• Home
  • Practice Focus
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
    • How I Do It
    • TRIO Best Practices
  • Business of Medicine
    • Health Policy
    • Legal Matters
    • Practice Management
    • Technology
    • AI
  • Literature Reviews
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
  • Career
    • Medical Education
    • Professional Development
    • Resident Focus
  • ENT Perspectives
    • ENT Expressions
    • Everyday Ethics
    • From TRIO
    • The Great Debate
    • Letter From the Editor
    • Rx: Wellness
    • The Voice
    • Viewpoint
    • SUO Corner
  • TRIO Resources
    • Triological Society
    • The Laryngoscope
    • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
    • TRIO Combined Sections Meetings
    • COSM
    • Related Otolaryngology Events
  • Home
  • Practice Focus
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
    • How I Do It
    • TRIO Best Practices
  • Business of Medicine
    • Health Policy
    • Legal Matters
    • Practice Management
    • Technology
    • AI
  • Literature Reviews
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
  • Career
    • Medical Education
    • Professional Development
    • Resident Focus
  • ENT Perspectives
    • ENT Expressions
    • Everyday Ethics
    • From TRIO
    • The Great Debate
    • Letter From the Editor
    • Rx: Wellness
    • The Voice
    • Viewpoint
    • SUO Corner
  • TRIO Resources
    • Triological Society
    • The Laryngoscope
    • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
    • TRIO Combined Sections Meetings
    • COSM
    • Related Otolaryngology Events
  • Search

Evaluating Treatment Patterns in Bell’s Palsy Using Nationwide Employer- Sponsored Healthcare Claims

by Pinky Sharma • February 2, 2026

  • Tweet
  • Email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
Print-Friendly Version

CLINICAL QUESTION

You Might Also Like

  • New Options for Management of Facial Palsy Can Help Patients Regain Smiles, Movement
  • Facial Nerve Centers and New Treatment Options Can Make a Difference for Patients with Facial Paralysis
  • Statistical Fragility of Steroid–Antiviral Therapy for Bell’s Palsy: A Systematic Review of RCTs
  • Second Opinions: Facial Nerve Paralysis
Explore This Issue
February 2026

How closely do real-world prescribing patterns for Bell’s palsy align with the American Academy of Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery (AAO-HNS) guideline-recommended steroid and steroid–antiviral therapy?

BOTTOM LINE

Across a national cohort of 66,708 adults with Bell’s palsy, 51.9% received guideline-recommended steroid therapy within 72 hours, while 44.7% received no medication at all. Antiviral monotherapy, discouraged by AAOHNS guidelines, was used in 3.4% of cases. Substantial demographic and regional variation were observed in treatment selection.

BACKGROUND: High-dose corticosteroids initiated within 72 hours remain the standard of care for Bell’s palsy, with antivirals recommended only as adjuncts. Real-world prescribing practices vary widely across settings, and the relative use of steroids versus combination therapy is not well characterized. This study evaluated national treatment patterns to better understand adherence to guideline recommendations.

STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective cohort analysis of MarketScan commercial and Medicare supplemental claims (2013- 2020). Adults with idiopathic Bell’s palsy and one year or more of continuous enrollment were included. Treatment categories included steroid monotherapy, steroid–antiviral combination therapy, antiviral monotherapy, or no treatment.

SETTING: Nationwide, employer-sponsored outpatient insurance claims encompassing more than 100 million covered individuals

