
  • More Experience Needed for Endoscopic Resection of Esthesioneuroblastoma
  • Do Open and Endoscopic Resection Approaches to Juvenile Nasopharyngea Angiofibroma Result in Similar Blood Loss, Recurrence Rates?
  • Innovative Doctors + Better Technology = Practice Changess
Explore This Issue
October 2008

He said that cerebrospinal fluid leaks that were a major complication in early endonasal procedures have been corrected with the use of flaps. With use of the septal mucosa flap, we have decreased our leak rate down from about 25 percent to about 5 to 10 percent. In fact, our leak rate is now 4 percent overall and 7 percent in high-flow leak situations, which is comparable for what has been reported in the open approach, he said.

We have to remember that the extent of surgery is determined by the biological behavior of the tumor, Dr. Snyderman said. The endoscope is just a tool. It is not the endoscope versus the microscope. It is about choosing the best approach for the patient and the tumor.

Dr. Snyderman disclosed that he has possible financial conflicts of interest with Karl Storz Endoscopy America and Stryker Navigation and Instruments.

©2008 The Triological Society

Pages: 1 2 3 4 | Single Page

Filed Under: Head and Neck, Practice Focus Tagged With: cancer, endoscopic surgery, head and neck, outcomes, surgery, techniques, treatment, tumorIssue: October 2008

You Might Also Like:

  • Endoscopic versus Open Craniofacial Resection of Esthesioneuroblastoma: What Is the Evidence?
  • More Experience Needed for Endoscopic Resection of Esthesioneuroblastoma
  • Do Open and Endoscopic Resection Approaches to Juvenile Nasopharyngea Angiofibroma Result in Similar Blood Loss, Recurrence Rates?
  • Innovative Doctors + Better Technology = Practice Changess

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

The Triological SocietyENTtoday is a publication of The Triological Society.

Polls

Would you choose a concierge physician as your PCP?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...
  • Polls Archive

Top Articles for Residents

  • Applications Open for Resident Members of ENTtoday Edit Board
  • How To Provide Helpful Feedback To Residents
  • Call for Resident Bowl Questions
  • New Standardized Otolaryngology Curriculum Launching July 1 Should Be Valuable Resource For Physicians Around The World
  • Do Training Programs Give Otolaryngology Residents the Necessary Tools to Do Productive Research?
  • Popular this Week
  • Most Popular
  • Most Recent
    • A Journey Through Pay Inequity: A Physician’s Firsthand Account

    • The Dramatic Rise in Tongue Tie and Lip Tie Treatment

    • Otolaryngologists Are Still Debating the Effectiveness of Tongue Tie Treatment

    • Is Middle Ear Pressure Affected by Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Use?

    • Rating Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Severity: How Do Two Common Instruments Compare?

    • The Dramatic Rise in Tongue Tie and Lip Tie Treatment

    • Rating Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Severity: How Do Two Common Instruments Compare?

    • Is Middle Ear Pressure Affected by Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Use?

    • Otolaryngologists Are Still Debating the Effectiveness of Tongue Tie Treatment

    • Complications for When Physicians Change a Maiden Name

    • Excitement Around Gene Therapy for Hearing Restoration
    • “Small” Acts of Kindness
    • How To: Endoscopic Total Maxillectomy Without Facial Skin Incision
    • Science Communities Must Speak Out When Policies Threaten Health and Safety
    • Observation Most Cost-Effective in Addressing AECRS in Absence of Bacterial Infection

Follow Us

  • Contact Us
  • About Us
  • Advertise
  • The Triological Society
  • The Laryngoscope
  • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • Cookies

Wiley

Copyright © 2025 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies. ISSN 1559-4939