• Home
  • Practice Focus
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
    • How I Do It
    • TRIO Best Practices
  • Business of Medicine
    • Health Policy
    • Legal Matters
    • Practice Management
    • Tech Talk
    • AI
  • Literature Reviews
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
  • Career
    • Medical Education
    • Professional Development
    • Resident Focus
  • ENT Perspectives
    • ENT Expressions
    • Everyday Ethics
    • From TRIO
    • The Great Debate
    • Letter From the Editor
    • Rx: Wellness
    • The Voice
    • Viewpoint
  • TRIO Resources
    • Triological Society
    • The Laryngoscope
    • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
    • TRIO Combined Sections Meetings
    • COSM
    • Related Otolaryngology Events
  • Search

Evidence-Based Sinusitis

by Jill U. Adams • July 5, 2012

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
Print-Friendly Version

Antibiotic Choices

Once a doctor and patient have decided to use antibiotics, the two sets of guidelines differ on which drug should be first-line treatment. The AAO-HNS guidelines call for amoxicillin (unless there’s a penicillin allergy), because it’s cheaper and carries a lower risk of side effects than other antibiotics. IDSA recommends amoxicillin and clavulanic acid (Augmentin), based on the latest microbiology evidence. The AAO-HNS was stricter in relying on clinical trial data, whereas the IDSA also incorporated microbiology trends.

You Might Also Like

  • Hoarseness Guidelines Continue to Draw Scrutiny: Panel members question evidence-based criteria
  • Evidence-Based Medicine Comes to Otolaryngology
  • A New Direction for Sleep: New OSA guidelines fuel another evidence-based medicine debate
  • Antibiotics for Sinusitis: To Use or Not to Use?
Explore This Issue
July 2012

“The microbiology has changed, resistance patterns have changed, and because of the pneumococcal vaccine, the types of pathogens associated with sinusitis have changed,” Dr. Chow said. Specifically, there’s more Haemophilus influenzae and less Streptococcus pneumoniae, particularly in children. And, Dr. Chow added, “with H. influenzae, the bacteria can break down amoxicillin, so we recommend amoxicillin plus clavulanate.”

The IDSA guidelines take an in-depth look at second-line and alternative antibiotic choices in children and adults. The AAO-HNS guidelines don’t go beyond the first-line treatment drug.

Peter Hwang, MD, professor and director of the Stanford Sinus Center at Stanford University School of Medicine in Stanford, Calif., said he has no problem with the IDSA’s broader interpretation of the data. In fact, he tends to choose amoxicillin-clavulanate in his practice based on knowledge of the local bacterial resistance patterns. At Stanford, a majority of H. influenzae types are beta lactamase producing, and almost all Moraxella catarrhalis are beta lactamase positive, he said. “As clinicians, we’re choosing antibiotics based on the antibiogram for our community or our hospital,” he said.

Drs. Merenstein and Rosenfeld argued for the conservative approach. Augmentin has never outperformed amoxicillin in a clinical trial; therefore, evidence-based guidelines cannot recommend its use as a first-line treatment, absent other considerations for an individual case. “The amoxicillin-clavulanate opinion is not based on trials; it’s just theoretical,” said Dr. Merenstein.

Treatment Failure

The AAO-HNS guidelines say to consider another therapy if symptoms haven’t improved after seven days of treatment. The IDSA says to look sooner than that if there’s no improvement after three to five days of antibiotics. (Both advise reassessment with worsening symptoms.)

Again, Dr. Rosenfeld cited clinical trial data for the AAO-HNS recommendation. “After the first few days, maybe 20 to 30 percent of patients will be better, but it took seven days before seeing many people improve,” he said.

Dr. Chow cited clinical observations of when patients get better. “If they’re not going to respond, we’ll know in three to five days,” he said. Indeed, the guidelines cite pediatric data in which 45 percent of patients were cured within three days, and ‘many others’ had improved.

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 | Single Page

Filed Under: Articles, Clinical, Features Tagged With: evidence-based medicine, guidelines, SinusitisIssue: July 2012

You Might Also Like:

  • Hoarseness Guidelines Continue to Draw Scrutiny: Panel members question evidence-based criteria
  • Evidence-Based Medicine Comes to Otolaryngology
  • A New Direction for Sleep: New OSA guidelines fuel another evidence-based medicine debate
  • Antibiotics for Sinusitis: To Use or Not to Use?

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

The Triological SocietyENTtoday is a publication of The Triological Society.

Polls

Would you choose a concierge physician as your PCP?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...
  • Polls Archive

Top Articles for Residents

  • Applications Open for Resident Members of ENTtoday Edit Board
  • How To Provide Helpful Feedback To Residents
  • Call for Resident Bowl Questions
  • New Standardized Otolaryngology Curriculum Launching July 1 Should Be Valuable Resource For Physicians Around The World
  • Do Training Programs Give Otolaryngology Residents the Necessary Tools to Do Productive Research?
  • Popular this Week
  • Most Popular
  • Most Recent
    • A Journey Through Pay Inequity: A Physician’s Firsthand Account

    • The Dramatic Rise in Tongue Tie and Lip Tie Treatment

    • Otolaryngologists Are Still Debating the Effectiveness of Tongue Tie Treatment

    • Is Middle Ear Pressure Affected by Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Use?

    • Rating Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Severity: How Do Two Common Instruments Compare?

    • The Dramatic Rise in Tongue Tie and Lip Tie Treatment

    • Rating Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Severity: How Do Two Common Instruments Compare?

    • Is Middle Ear Pressure Affected by Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Use?

    • Otolaryngologists Are Still Debating the Effectiveness of Tongue Tie Treatment

    • Complications for When Physicians Change a Maiden Name

    • Excitement Around Gene Therapy for Hearing Restoration
    • “Small” Acts of Kindness
    • How To: Endoscopic Total Maxillectomy Without Facial Skin Incision
    • Science Communities Must Speak Out When Policies Threaten Health and Safety
    • Observation Most Cost-Effective in Addressing AECRS in Absence of Bacterial Infection

Follow Us

  • Contact Us
  • About Us
  • Advertise
  • The Triological Society
  • The Laryngoscope
  • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • Cookies

Wiley

Copyright © 2025 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies. ISSN 1559-4939