SYNOPSIS: The study included 66,708 adults diagnosed with Bell’s palsy. Overall, 44.7% received no pharmacologic therapy. Among treated patients, 34.1% received combination steroid–antiviral therapy, 17.8% received steroid monotherapy, and 3.4% received antivirals alone. Guideline-concordant steroid therapy within 72 hours was delivered in 51.9% of all cases, with 94.6% of treated patients initiating steroids on the index date. Treatment selection varied significantly by demographics, region, and clinical presentation. Men had higher odds of receiving combination therapy, whereas women and older adults were more likely to receive steroid monotherapy. Patients in the South and West were more likely to receive combination therapy than those in the Northeast. Certain presenting symptoms influenced prescribing: Ear pain was associated with combination therapy, whereas hearing loss and loss of lacrimation were associated with monotherapy. The authors emphasize that nearly half of patients received no treatment—possibly reflecting mild presentations or spontaneous recovery, but also variability in access to care, point of presentation, and awareness of guidelines. Limitations include the lack of clinical severity measures, incomplete capture of prescriptions outside insurance, and the inability to track recovery. Despite these constraints, the findings demonstrate persistent inconsistencies in real-world Bell’s palsy management and widespread underuse of recommended steroid therapy.

CITATION: Ratna S, et al. Evaluating treatment patterns in Bell’s palsy using nationwide employer-sponsored healthcare claims. Laryngoscope. 2025;135:2756- 2762. doi: 10.1002/lary.32115.

COMMENT: This research demonstrates that only half of patients with acute Bell’s palsy in the U.S. receive recommended treatment with high-dose steroids, with or without an antiviral. This statistic is concerning since starting high-dose steroids within 72 hours of symptom onset improves chances that patients make a complete recovery.—Matthew Q. Miller, MD

Pages: 1 2 | Multi-Page

Filed Under: Facial Plastic/Reconstructive, Literature Reviews Tagged With: Bell's palsyIssue: February 2026

You Might Also Like:

  • New Options for Management of Facial Palsy Can Help Patients Regain Smiles, Movement
  • Facial Nerve Centers and New Treatment Options Can Make a Difference for Patients with Facial Paralysis
  • Statistical Fragility of Steroid–Antiviral Therapy for Bell’s Palsy: A Systematic Review of RCTs
  • Second Opinions: Facial Nerve Paralysis

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

The Triological SocietyENTtoday is a publication of The Triological Society.

Polls

More and more medical trainees are taking dedicated, prolonged gap years. Did you?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...
  • Polls Archive

Top Articles for Residents

  • Is the SLOR in Otolaryngology Residency Applications Contributing to Rural Disparities?
  • Applications Open for Resident Members of the ENTtoday Editorial Board
  • A Resident’s View of AI in Otolaryngology
  • Call for Resident Bowl Questions
  • Resident Pearls: Pediatric Otolaryngologists Share Tips for Safer, Smarter Tonsillectomies
  • Popular this Week
  • Most Popular
  • Most Recent
    • Office Laryngoscopy Is Not Aerosol Generating When Evaluated by Optical Particle Sizer
    • Some Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Resists PPI Treatment
    • Cochlear Implants Improve Performance and Net Savings in Infants
    • Top 10 LARY and LIO Articles of 2024
    • Empty Nose Syndrome: Physiological, Psychological, or Perhaps a Little of Both?
    • The Dramatic Rise in Tongue Tie and Lip Tie Treatment
    • Rating Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Severity: How Do Two Common Instruments Compare?
    • Is Middle Ear Pressure Affected by Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Use?
    • Otolaryngologists Are Still Debating the Effectiveness of Tongue Tie Treatment
    • Keeping Watch for Skin Cancers on the Head and Neck
    • Short-Term Efficacy of Biologics in Recalcitrant AFRS: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    • The Devaluation of Otolaryngology: An Evaluation of CMS’s Involvement in Physician Reimbursement
    • Embolized Middle Meningeal Artery as a Surgical Landmark in Infratemporal Fossa
    • Lord of the (Magnetic) Rings: Rigid Bronchoscopy for Aspirated Magnetic Foreign Bodies in Tertiary Bronchi
    • What Otolaryngologists Can Learn from Athletes

Follow Us

  • Contact Us
  • About Us
  • Advertise
  • The Triological Society
  • The Laryngoscope
  • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • Cookies

Wiley

Copyright © 2026 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies. ISSN 1559-4939